Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Understanding trophic relationships among Caribbean sea urchins
View through CrossRef
The species <em>Echinometra lucunter</em>,<em> Echinometra viridis</em>,<em> Lytechinus variegatus</em>, <em>Tripneustes ventricosus,</em> and <em>Diadema antillarum</em> are the most common sea urchins of littoral habitats in the Caribbean. <em>T. ventricosus</em> and <em>L. variegatus</em> are associated with seagrass beds, while the other three species usually inhabit hardground substrates. Food preferences of these species are well documented and they are commonly accepted as being primarily herbivorous-omnivorous; nevertheless, few of them have previously been characterized isotopically. We used this approach for assessing the isotopic characterization of five echinoids. We established the trophic position of two groups of co-occurring species and quantified the contribution of food resources in the diet of <em>Echinometra lucunter</em>, considered the most common sea urchin in the Caribbean region. The species <em>T. ventricosus</em> and <em>D. antillarum</em> showed the highest values of δ<sup>15</sup>N. Sea urchins exhibited similar values of δ<sup>13</sup>C varying from -11.6 ± 0.63 to -10.4 ± 0.99%. The echinoid <em>E. lucunter</em> displayed the lowest values of carbon, from -15.40 ± 0.76%. Significant differences among species were found for δ<sup>15</sup>N and δ<sup>13</sup>C. Seaweed communities exhibited no differences among sites for overall δ<sup>15</sup>N (F= 1.300, df= 3, p= 0.301), but we found spatial differences for δ<sup>13</sup>C (F= 7.410, df= 3, p= 0.001). The ellipse-based metrics of niche width analysis found that the hardground biotope species (<em>D. antillarum</em>, <em>E. lucunter</em>, and <em>E. viridis</em>) did not overlap each other. Similar results were obtained for the co-occurring species of the seagrass biotope; however, the distance between these species was closer than that of the hardground biotope species. The Bayesian mixing models run for <em>E. lucunter</em> at all four localities found differences in food resources contribution. The algae <em>D. menstrualis</em>, <em>C. crassa</em> and <em>B. triquetrum</em> dominated in CGD; whereas <em>C. nitens</em>, <em>Gracilaria</em> spp., and <em>D. caribaea</em> represented the main contributor algae to the diet of <em>E. lucunter</em> at LQY. In Culebra Island, no dominance of any particular algae was detected in TMD, where six of the eight species exhibited a similar contribution. Similarities in δ<sup>15</sup>N between <em>D. antillarum</em> and <em>T. ventricosus</em> may hint towards a similar trophic level for these species, although <em>T. ventricosus</em> is widely accepted as an omnivore, while <em>D. antillarum </em>is considered a generalist herbivore. The lack of overlap among species in the two biotopes seems to indicate a resource partitioning strategy to avoid niche competition among co-occurring species.
Universidad de Costa Rica
Title: Understanding trophic relationships among Caribbean sea urchins
Description:
The species <em>Echinometra lucunter</em>,<em> Echinometra viridis</em>,<em> Lytechinus variegatus</em>, <em>Tripneustes ventricosus,</em> and <em>Diadema antillarum</em> are the most common sea urchins of littoral habitats in the Caribbean.
<em>T.
ventricosus</em> and <em>L.
variegatus</em> are associated with seagrass beds, while the other three species usually inhabit hardground substrates.
Food preferences of these species are well documented and they are commonly accepted as being primarily herbivorous-omnivorous; nevertheless, few of them have previously been characterized isotopically.
We used this approach for assessing the isotopic characterization of five echinoids.
We established the trophic position of two groups of co-occurring species and quantified the contribution of food resources in the diet of <em>Echinometra lucunter</em>, considered the most common sea urchin in the Caribbean region.
The species <em>T.
ventricosus</em> and <em>D.
antillarum</em> showed the highest values of δ<sup>15</sup>N.
Sea urchins exhibited similar values of δ<sup>13</sup>C varying from -11.
6 ± 0.
63 to -10.
4 ± 0.
99%.
The echinoid <em>E.
lucunter</em> displayed the lowest values of carbon, from -15.
