Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UROKINASE VS TRISODIUM CITRATE IN PREVENTION OF LUMINAL THROMBOSIS IN TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETERS
View through CrossRef
Background: Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are vital for vascular access in hemodialysis patients but are frequently complicated by luminal thrombosis, leading to catheter dysfunction, reduced dialysis efficiency, and increased morbidity. Effective catheter lock solutions are essential to prevent thrombotic events and maintain long-term catheter patency. While urokinase is widely used for its thrombolytic properties, trisodium citrate has gained attention due to its anticoagulant action and potentially superior safety profile.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of trisodium citrate and urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in tunneled dialysis catheters.
Methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted over 12 months at a tertiary care center. A total of 120 adult hemodialysis patients requiring tunneled dialysis catheter use were enrolled and assigned equally into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received urokinase 5000 IU, and Group 2 (n=60) received trisodium citrate 4% as lock solutions following each dialysis session. The primary outcome was incidence of luminal thrombosis, clinically suspected and confirmed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included catheter survival time without thrombosis, catheter-related infections, mechanical complications, and adverse events. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed where appropriate.
Results: Trisodium citrate group exhibited a significantly lower thrombosis rate of 15% compared to 28% in the urokinase group (p=0.03). Median time to first thrombosis was 9 months in the citrate group versus 6 months in the urokinase group (p=0.02). Catheter survival without thrombosis was higher in the citrate group (85%) than urokinase (72%) (p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in infection (p=0.68) or mechanical complication rates (p=0.99). Local irritation occurred equally in 3.3% of patients in both groups.
Conclusion: Trisodium citrate is more effective than urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in TDCs and supports better catheter survival with a comparable safety profile, making it a practical option for routine clinical use.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UROKINASE VS TRISODIUM CITRATE IN PREVENTION OF LUMINAL THROMBOSIS IN TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETERS
Description:
Background: Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are vital for vascular access in hemodialysis patients but are frequently complicated by luminal thrombosis, leading to catheter dysfunction, reduced dialysis efficiency, and increased morbidity.
Effective catheter lock solutions are essential to prevent thrombotic events and maintain long-term catheter patency.
While urokinase is widely used for its thrombolytic properties, trisodium citrate has gained attention due to its anticoagulant action and potentially superior safety profile.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of trisodium citrate and urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in tunneled dialysis catheters.
Methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted over 12 months at a tertiary care center.
A total of 120 adult hemodialysis patients requiring tunneled dialysis catheter use were enrolled and assigned equally into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received urokinase 5000 IU, and Group 2 (n=60) received trisodium citrate 4% as lock solutions following each dialysis session.
The primary outcome was incidence of luminal thrombosis, clinically suspected and confirmed by ultrasound.
Secondary outcomes included catheter survival time without thrombosis, catheter-related infections, mechanical complications, and adverse events.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.
Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed where appropriate.
Results: Trisodium citrate group exhibited a significantly lower thrombosis rate of 15% compared to 28% in the urokinase group (p=0.
03).
Median time to first thrombosis was 9 months in the citrate group versus 6 months in the urokinase group (p=0.
02).
Catheter survival without thrombosis was higher in the citrate group (85%) than urokinase (72%) (p=0.
04).
No significant differences were observed in infection (p=0.
68) or mechanical complication rates (p=0.
99).
Local irritation occurred equally in 3.
3% of patients in both groups.
Conclusion: Trisodium citrate is more effective than urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in TDCs and supports better catheter survival with a comparable safety profile, making it a practical option for routine clinical use.
Related Results
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Abstract
Introduction
Among the most frequently used anticoagulants in hematological testing are tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), sodium citrate, and sodium heparin. However, there is a n...
Assessment of implementation of the Pradhan Mantri national dialysis Programme in Hospitals in Delhi
Assessment of implementation of the Pradhan Mantri national dialysis Programme in Hospitals in Delhi
Background: Annual-demand for haemodialysis-sessions in India is 3.4 Crores. To make Renal-care-services affordable to APL and free to BPL, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare la...
Determinants of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Implantation Time by Ultrasound Guidance: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
Determinants of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Implantation Time by Ultrasound Guidance: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
Background: We have previously reported that the ultrasound (US)-guided tip positioning is an accurate and safe procedure for placement of retrograde- and antegrade-tunneled hemodi...
#2976 Comparison of standard versus high dose urokinase for dysfunctional tunneled dialysis catheters in haemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial
#2976 Comparison of standard versus high dose urokinase for dysfunctional tunneled dialysis catheters in haemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background and Aims
Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) remain a frequent first-line vascular access for patients...
#3349 METICULOUS CATHETER CARE CAN REDUCE CATHETER-RELATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS SIGNIFICANTLY IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS – A 5-YEAR SINGLE CENTRE STUDY
#3349 METICULOUS CATHETER CARE CAN REDUCE CATHETER-RELATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS SIGNIFICANTLY IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS – A 5-YEAR SINGLE CENTRE STUDY
Abstract
Background and Aims
The use of central venous catheters as hemodialysis (HD) vascular access is a leading contributor t...
Factors Associated With Dialysis Withdrawal In Dialysis Patients
Factors Associated With Dialysis Withdrawal In Dialysis Patients
Abstract
Background: Research on the factors associated with dialysis withdrawal in dialysis patients has been limited. Authors have used different definitions for dialysis...
Randomized, double-blinded multicenter study. Comparison of intracoronary single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator, pro-urokinase (GE-0943), and intracoronary urokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Randomized, double-blinded multicenter study. Comparison of intracoronary single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator, pro-urokinase (GE-0943), and intracoronary urokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Coronary recanalization rates and changes in the coagulation and fibrinolysis system were evaluated in a randomized fashion in patients with acute myocardial infarction after intra...
Basics of Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Placement for Haemodialysis – Single Centre Experience
Basics of Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Placement for Haemodialysis – Single Centre Experience
/non tunneled dialysis catheters or through arteriovenous fistulas/grafts. The tunneled dialysis catheters act as bridge dialysis devices during maturation period of arteriovenous ...

