Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Acoustic Reflex Latency Test in the Evaluation of Nontumor Patients with Abnormal Brainstem Latencies
View through CrossRef
The acoustic reflex latency test (ARLT), an indirect measure of neural conduction time utilizing the electroimpedance method, was used to evaluate 43 highly suspect, nontumor patients who demonstrated abnormal latency results on brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA), false-positive for tumor. Normative values and criteria for tumor-positive ARLT results were established on a control group using a second generation test unit, comprised of dual impedance bridges and a digital signal averager, designed especially to perform the ARLT. When cut-off criteria for both absolute reflex latency and interaural latency difference (ILD) values were applied to this BERA false positive population, the ARLT correctly identified 93% of patients as having end-organ lesions. Differences in ARLT and BERA test results are attributed to differences in 1) method of measurement, 2) characteristics of the eliciting signal, and 3) generation of the response. These factors are discussed as sources of variability. Both ARLT and BERA are recommended as tandem procedures when screening for acoustic or angle tumors.
Title: Acoustic Reflex Latency Test in the Evaluation of Nontumor Patients with Abnormal Brainstem Latencies
Description:
The acoustic reflex latency test (ARLT), an indirect measure of neural conduction time utilizing the electroimpedance method, was used to evaluate 43 highly suspect, nontumor patients who demonstrated abnormal latency results on brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA), false-positive for tumor.
Normative values and criteria for tumor-positive ARLT results were established on a control group using a second generation test unit, comprised of dual impedance bridges and a digital signal averager, designed especially to perform the ARLT.
When cut-off criteria for both absolute reflex latency and interaural latency difference (ILD) values were applied to this BERA false positive population, the ARLT correctly identified 93% of patients as having end-organ lesions.
Differences in ARLT and BERA test results are attributed to differences in 1) method of measurement, 2) characteristics of the eliciting signal, and 3) generation of the response.
These factors are discussed as sources of variability.
Both ARLT and BERA are recommended as tandem procedures when screening for acoustic or angle tumors.
Related Results
Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes in Tumor and Nontumor Patients: A Systematic Review
Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes in Tumor and Nontumor Patients: A Systematic Review
AbstractObjectiveTo elucidate the differences in auditory performance between auditory brainstem implant (ABI) patients with tumor or nontumor etiologies.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase...
Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response
Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response
BACKGROUND: The speech auditory brainstem response is a tool that provides direct information on how speech sound is temporally and spectrally coded by the auditory brainstem. Spee...
Subjective audiometric measures in individuals with repeated acoustic trauma in the combat zone
Subjective audiometric measures in individuals with repeated acoustic trauma in the combat zone
Intense sound exposure that exceeds the pain threshold of human auditory sensitivity, known as acoustic trauma, causes significant and extensive changes in the auditory system. Thr...
Molecular specification of cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projection neurons in development
Molecular specification of cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projection neurons in development
Abstract
Skilled motor control requires precise connections between subcerebral projection neurons (SCPN) in the cerebral cortex and their approp...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
What's the Delay? Understanding Latency Across the Network
What's the Delay? Understanding Latency Across the Network
Network latency directly affects the performance of many applications that run over the Internet. While significant effort is spent on reducing network latency, the fundamental cap...
Short‐latency inhibitory reflex responses to inspiratory loading of the scalene muscles are impaired in spinal cord injury
Short‐latency inhibitory reflex responses to inspiratory loading of the scalene muscles are impaired in spinal cord injury
New Findings
What is the central question of this study?
The aim was to determine whether the reflex inhibition in the electromyographic activity of scalene muscles in response to...