40 ± 0.
76%.
Significant differences among species were found for δ<sup>15</sup>N and δ<sup>13</sup>C.
Seaweed communities exhibited no differences among sites for overall δ<sup>15</sup>N (F= 1.
300, df= 3, p= 0.
301), but we found spatial differences for δ<sup>13</sup>C (F= 7.
410, df= 3, p= 0.
001).
The ellipse-based metrics of niche width analysis found that the hardground biotope species (<em>D.
antillarum</em>, <em>E.
lucunter</em>, and <em>E.
viridis</em>) did not overlap each other.
Similar results were obtained for the co-occurring species of the seagrass biotope; however, the distance between these species was closer than that of the hardground biotope species.
The Bayesian mixing models run for <em>E.
lucunter</em> at all four localities found differences in food resources contribution.
The algae <em>D.
menstrualis</em>, <em>C.
crassa</em> and <em>B.
triquetrum</em> dominated in CGD; whereas <em>C.
nitens</em>, <em>Gracilaria</em> spp.
, and <em>D.
caribaea</em> represented the main contributor algae to the diet of <em>E.
lucunter</em> at LQY.
In Culebra Island, no dominance of any particular algae was detected in TMD, where six of the eight species exhibited a similar contribution.
Similarities in δ<sup>15</sup>N between <em>D.
antillarum</em> and <em>T.
ventricosus</em> may hint towards a similar trophic level for these species, although <em>T.
ventricosus</em> is widely accepted as an omnivore, while <em>D.
antillarum </em>is considered a generalist herbivore.
The lack of overlap among species in the two biotopes seems to indicate a resource partitioning strategy to avoid niche competition among co-occurring species.
Related Results
Interaction among sea urchins in response to food cues
Interaction among sea urchins in response to food cues
AbstractInteraction among sea urchins remains largely uninvestigated, although the aggregation of sea urchins is common. In the present study, 1, 15 and 30 sea urchins Strongylocen...
Tandem reef restoration using corals and sea urchins: Building complex habitat for herbivores
Tandem reef restoration using corals and sea urchins: Building complex habitat for herbivores
Amidst the decline of coral reef ecosystems, restoration practitioners are expanding their focus to incorporate key reef community components, such as grazers, to improve site cond...
Ecological consequences of density-dependence in the sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii
Ecological consequences of density-dependence in the sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii
Herbivory by sea urchins can dictate macroalgal cover on subtidal reefs. The ecological impacts of removing sea urchins on kelp, invertebrates and fishes are well-established, but ...
Distinct realized physiologies in green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) populations from barren and kelp habitats
Distinct realized physiologies in green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) populations from barren and kelp habitats
Overgrazing of habitat-forming kelps by sea urchins is reshaping reef seascapes in many temperate regions. Loss of kelp, in particular as a food source, may alter individual consum...
Refining the trophic diversity, network structure, and bottom‐up importance of prey groups for temperate reef fishes
Refining the trophic diversity, network structure, and bottom‐up importance of prey groups for temperate reef fishes
AbstractMarine fish communities are highly diverse and contribute significantly to ecosystem processes. However, understanding their specific functional roles and the importance of...
Trophic structure and a temporal shift in trophic diversity of mobile consumers in a subarctic estuary
Trophic structure and a temporal shift in trophic diversity of mobile consumers in a subarctic estuary
Abstract
Quantifying trophic relationships within and between species in terms of trophic position, ontogeny, and trophic diversity provides information on community-level ...
Refining the trophic diversity, ecological network structure, and bottom-up importance of prey groups for temperate reef fishes
Refining the trophic diversity, ecological network structure, and bottom-up importance of prey groups for temperate reef fishes
Marine fish communities are highly diverse, including all trophic levels of consumers and contributing to many ecosystem processes. Understanding the specific functional roles of m...
On three types of sea breeze in Qingdao of East China: an observational analysis
On three types of sea breeze in Qingdao of East China: an observational analysis
Our knowledge of sea breeze remains poor in the coastal area of East China, due largely to the high terrain heterogeneity. Five–year (2016–2020) consecutive wind observations from ...

