Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block during upper limb surgery: A comparative study

View through CrossRef
Background: Various adjuvants are added to local anesthetics to increase the duration of block during supraclavicular brachial plexus (SCBP) block. Dexmedetomidine, a newer and potent alpha2 receptor agonist, has 10 times higher selectivity than clonidine. Many studies have already evaluated the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as perineural adjuvants and have reported wide variations in the prolongation of post-operative analgesia. Some studies have reported the absence of adjuvant’s effect while a few have not focused all the facets of block characteristics. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine during SCBP block for the upper limb surgeries, in terms of duration of post-operative analgesia (Primary outcome). The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, and adverse effects, if any, were observed. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients, aged between 40 and 60 years of either sex, undergoing upper limb surgery, were randomly allocated in to three groups to receive either 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 2 ml saline (Group R, n=30) or 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus clonidine (1 mcg/kg) plus saline to make a total volume 32 ml (Group C, n=30), or 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) plus saline to make a total volume 32 ml (Group D, n=30). The duration of post-operative analgesia, other block characteristics, and adverse events, if any, was assessed. Results: Mean duration of post-operative analgesia was found to be considerably higher in dexmedetomidine group compared with clonidine group and ropivacaine alone group (664.13 vs. 551.77 vs. 465.47, respectively, P<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block was considerably longer in dexmedetomidine group compared with clonidine and control group. Adverse events were comparable among the three groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine appears to be a better alternative to clonidine as adjuvant in terms of prolonged post-operative analgesia and comparable adverse events.
Title: Clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block during upper limb surgery: A comparative study
Description:
Background: Various adjuvants are added to local anesthetics to increase the duration of block during supraclavicular brachial plexus (SCBP) block.
Dexmedetomidine, a newer and potent alpha2 receptor agonist, has 10 times higher selectivity than clonidine.
Many studies have already evaluated the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as perineural adjuvants and have reported wide variations in the prolongation of post-operative analgesia.
Some studies have reported the absence of adjuvant’s effect while a few have not focused all the facets of block characteristics.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine during SCBP block for the upper limb surgeries, in terms of duration of post-operative analgesia (Primary outcome).
The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, and adverse effects, if any, were observed.
Materials and Methods: Ninety patients, aged between 40 and 60 years of either sex, undergoing upper limb surgery, were randomly allocated in to three groups to receive either 30 ml of 0.
5% ropivacaine and 2 ml saline (Group R, n=30) or 30 ml 0.
5% ropivacaine plus clonidine (1 mcg/kg) plus saline to make a total volume 32 ml (Group C, n=30), or 30 ml 0.
5% ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) plus saline to make a total volume 32 ml (Group D, n=30).
The duration of post-operative analgesia, other block characteristics, and adverse events, if any, was assessed.
Results: Mean duration of post-operative analgesia was found to be considerably higher in dexmedetomidine group compared with clonidine group and ropivacaine alone group (664.
13 vs.
551.
77 vs.
465.
47, respectively, P<0.
001).
The duration of sensory and motor block was considerably longer in dexmedetomidine group compared with clonidine and control group.
Adverse events were comparable among the three groups.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine appears to be a better alternative to clonidine as adjuvant in terms of prolonged post-operative analgesia and comparable adverse events.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Phrenic Nerve Block for Management of Post-Thoracic Outlet Decompression Cough: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders arising from compressive forces on the neurovascular bundle in that region due to different etiologies. This...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract Introduction Thoracic duct cysts are an uncommon phenomenon, especially within the cervical region. Due to its limited reported cases, very little is known about its etiol...
STUDY OF BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY
STUDY OF BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY
Introduction The introduction of novel distal nerve transfers has changed the way in which brachial plexus surgery is being performed. Although full recovery of function after brac...

Back to Top