Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Knowledge of and preference for abortion legality in Kenya: A National Cross- Sectional Survey
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Inadequate knowledge of abortion laws implies those seeking care cannot know their legal entitlements, service providers cannot practice with legal protection, and governments can escape legal responsibility for the adverse effects of their laws. There is limited understanding of the public’s views of abortion in Kenya. This study assessed the knowledge and preference for abortion legality in Kenya.
Methods
We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey using mobile telephones to collect data from adults 18 or older. The sample was drawn from a database owned by a mobile-survey provider with over 12 million telephone numbers across Kenya. We used a random digit dialing approach to select and recruit participants. Trained research assistants administered telephonic interviews using a structured questionnaires that had questions assessing knowledge of conditions for legally sanctioned abortion and their preferences for conditions the law should permit. We summarized continuous variables into means with standard deviations while categorical variables into proportions. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between knowledge of abortion laws and independent variables.
Results
Of the 8942 respondents, 76%, 74%, and 33% correctly knew that the Kenyan law allows abortion when a woman's life and health are at risk and when the pregnancy results from rape, respectively. Being female (AOR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.09–1.38]; p < 0.001), age group 25–34 (1.21 [1.03–1.43]; 0.024) and having university education (2.57; [1.79–3.70]; <0.001) were associated with higher knowledge of abortion laws. Majority of respondents preferred that the law allow abortion when a woman’s life (72%) or health (65%) or mental health (43%) is at risk. One-quarter wanted abortions allowed for rape (29%) and incest (28%) while only 15% approved abortion if the pregnant was unwanted. The latent class analysis characterized that most respondents were conditional supporters of abortion legalization (43%), whereas individuals opposed to abortion legalization in all/most circumstances represented 29% of respondents.
Conclusion
Information on abortion legality preferences offers insights into public acceptability and opportunities for abortion legal and policy reforms. There is need for comprehensive dissemination of the Kenya abortion law, focusing specifically on groups and communities that typically struggle to access information and services.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Knowledge of and preference for abortion legality in Kenya: A National Cross- Sectional Survey
Description:
Abstract
Background
Inadequate knowledge of abortion laws implies those seeking care cannot know their legal entitlements, service providers cannot practice with legal protection, and governments can escape legal responsibility for the adverse effects of their laws.
There is limited understanding of the public’s views of abortion in Kenya.
This study assessed the knowledge and preference for abortion legality in Kenya.
Methods
We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey using mobile telephones to collect data from adults 18 or older.
The sample was drawn from a database owned by a mobile-survey provider with over 12 million telephone numbers across Kenya.
We used a random digit dialing approach to select and recruit participants.
Trained research assistants administered telephonic interviews using a structured questionnaires that had questions assessing knowledge of conditions for legally sanctioned abortion and their preferences for conditions the law should permit.
We summarized continuous variables into means with standard deviations while categorical variables into proportions.
Multivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between knowledge of abortion laws and independent variables.
Results
Of the 8942 respondents, 76%, 74%, and 33% correctly knew that the Kenyan law allows abortion when a woman's life and health are at risk and when the pregnancy results from rape, respectively.
Being female (AOR = 1.
22 [95% CI: 1.
09–1.
38]; p < 0.
001), age group 25–34 (1.
21 [1.
03–1.
43]; 0.
024) and having university education (2.
57; [1.
79–3.
70]; <0.
001) were associated with higher knowledge of abortion laws.
Majority of respondents preferred that the law allow abortion when a woman’s life (72%) or health (65%) or mental health (43%) is at risk.
One-quarter wanted abortions allowed for rape (29%) and incest (28%) while only 15% approved abortion if the pregnant was unwanted.
The latent class analysis characterized that most respondents were conditional supporters of abortion legalization (43%), whereas individuals opposed to abortion legalization in all/most circumstances represented 29% of respondents.
Conclusion
Information on abortion legality preferences offers insights into public acceptability and opportunities for abortion legal and policy reforms.
There is need for comprehensive dissemination of the Kenya abortion law, focusing specifically on groups and communities that typically struggle to access information and services.
Related Results
Global Epidemiology of Induced Abortion
Global Epidemiology of Induced Abortion
Induced abortion is a common reproductive experience, with more than 73 million abortions occurring each year globally. Worldwide, the annual abortion incidence decreased in the 19...
Physicians' abortion attitudes and intentions regarding future practice
Physicians' abortion attitudes and intentions regarding future practice
Since abortion became legal in the U.S. in 1973, the number of abortions performed annually has been relatively stable, while the number of abortion providers has drastically decre...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Women Leaders Perceived Barriers and Consequences of Safe Abortion in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study
Women Leaders Perceived Barriers and Consequences of Safe Abortion in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Between 2010 and 2014, approximately 25 million unsafe abortions were performed annually across the globe. Africa alone accounted for 29% of all unsafe...
Knowledge of abortion legality among health facility staff in Ghana
Knowledge of abortion legality among health facility staff in Ghana
Background
Abortion has been legal for multiple indications in Ghana since 1985, and efforts have been made to expand the availability of safe abortion care in the years since. How...
Intentions for post-abortion contraceptive use among women who received abortion services in health facilities of Harar city and Dire Dawa city
Intentions for post-abortion contraceptive use among women who received abortion services in health facilities of Harar city and Dire Dawa city
BackgroundA woman's specific beliefs about contraceptives influence her engagement and adherence to these methods. The intention to use post-abortion contraceptive methods is a cri...
5.L. Round table: Gaining or losing ground? Leveraging social innovation to improve abortion access in Europe
5.L. Round table: Gaining or losing ground? Leveraging social innovation to improve abortion access in Europe
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health services are fundamental to ensuring a wide range of human rights, including the right...

