Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

RESPONSE OF WHEAT–RICE AND MAIZE/MILLET SYSTEMS TO FERTILIZER AND MANURE APPLICATIONS IN THE MID-HILLS OF NEPAL

View through CrossRef
Farmers in the mid-hills of Nepal have a mix of rainfed land on which millet is grown in relay after maize (maize/millet), and irrigated land on which wheat is grown sequentially after rice (wheat–rice). Double cropping is the norm but the diminishing quantities of organic materials, coupled with the trend towards increased use of inorganic fertilizers, have raised questions about the long-term productivity and sustainability of the cropping systems. The aim of this work was to examine the long-term effects (eight years) on grain yield of additions of manure and fertilizer either singly or in combination. Maize/millet and wheat–rice rotations were established on a Dystochrept at Pakhribas Agricultural Centre at about 1450 m altitude. Manure and fertilizer applications were applied to the maize (eight combinations in May) and the wheat (different rates in seven combinations in November) every year with the succeeding crops (millet and rice) utilizing residual nutrients. Yields of maize, millet and rice were greater when manure rather than fertilizer was applied but yields of wheat were less. The combined application of manure and fertilizer significantly increased yields of maize and wheat compared with applications of either manure or fertilizer alone. However, for the subsequent crops (millet and rice) there was either a small residual benefit of the combined application when compared with fertilizer alone, or no benefit when compared with manure alone. Overall, the combined application increased total grain yields by about 35% in the maize/millet rotation and by 16% in the wheat–rice rotation. There was no trend in yields in response to treatment with time.
Title: RESPONSE OF WHEAT–RICE AND MAIZE/MILLET SYSTEMS TO FERTILIZER AND MANURE APPLICATIONS IN THE MID-HILLS OF NEPAL
Description:
Farmers in the mid-hills of Nepal have a mix of rainfed land on which millet is grown in relay after maize (maize/millet), and irrigated land on which wheat is grown sequentially after rice (wheat–rice).
Double cropping is the norm but the diminishing quantities of organic materials, coupled with the trend towards increased use of inorganic fertilizers, have raised questions about the long-term productivity and sustainability of the cropping systems.
The aim of this work was to examine the long-term effects (eight years) on grain yield of additions of manure and fertilizer either singly or in combination.
Maize/millet and wheat–rice rotations were established on a Dystochrept at Pakhribas Agricultural Centre at about 1450 m altitude.
Manure and fertilizer applications were applied to the maize (eight combinations in May) and the wheat (different rates in seven combinations in November) every year with the succeeding crops (millet and rice) utilizing residual nutrients.
Yields of maize, millet and rice were greater when manure rather than fertilizer was applied but yields of wheat were less.
The combined application of manure and fertilizer significantly increased yields of maize and wheat compared with applications of either manure or fertilizer alone.
However, for the subsequent crops (millet and rice) there was either a small residual benefit of the combined application when compared with fertilizer alone, or no benefit when compared with manure alone.
Overall, the combined application increased total grain yields by about 35% in the maize/millet rotation and by 16% in the wheat–rice rotation.
There was no trend in yields in response to treatment with time.

Related Results

Composting for Feedlot Manure Management and Soil Quality
Composting for Feedlot Manure Management and Soil Quality
Contemporary industrialized grain and livestock production is Characterized by efficient, large‐scale confined animal feedlot operations (CAFOs) and equally efficient and large‐sca...
Evaluating Intercropping Limitations of Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.), Pearl Millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.), and Maize (Zea Mays L.)
Evaluating Intercropping Limitations of Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.), Pearl Millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.), and Maize (Zea Mays L.)
Fodder scarcity is a main problem in boosting of livestock sector. Hypothesis was made in order to increase fodder yield per unit of land by intercropping of cowpeas, pearl millet ...
[RETRACTED] Hazel Hills CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Hazel Hills CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]➢Product Review:— ????Hazel Hills CBD Gummies ➢Used For —????Pain Relief➢Main Benefits: —????Improve Metabolism & Help in Pain Relief➢Composition: —????NaturalOrg...
[RETRACTED] Hazel Hills CBD Gummies Reviews v1
[RETRACTED] Hazel Hills CBD Gummies Reviews v1
[RETRACTED]➢Product Review:— ????Hazel Hills CBD Gummies ➢Used For —????Pain Relief➢Main Benefits: —????Improve Metabolism & Help in Pain Relief➢Composition: —????NaturalOrg...
Evaluation of Alternative Break Crops in Rotation with Bread Wheat (triticum aestivum l.) in South-Eastern Ethiopia
Evaluation of Alternative Break Crops in Rotation with Bread Wheat (triticum aestivum l.) in South-Eastern Ethiopia
Crop rotation could be a possible intervention to resolve multifaceted problems of monoculture. In recent years, there is a concern about soil depletion caused by intensive farming...
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Relay intercropping soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] into winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) may increase soybean yields compared with doublecropping. Once the soybean crop is esta...

Back to Top