Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Modern Interpretations of Nestorius

View through CrossRef
Nestorius continues to be a problem for modern historians of doctrine. The Problem arose in the fifth century when the church acting at the Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.) anathematized Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople, and pronounced Nestorianism a christological heresy. The decisions of the Council of Ephesus were accepted and re-affirmed at the Fourth (451 A.D.) and Fifth (553 A.D.) Ecumenical Councils. It must be said that “Nestorianism” as a special kind of doctrine could have been condemned as heretical could be called “dyoprosopatism.” But such was not the case. Nestorius was condemned and exiled as a heretic, and he was judged on the basis of certain doctrines which he was accused of holding. From the moment of his excommunication until the present time there have been many expressions of uncertainty as to whether he really taught and believed what was defined and condemned as Nestorianism. Somewhat epigrammatically historians have been asking whether Nestorius himself was a Nestorian.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Modern Interpretations of Nestorius
Description:
Nestorius continues to be a problem for modern historians of doctrine.
The Problem arose in the fifth century when the church acting at the Council of Ephesus (431 A.
D.
) anathematized Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople, and pronounced Nestorianism a christological heresy.
The decisions of the Council of Ephesus were accepted and re-affirmed at the Fourth (451 A.
D.
) and Fifth (553 A.
D.
) Ecumenical Councils.
It must be said that “Nestorianism” as a special kind of doctrine could have been condemned as heretical could be called “dyoprosopatism.
” But such was not the case.
Nestorius was condemned and exiled as a heretic, and he was judged on the basis of certain doctrines which he was accused of holding.
From the moment of his excommunication until the present time there have been many expressions of uncertainty as to whether he really taught and believed what was defined and condemned as Nestorianism.
Somewhat epigrammatically historians have been asking whether Nestorius himself was a Nestorian.

Related Results

Pendekatan Tafsir Modern Interpretasi Teologis, Kultural, dan Logis
Pendekatan Tafsir Modern Interpretasi Teologis, Kultural, dan Logis
This article questions about the modern interpretation approach, namely interpretation. Among the interpretations commonly used in the interpretation of the Koran are textual inter...
Automated Geosteering with Fault Detection and Multi-Solution Tracking
Automated Geosteering with Fault Detection and Multi-Solution Tracking
Abstract Development of autonomous drilling technologies requires the automated analysis and interpretation of Logging While Drilling (LWD) data to optimally land th...
NESTORIUS, CYRILL VE PULCHERIA ÜÇGENİNDE MARYOLOJİ VE NASTURİLİĞİN DOĞUŞU
NESTORIUS, CYRILL VE PULCHERIA ÜÇGENİNDE MARYOLOJİ VE NASTURİLİĞİN DOĞUŞU
Meryem’in tabiatı üzerine V. asrın ilk çeyreğinde başlayan Maryoloji tartışmaları Hristiyanlıktaki ikinci büyük ayrışma olan Nasturiliğin doğuşuna sebep olmuştur. Meryem’in Tanrı’n...
Theodorus van Mopsuestia in Het Kader van de Syrische Dialoog
Theodorus van Mopsuestia in Het Kader van de Syrische Dialoog
Theodore of Mopsuestia and the Syriac Dialogue The Third Syriac Consultation of the Syriac Dialogue between the different Churches of the Syriac traditions took place at Mundelein ...
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
The main recommendations of the panel report can be summarised under five key headings:  HUMANITY The Panel recommends recognition that research in this field should be geared tow...
Interpretations of Ghalib
Interpretations of Ghalib
“Ghalib: A Critical Appreciation of His Poetry and Life” written by Dr Syed Abdul Latif and published in 1928, is the first regular work in English on Mirza Ghalib. In this book, D...
Ihsan as a Core Principle of Filial Piety: A Comparative Thematic Exegesis of Al-Misbah and Al-Munir
Ihsan as a Core Principle of Filial Piety: A Comparative Thematic Exegesis of Al-Misbah and Al-Munir
Objective: This study aims to examine the meaning and relevance of the teachings of birrul walidain (filial piety to one's parents) in modern life through a comparative analysis of...
Entrepreneurship Verses Reinterpretation of Qur’an Surah Quraisy Based on Humanism Hassan Hanafi Theology
Entrepreneurship Verses Reinterpretation of Qur’an Surah Quraisy Based on Humanism Hassan Hanafi Theology
This qualitative research aims to comprehensively determine the gap between classical and contemporary interpretations of Qur’an Surah Quraisy that needs to be decomposed with the ...

Back to Top