Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques

View through CrossRef
With the increase in the number of universities in recent years, university rankings, which evaluate the success and development of universities, have become significantly important. These rankings are determined by various parameters and their corresponding weights, established through an inter-university ranking system based on verifiable data used for academic evaluation. The rapid rise of universities in global rankings is driven by growing academic, student, and parent interest. However, these rankings often fail to reflect the true desires of students and do not always adequately measure academic productivity. This study aims to determine the steps Turkish universities should take to improve their standing in these ranking systems, using both global and national data. In the research, the academic performance of 20 research universities in Türkiye in 2022 was evaluated and compared based on the weight of 8 criteria. The criterion weights were calculated using the Entropy method, and performance rankings were calculated using the PROMETHEE method. The results were presented in a table showing the performance rankings of these universities across the 8 criteria, and the competitive priorities of the universities were interpreted in relation to their performances. The study found that, among the eight criteria determining the performance of research universities in Türkiye, the criterion with the highest weight was the number of faculty members per student, while the criterion with the lowest weight was the number of citations. The academic performance rankings of the 20 Turkish research universities were as follows: Hacettepe, Gazi, Ege, İstanbul, Ankara, Cerrahpaşa, İTÜ, Gebze Teknik, METU, Dokuz Eylül, KTÜ, Atatürk, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji, Boğaziçi, Marmara, Fırat, Erciyes, Yıldız Teknik, Çukurova, and Uludağ universities.
Title: Comparative Analysis of the Academic Performance of Research Universities in Türkiye Using MCDM Techniques
Description:
With the increase in the number of universities in recent years, university rankings, which evaluate the success and development of universities, have become significantly important.
These rankings are determined by various parameters and their corresponding weights, established through an inter-university ranking system based on verifiable data used for academic evaluation.
The rapid rise of universities in global rankings is driven by growing academic, student, and parent interest.
However, these rankings often fail to reflect the true desires of students and do not always adequately measure academic productivity.
This study aims to determine the steps Turkish universities should take to improve their standing in these ranking systems, using both global and national data.
In the research, the academic performance of 20 research universities in Türkiye in 2022 was evaluated and compared based on the weight of 8 criteria.
The criterion weights were calculated using the Entropy method, and performance rankings were calculated using the PROMETHEE method.
The results were presented in a table showing the performance rankings of these universities across the 8 criteria, and the competitive priorities of the universities were interpreted in relation to their performances.
The study found that, among the eight criteria determining the performance of research universities in Türkiye, the criterion with the highest weight was the number of faculty members per student, while the criterion with the lowest weight was the number of citations.
The academic performance rankings of the 20 Turkish research universities were as follows: Hacettepe, Gazi, Ege, İstanbul, Ankara, Cerrahpaşa, İTÜ, Gebze Teknik, METU, Dokuz Eylül, KTÜ, Atatürk, İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji, Boğaziçi, Marmara, Fırat, Erciyes, Yıldız Teknik, Çukurova, and Uludağ universities.

Related Results

Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
The Review of Applications of Decision-making Techniques in Supply Chain Management
The Review of Applications of Decision-making Techniques in Supply Chain Management
Objective: The objective of the article is to provide a systematic literature review of Multi-criteria Decision-making (MCDM) techniques in supply chain and logistics management. I...
Communication policy of Kharkiv universities in social networks
Communication policy of Kharkiv universities in social networks
The purpose of this paper is to examine the universities’ presence on the social media as a part of universities’ communication policy and to define the most popular social media w...
Assessing university performance and strategic paths in the presence of multiple objectives
Assessing university performance and strategic paths in the presence of multiple objectives
Competitiveness and excellence heavily rely on the capacity of regions to innovate and transfer knowledge from academic institutions to society. In a scenario where these values ac...
TÜRKİYE-İRAN GÖÇ SİSTEMİ: SÜREKLİLİK VE DEĞİŞİMLER
TÜRKİYE-İRAN GÖÇ SİSTEMİ: SÜREKLİLİK VE DEĞİŞİMLER
Amaç: Son yıllarda Türkiye’ye dair göç çalışmalarında ciddi bir artış gözlense de Türkiye-İran göç koridoruna dair araştırmalar sınırlı sayıdadır. Bu makalede Türkiye-İran Göç sist...
A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions
A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions
This research paper presents a comprehensive review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, encompassing their advancements, applications, and future directions. The s...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Influence of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Performance of Public Universities in Kenya
Influence of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Performance of Public Universities in Kenya
Purpose: The objective of the study was to determine the effect of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices (SHRMPs) on performance of public universities. Methodology: ...

Back to Top