Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Can Proppants Do More Than Hold The Fracture Open?
View through CrossRef
AbstractIn the 1940's experimental fracture treatments were performed without proppant. However in most formations unpropped fractures heal quickly with no sustained benefit, and in 1947 river sand was introduced as proppant. The first evolution in proppants came in the 1950's, when river sands started to be replaced by higher quality mined sands from Illinois and Texas. This was the early recognition that employing more uniform, rounder, stronger - and ultimately more conductive proppant - produced larger production gains. From this point on efforts concentrated on improving sand performance and finding new propping materials that could cope with harsher conditions. In the 1960's, petroleum engineers incorporated walnut hulls, glass and plastic beads into frac designs. The 1970's saw the introduction of resin coated proppants and the first commercial bauxite based ceramic proppant, followed by low and intermediate density ceramics in the 1980's. However, throughout this time, proppants still served one primary purpose – to prop open the fractures and provide a conductive flowpath for hydrocarbon production.Placement of proppant deep into the formation brings a unique opportunity of conveying new functions, additional to the primary roles of keeping the frac mechanically open and providing a conductive path for production enhancement. For decades most proppant development efforts concentrated on developing proppants that could either cope with higher stress and deliver higher conductivity or improve proppant transport via lower density, while minimal effort was put in adding other functionalities. Recently it has been recognized that other functions can be incorporated into manmade proppants during the industrial manufacturing process, thereby exploiting the placement opportunity. These functions might include assuring flow in the production system, providing reservoir surveillance or monitoring fracture properties.This paper will review the latest technology developments that enable the incorporation of these functions into proppants, including how the new proppant delivered technologies permit users to cost effectively deploy additional functionalities in the initial completion of hydraulically fractured, frac-packed and gravel-packed wells. The paper will also present recent case histories of field implementations of these technologies which illustrate how these high function proppants can reduce overall operating costs, enhance production and diagnose hydraulic fractures.
Title: Can Proppants Do More Than Hold The Fracture Open?
Description:
AbstractIn the 1940's experimental fracture treatments were performed without proppant.
However in most formations unpropped fractures heal quickly with no sustained benefit, and in 1947 river sand was introduced as proppant.
The first evolution in proppants came in the 1950's, when river sands started to be replaced by higher quality mined sands from Illinois and Texas.
This was the early recognition that employing more uniform, rounder, stronger - and ultimately more conductive proppant - produced larger production gains.
From this point on efforts concentrated on improving sand performance and finding new propping materials that could cope with harsher conditions.
In the 1960's, petroleum engineers incorporated walnut hulls, glass and plastic beads into frac designs.
The 1970's saw the introduction of resin coated proppants and the first commercial bauxite based ceramic proppant, followed by low and intermediate density ceramics in the 1980's.
However, throughout this time, proppants still served one primary purpose – to prop open the fractures and provide a conductive flowpath for hydrocarbon production.
Placement of proppant deep into the formation brings a unique opportunity of conveying new functions, additional to the primary roles of keeping the frac mechanically open and providing a conductive path for production enhancement.
For decades most proppant development efforts concentrated on developing proppants that could either cope with higher stress and deliver higher conductivity or improve proppant transport via lower density, while minimal effort was put in adding other functionalities.
Recently it has been recognized that other functions can be incorporated into manmade proppants during the industrial manufacturing process, thereby exploiting the placement opportunity.
These functions might include assuring flow in the production system, providing reservoir surveillance or monitoring fracture properties.
This paper will review the latest technology developments that enable the incorporation of these functions into proppants, including how the new proppant delivered technologies permit users to cost effectively deploy additional functionalities in the initial completion of hydraulically fractured, frac-packed and gravel-packed wells.
The paper will also present recent case histories of field implementations of these technologies which illustrate how these high function proppants can reduce overall operating costs, enhance production and diagnose hydraulic fractures.
Related Results
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Abstract
Fractures are ubiquitous st...
Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
ABSTRACT
Proppant conductivity was usually measured under static or designed proppant concentration. The ISO 13503-5 standard provides specific experimental proce...
Experimental Investigation on the Conductivity of Micro-Frac Dynamic Proppant Transport Process
Experimental Investigation on the Conductivity of Micro-Frac Dynamic Proppant Transport Process
ABSTRACT:
Fractures are primary flow channels of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs; thus, hydraulic fracturing is widely used to promote the productivity of u...
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Abstract
In this paper, a case study in a fractured carbonate reservoir is presented to demonstrate the approach of fracture modeling using fracture intensity vol...
Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
ABSTRACT:
Simultaneous fracturing and zipper fracturing of horizontal wells has rapidly evolved to the development of unconventional oil and gas. The fracture int...
Improved Well Stimulation With Resin-Coated Proppants
Improved Well Stimulation With Resin-Coated Proppants
ABSTRACT
Resin-coated proppants improve well stimulation results by preventing flowback, or fracture evacuation, near the wellbore, a phenomenon that effectively "de...
Epoxy Resin Consolidation System Improves Worker Safety, Chemical Compatibility, and Performance
Epoxy Resin Consolidation System Improves Worker Safety, Chemical Compatibility, and Performance
Abstract
This paper describes the development and field-testing of a new high-temperature epoxy resin system (new HT epoxy) that effectively consolidates sand and...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...

