Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

<b>Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Push Back Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stone</b>

View through CrossRef
Background: Upper ureteric stones represent a major clinical challenge, often requiring surgical intervention when conservative measures fail. Minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy are widely adopted, but comparative evidence on postoperative pain outcomes remains limited. Objective: To compare postoperative pain, hospital stay, operative time, and stone clearance rates between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with upper ureteric stones. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January to June 2025. Sixty patients aged 18–60 years with radiologically confirmed upper ureteric stones were randomized to laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (n=30) or push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy (n=30). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 4 and 12 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, and stone clearance confirmed by imaging. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and regression adjustment for confounders. Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group at both 4 hours (6.2 ± 0.9 vs 7.4 ± 0.8, p<0.001) and 12 hours (4.8 ± 1.1 vs 6.1 ± 0.9, p<0.001). Operative time was longer for laparoscopy (98.4 ± 18.6 vs 76.2 ± 14.8 minutes, p<0.001), but hospital stay was shorter (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 3.1 ± 1.2 days, p<0.001). Stone clearance rates were high and comparable (96.7% vs 93.3%, p=0.55). Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy provides superior postoperative pain control and shorter hospitalization compared with push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy, without compromising stone clearance.
Title: <b>Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Push Back Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stone</b>
Description:
Background: Upper ureteric stones represent a major clinical challenge, often requiring surgical intervention when conservative measures fail.
Minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy are widely adopted, but comparative evidence on postoperative pain outcomes remains limited.
Objective: To compare postoperative pain, hospital stay, operative time, and stone clearance rates between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with upper ureteric stones.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Institute of Kidney Diseases, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January to June 2025.
Sixty patients aged 18–60 years with radiologically confirmed upper ureteric stones were randomized to laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (n=30) or push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy (n=30).
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 4 and 12 hours postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, and stone clearance confirmed by imaging.
Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and regression adjustment for confounders.
Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group at both 4 hours (6.
2 ± 0.
9 vs 7.
4 ± 0.
8, p<0.
001) and 12 hours (4.
8 ± 1.
1 vs 6.
1 ± 0.
9, p<0.
001).
Operative time was longer for laparoscopy (98.
4 ± 18.
6 vs 76.
2 ± 14.
8 minutes, p<0.
001), but hospital stay was shorter (2.
3 ± 0.
8 vs 3.
1 ± 1.
2 days, p<0.
001).
Stone clearance rates were high and comparable (96.
7% vs 93.
3%, p=0.
55).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy provides superior postoperative pain control and shorter hospitalization compared with push-back percutaneous nephrolithotomy, without compromising stone clearance.

Related Results

Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Objective: To compare grade I complication as per Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing standard (with tube) verses tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Study desig...
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Radial nerve palsy following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Injury to nerve is a well known complication of shoulder subluxation. Radial nerve injury is most commonly seen during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in lateral decubitus region. If ...
Semi-Rigid Pneumatic Ureteroscopicremoval of Ureteric Stone; Seven Years Experience At Nepalgunj Medical College
Semi-Rigid Pneumatic Ureteroscopicremoval of Ureteric Stone; Seven Years Experience At Nepalgunj Medical College
Background: The present study aimed to report the outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) treatment of ureteric stone with semi-rigid pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy.Method: This was a ...
Covid 19 Make us Confident to Perform ESWL Sessions for Treatment of Ureteric Stone
Covid 19 Make us Confident to Perform ESWL Sessions for Treatment of Ureteric Stone
Abstract The clinicians prefer URS as a first-line line treatment of upper ureteric stones but with COVID-19 restrictions and considering the patient's benefit, ESWL sessio...
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Efficacy of Holmium Laser vs Pneumatic Lithotripsy for Mid and Distal Ureteric Stones Above 10 Mm Size
Abstract Introduction Over the past 15 years, ureteral stone treatment has evolved significantly. Management now depends on stone size, location, composition, patient circu...
A Prospective Randomized Study of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: Uretero-lithotripsy v/s Laparoscopy
A Prospective Randomized Study of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: Uretero-lithotripsy v/s Laparoscopy
Background Upper one third ureteric stones has plethora of treatment, choice being medical expulsive therapy, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), laparoscopic and op...
Renal Decompression for Malignant Ureteric Obstruction: A Tertiary Hospital Cohort Analysis
Renal Decompression for Malignant Ureteric Obstruction: A Tertiary Hospital Cohort Analysis
Background/Objectives: Malignant ureteric obstruction is an increasingly common problem; however, its treatment remains challenging due to associated poor survival and quality of l...

Back to Top