Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

39-LB: Progress in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing with Standard of Care Therapy Alone: A Meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not standard of care treatment of diabetic foot ulcers has improved over the past 20 years as measured by the percentage of ulcers healed within set periods of time. Previously reported percentages of wound healing were 24% at 12 weeks and 31% at 20 weeks. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to review the control groups of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The mean percentage of ulcers healed at defined end points were then compared to percentages of ulcers healed at corresponding end points reported 20 years ago. A literature search was performed to identify articles published before December 30, 2019, to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that included human subjects with diabetic foot ulcers. The control arm was required to include wound debridement, dressing changes, and offloading. Results: The literature search yielded 16 randomized clinical trials that fit the selection criteria to be included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of the percentage of wounds healed with standard of care therapy alone yielded the following results: 6 weeks (14.9% ± 13.0%), 12 weeks (33.4% ± 18.2%), 20 weeks (43% ± 0%). Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis of the available evidence suggest that the percentage of diabetic foot ulcers healed with standard of care therapies alone have improved over the past 20 years. However, the percentage of ulcers healed at each of these endpoints remains low and demonstrates continued challenges in healing diabetic foot ulcers. Disclosure V.E. Parks: None. P. Crisologo: None. L.A. Lavery: Advisory Panel; Self; Acelity, Bayer AG. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Cardinal Health, EO2 Concepts, Integra LifeSciences, MedImmune, Smith & Nephew. J. Banks: None. M.D. Liette: None. L. Johnson: None.
Title: 39-LB: Progress in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing with Standard of Care Therapy Alone: A Meta-analysis
Description:
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not standard of care treatment of diabetic foot ulcers has improved over the past 20 years as measured by the percentage of ulcers healed within set periods of time.
Previously reported percentages of wound healing were 24% at 12 weeks and 31% at 20 weeks.
Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to review the control groups of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
The mean percentage of ulcers healed at defined end points were then compared to percentages of ulcers healed at corresponding end points reported 20 years ago.
A literature search was performed to identify articles published before December 30, 2019, to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that included human subjects with diabetic foot ulcers.
The control arm was required to include wound debridement, dressing changes, and offloading.
Results: The literature search yielded 16 randomized clinical trials that fit the selection criteria to be included in the meta-analysis.
Analysis of the percentage of wounds healed with standard of care therapy alone yielded the following results: 6 weeks (14.
9% ± 13.
0%), 12 weeks (33.
4% ± 18.
2%), 20 weeks (43% ± 0%).
Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis of the available evidence suggest that the percentage of diabetic foot ulcers healed with standard of care therapies alone have improved over the past 20 years.
However, the percentage of ulcers healed at each of these endpoints remains low and demonstrates continued challenges in healing diabetic foot ulcers.
Disclosure V.
E.
Parks: None.
P.
Crisologo: None.
L.
A.
Lavery: Advisory Panel; Self; Acelity, Bayer AG.
Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Cardinal Health, EO2 Concepts, Integra LifeSciences, MedImmune, Smith & Nephew.
J.
Banks: None.
M.
D.
Liette: None.
L.
Johnson: None.

Related Results

Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in QatarA primary care Perspective Introduction Diabetes represents a major public health burden in developing countries, especially the Arabian Gulf region, which is...
A Study of Chronic Foot Ulcers for diabetic patients
A Study of Chronic Foot Ulcers for diabetic patients
The local factors of the diabetic foot ulcer are peripheral neuropathy, anatomic foot deformity, trauma, improperly fitted shoes, and history of foot ulceration or lower limb elimi...
Revascularization in diabetic foot ulcer and outcome
Revascularization in diabetic foot ulcer and outcome
Background & objective: Diabetes is a major public health problem regionally and globally. The prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in general population of Bangladesh is hi...
Knowledge, behavior and factors related to foot care in diabetes patients at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital
Knowledge, behavior and factors related to foot care in diabetes patients at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital
Introduction: Diabetes can affect every part of the body, including damage to the feet. Diabetes patients with improper knowledge and behavior will develop foot complications. Obje...

Back to Top