Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Oceanic gyres in the Arctic

View through CrossRef
The Arctic can be seen as a two-layer ocean: thin (<100m) mixed layer at the surface, and the rest of the weakly-stratified ~5-km water column, separated from the surface waters by the Arctic halocline. The weak subsurface ocean stratification results in most of the ocean flow being depth-uniform and guided by bathymetry. One way to look at the Arctic long-term, large-scale ocean circulation is examining the Arctic gyres and cross-ocean currents, such as the Trans-Polar Drift. Wilson et all 2021[1] show how gyres, saddle points and flow separation structures &#8220;separatrices&#8221; in the surface ocean circulation changes between years and how these affect cross-basin Arctic oceanic connectivity. We extend the method to the subsurface oceanic flow and examine barotropic circulation in the present-day Arctic Ocean using global NEMO model (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean) at 3-km horizontal resolution. The closed-gyre detection method allows us to map positions of the principal Arctic gyres and quantify their strength. The Montgomery potential analyses complements the study by giving us an insight in the geostrophic flows of the Atlantic and Pacific waters. The results suggest a large year-to-year variability of the Arctic gyres and the changes in the Arctic &#8211; the Nordic Sea connectivity, which impacts exports of the freshwater, heat, and biogeochemical tracers from the Arctic.This work has been funded from LTS-S CLASS (Climate&#8211;Linked Atlantic&#160;Sector Science, grant NE/R015953/1), from the European Union&#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 820989 (project COMFORT), from the project EPOC, EU grant 101059547 and UKRI grant 10038003 and from the UK NERC project CANARI (NE/W004984/1).Reference[1] Wilson, C., Aksenov, Y., Rynders, S. et al. Significant variability of&#160;structure and predictability of Arctic Ocean surface pathways affects basinwide&#160;connectivity. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2, 164 (2021).&#160;https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00237-0.
Title: Oceanic gyres in the Arctic
Description:
The Arctic can be seen as a two-layer ocean: thin (<100m) mixed layer at the surface, and the rest of the weakly-stratified ~5-km water column, separated from the surface waters by the Arctic halocline.
The weak subsurface ocean stratification results in most of the ocean flow being depth-uniform and guided by bathymetry.
One way to look at the Arctic long-term, large-scale ocean circulation is examining the Arctic gyres and cross-ocean currents, such as the Trans-Polar Drift.
Wilson et all 2021[1] show how gyres, saddle points and flow separation structures &#8220;separatrices&#8221; in the surface ocean circulation changes between years and how these affect cross-basin Arctic oceanic connectivity.
We extend the method to the subsurface oceanic flow and examine barotropic circulation in the present-day Arctic Ocean using global NEMO model (Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean) at 3-km horizontal resolution.
The closed-gyre detection method allows us to map positions of the principal Arctic gyres and quantify their strength.
The Montgomery potential analyses complements the study by giving us an insight in the geostrophic flows of the Atlantic and Pacific waters.
The results suggest a large year-to-year variability of the Arctic gyres and the changes in the Arctic &#8211; the Nordic Sea connectivity, which impacts exports of the freshwater, heat, and biogeochemical tracers from the Arctic.
This work has been funded from LTS-S CLASS (Climate&#8211;Linked Atlantic&#160;Sector Science, grant NE/R015953/1), from the European Union&#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no.
820989 (project COMFORT), from the project EPOC, EU grant 101059547 and UKRI grant 10038003 and from the UK NERC project CANARI (NE/W004984/1).
Reference[1] Wilson, C.
, Aksenov, Y.
, Rynders, S.
et al.
Significant variability of&#160;structure and predictability of Arctic Ocean surface pathways affects basinwide&#160;connectivity.
Commun.
Earth.
Environ.
2, 164 (2021).
&#160;https://doi.
org/10.
1038/s43247-021-00237-0.

Related Results

Quantifying Arctic Storm Risk in a Changing Climate
Quantifying Arctic Storm Risk in a Changing Climate
&lt;p&gt;The Arctic has undergone significant change over the past few decades, and there has been great reductions in Arctic sea ice extent. The Arctic ocean has become mo...
The Polar Silk Road and China's role in Arctic governance
The Polar Silk Road and China's role in Arctic governance
The People's Republic of China (PRC) wants to become a key regional actor in the Arctic. PRC's underlying priority in the region is gaining access to commercial opportunities from ...
Russian Arctic Petroleum Resources: Challenges and Future Opportunities
Russian Arctic Petroleum Resources: Challenges and Future Opportunities
Abstract The Arctic continental shelf is believed to be the area with the highest unexplored potential for oil and gas as well as to unconventional hydrocarbon re...
Arctic Drilling Hazard Identification Relating to Salt Tectonics
Arctic Drilling Hazard Identification Relating to Salt Tectonics
Abstract The focus of this study is to improve our technical understanding of anticipated drilling hazards in the Arctic Circle, especially hazards relating to drill...
Arctic Standards - A Comparison and Gap Study
Arctic Standards - A Comparison and Gap Study
Abstract This paper addresses the issue of Arctic standards covering past developments, present status, and future needs. The successful development of the Arctic...
Circular FPSO for Arctic Deepwater
Circular FPSO for Arctic Deepwater
Abstract The areas north of the Arctic Circle 66.56 degree North Latitude have significant potential for oil and gas accumulations. This paper presents a state of...
The Visegrad Group’s Approach to the Arctic: Which (Sub-Regional) Policies?
The Visegrad Group’s Approach to the Arctic: Which (Sub-Regional) Policies?
The Visegrád countries (or V4) are increasingly showing interest in the Arctic region. With different levels of engagement, the four countries carry on diplomatic, economic, and sc...
Oceanic detachments in Tethys realm: core complexe or not?
Oceanic detachments in Tethys realm: core complexe or not?
Oceanic detachments are large-offset normal faults along the flanks of mid-ocean ridges. They represent a mode of accretion of the oceanic lithosphere that is fundamentally differe...

Back to Top