Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dexmedetomidine for Lisa Procedure: a Single Center Experience
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory problem of preterm newborns. The preferred way to manage RDS is with Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA), which involves direct laryngoscopy in spontaneously breathing infants. Despite its widespread diffusion, the optimal sedation protocol for LISA remains unclear. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, offers sedative and analgesic properties with minimal respiratory depression. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for analgesia and sedation during the LISA procedure.
Methods
This is a prospective observational study conducted in our tertiary Italian NICU from May 2021 to July 2024. We enrolled preterm neonates aged between 26
+0
to 36
+6
weeks, diagnosed with RDS who required LISA. Dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) was administered intravenously before LISA. Primary outcomes included pain control assessed by Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score, sedation adequacy assessed by Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS), and success rate of the procedure. We also assessed the safety of the procedure evaluating adverse events, such as intubation rates, apneas/desaturations, bradycardia, and hypotension. We divided the newborns into two groups based on a cut-off of 32 weeks.
Results Forty seven preterm newborns received dexmedetomidine. The median (IQR) gestational age, birth weight (grams) and age (hours) at LISA were respectively 29+6 (28+5, 33+1), 1421 (1069-2074), 3(2.5-6). Pain scores indicated adequate pain control during the procedure (NIPS <4 in 76% during laryngoscopy). Mild sedation (N-PASS -2 to -5) was observed in 23% of patients before the procedure, lasting up to 60 minutes. Excessive sedation (N-PASS < -5) occurred in 7% of babies (3 patients). Laryngoscopy conditions were optimal in 90% of neonates (Goldberg score <6). Apnea/desaturation with/without bradycardia occurred in 13% of newborns. Six patients were intubated (13%) within 72 hours after the procedure. Hypotension was noted in 6.4% of patients.
Conclusion
Dexmedetomidine provided effective analgesia and facilitated laryngoscopy but did not consistently achieve mild sedation during LISA. While its safety profile was acceptable, a more rapid-onset sedative may be preferable for this procedure. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish an optimal sedation strategy for LISA in preterm newborns.
Trial registration
Register:
ClinicalTrials.gov, number ID NCT04820101, enregistered 03-29-2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04820101?cond=RDS&term=dexmedetomidine&rank=1#study-record-dates
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Dexmedetomidine for Lisa Procedure: a Single Center Experience
Description:
Abstract
Background
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory problem of preterm newborns.
The preferred way to manage RDS is with Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA), which involves direct laryngoscopy in spontaneously breathing infants.
Despite its widespread diffusion, the optimal sedation protocol for LISA remains unclear.
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, offers sedative and analgesic properties with minimal respiratory depression.
This pilot study evaluates the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for analgesia and sedation during the LISA procedure.
Methods
This is a prospective observational study conducted in our tertiary Italian NICU from May 2021 to July 2024.
We enrolled preterm neonates aged between 26
+0
to 36
+6
weeks, diagnosed with RDS who required LISA.
Dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) was administered intravenously before LISA.
Primary outcomes included pain control assessed by Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score, sedation adequacy assessed by Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS), and success rate of the procedure.
We also assessed the safety of the procedure evaluating adverse events, such as intubation rates, apneas/desaturations, bradycardia, and hypotension.
We divided the newborns into two groups based on a cut-off of 32 weeks.
Results Forty seven preterm newborns received dexmedetomidine.
The median (IQR) gestational age, birth weight (grams) and age (hours) at LISA were respectively 29+6 (28+5, 33+1), 1421 (1069-2074), 3(2.
5-6).
Pain scores indicated adequate pain control during the procedure (NIPS <4 in 76% during laryngoscopy).
Mild sedation (N-PASS -2 to -5) was observed in 23% of patients before the procedure, lasting up to 60 minutes.
Excessive sedation (N-PASS < -5) occurred in 7% of babies (3 patients).
Laryngoscopy conditions were optimal in 90% of neonates (Goldberg score <6).
Apnea/desaturation with/without bradycardia occurred in 13% of newborns.
Six patients were intubated (13%) within 72 hours after the procedure.
Hypotension was noted in 6.
4% of patients.
Conclusion
Dexmedetomidine provided effective analgesia and facilitated laryngoscopy but did not consistently achieve mild sedation during LISA.
While its safety profile was acceptable, a more rapid-onset sedative may be preferable for this procedure.
Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish an optimal sedation strategy for LISA in preterm newborns.
Trial registration
Register:
ClinicalTrials.
gov, number ID NCT04820101, enregistered 03-29-2021, https://clinicaltrials.
gov/study/NCT04820101?cond=RDS&term=dexmedetomidine&rank=1#study-record-dates.
Related Results
Incidence of Fever Associated With Dexmedetomidine in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Incidence of Fever Associated With Dexmedetomidine in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Background:
Published literature has described the temporal relationship of dexmedetomidine with elevated temperatures, but there is limited data to quantify th...
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with ch...
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is increasingly being used in various surgical procedures due to its safety and effectiveness. Tympanoplasty, a common otological proced...
Does the intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine induce bone regeneration in cranial defects at subsedative doses in rabbits?
Does the intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine induce bone regeneration in cranial defects at subsedative doses in rabbits?
Objective:
Dexmedetomidine has been shown to exert protective
and curative effects on various tissues and organs in different
pathological processes. This study a...
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
This randomized clinical trial explores whether hormone intensification at start of androgen deprivation therapy alters selection of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations within ...
Renoprotective effects Of Dexmedetomidine against ischemia-reperfusion injury in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Renoprotective effects Of Dexmedetomidine against ischemia-reperfusion injury in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
Abstract
Background
Diabetic patients are susceptible to renal ischemia-reperfusion injury, which leads to perioperative compli...
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidences of postanesthetic restlessness and hemodynamic fluctuations in children within acceptable ranges. Dexmedetomid...
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Reduction of Emergency Delirium in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Reduction of Emergency Delirium in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy in CMH Muzaffarabad AJK
Background: Emergency delirium (ED) is a common and distressing complication in children recovering from anesthesia, particularly after tonsillectomy. Dexmedetomidine, a selective ...

