Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Statehood
View through CrossRef
States are the principal and most fundamental actors in world politics. Although supranational organizations and nonstate actors are growing in importance as a result of globalization, states have been the dominant form of political organization for the last two centuries. Because of the state’s centrality to modern political life, statehood is well studied, much sought after, and hotly contested. Political philosophers disagree about the rationale for the state and the nature of the international system. Political scientists debate the extent to which sovereignty influences political behavior and examine the dynamics of the beginning and end of statehood. In international law, the declaratory and constitutive nature of the state is debated both in theory and in practice. The major divide centers on the extent to which statehood depends on the intrinsic character of the actor or on its external legitimacy in the eyes of other states. Critical cases of claims to sovereignty show that, as a legal matter, statehood is not straightforward. Also, empirically statehood is not homogenous but varied; some present-day members of the international community scarcely resemble one another or, for that matter, the formal legal standards of statehood. Finally, faced with challenges to their sovereign statehood, governments have attempted a number of nonstate alternatives to accommodate diverse populations and other governance challenges.
Title: Statehood
Description:
States are the principal and most fundamental actors in world politics.
Although supranational organizations and nonstate actors are growing in importance as a result of globalization, states have been the dominant form of political organization for the last two centuries.
Because of the state’s centrality to modern political life, statehood is well studied, much sought after, and hotly contested.
Political philosophers disagree about the rationale for the state and the nature of the international system.
Political scientists debate the extent to which sovereignty influences political behavior and examine the dynamics of the beginning and end of statehood.
In international law, the declaratory and constitutive nature of the state is debated both in theory and in practice.
The major divide centers on the extent to which statehood depends on the intrinsic character of the actor or on its external legitimacy in the eyes of other states.
Critical cases of claims to sovereignty show that, as a legal matter, statehood is not straightforward.
Also, empirically statehood is not homogenous but varied; some present-day members of the international community scarcely resemble one another or, for that matter, the formal legal standards of statehood.
Finally, faced with challenges to their sovereign statehood, governments have attempted a number of nonstate alternatives to accommodate diverse populations and other governance challenges.
Related Results
Statehood: A Grotian Moment 2
Statehood: A Grotian Moment 2
Abstract
Grotian Moments are instances of accelerated formation of customary law, sparked by significant world events, such as wars, terrorism attacks, developments in technology, ...
Palestine Made Flesh
Palestine Made Flesh
In a 1998 opinion piece for Egyptian weekly Al Ahram, Edward Said memorably skewered Yasser Arafat’s intention to issue his second declaration of Palestinian statehood within a yea...
United/States: A Revolutionary History of American Statehood
United/States: A Revolutionary History of American Statehood
Where did states come from? Almost everyone thinks that states descended immediately, originally, and directly from British colonies, while only afterward joining together as the U...
Nadir Shah's determination to statehood
Nadir Shah's determination to statehood
The article "Nadir Shah's determination to statehood" is a scientific analysis of Nadir Shah's legacy of statehood, his historical perspectives, and state-building resources in gen...
Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky and the Development of Russian Legal Statehood in the 21st Century
Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky and the Development of Russian Legal Statehood in the 21st Century
The paper is devoted to the 250th anniversary of the outstanding statesman of Russia Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky. The authors set the task in a short essay to combine the analys...
Státnost druhé republiky a její tvůrci
Státnost druhé republiky a její tvůrci
Doc. PhDr. Jan Rataj, CSc., of the Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, presented an article called “Statehood of the Second Republic and Its Creators”. He ...
Statehood à la Carte
Statehood à la Carte
AbstractThis chapter synthesizes the main findings about the practice of Statehood à la carte and defends them against anticipated criticisms: that Caribbean and Pacific countries ...
In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon judgment of the German Constitutional Court
In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon judgment of the German Constitutional Court
In its judgment on the Lisbon Treaty, the German constitutional court presents a comprehensive assessment of European integration. While the evaluation of the Lisbon Treaty assumes...

