Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Virginia Woolf, Lytton Strachey, Harold Nicolson and the Aesthetics of the Subject in the New Biography

View through CrossRef
The New Biography emerged in the 1920s and 1930s under the impulse of Virginia Woolf, Lytton Strachey and Harold Nicolson. Although their appreciation of each other varied, these writers read and influenced each other’s work; they formulated similar conceptualisations of biography, giving strength to Woolf’s idea of a ‘new school of biographies’ (Woolf 1927, 475). In recent years, researchers such as Max Saunders and Laura Marcus have asserted the importance of the New Biography in understanding and reassessing the status of auto/biographical forms in modernist texts. This paper seeks to show that the New Biography developed a specific aesthetics of the biographical subject, contributing to the politics of the modernist self in the early twentieth century. I argue that this aesthetics is mainly motivated by the centrality of personality and the necessarily subjective perception of that personality. In these narratives, personality is the main plot device, driving the story forward, and providing a rationale for the life trajectory. It is a common practice to define the modernist self in terms of its de-centredness and its fragmented nature, and this clarifies why the New Biographers sought to find techniques that create oblique and blurred visualisations of their subjects. Visuality, in this paper, concerns perspective and the biographer’s staging of the performance of perception, as mirrored in the eyes of secondary subjects, and in those of the biographer him/herself. Anchoring my study to the theories of historian and philosopher Frank Ankersmit on the assessment of truth in historical representations, I argue that this mirror effect is used by the New Biographers to highlight the constructedness of all visions of the subject. This subsequently subverts the reliability of the narrative, but also accounts for the artistic dimension of the biography, and intensifies the complex interconnections between literature and historiography.
Title: Virginia Woolf, Lytton Strachey, Harold Nicolson and the Aesthetics of the Subject in the New Biography
Description:
The New Biography emerged in the 1920s and 1930s under the impulse of Virginia Woolf, Lytton Strachey and Harold Nicolson.
Although their appreciation of each other varied, these writers read and influenced each other’s work; they formulated similar conceptualisations of biography, giving strength to Woolf’s idea of a ‘new school of biographies’ (Woolf 1927, 475).
In recent years, researchers such as Max Saunders and Laura Marcus have asserted the importance of the New Biography in understanding and reassessing the status of auto/biographical forms in modernist texts.
This paper seeks to show that the New Biography developed a specific aesthetics of the biographical subject, contributing to the politics of the modernist self in the early twentieth century.
I argue that this aesthetics is mainly motivated by the centrality of personality and the necessarily subjective perception of that personality.
In these narratives, personality is the main plot device, driving the story forward, and providing a rationale for the life trajectory.
It is a common practice to define the modernist self in terms of its de-centredness and its fragmented nature, and this clarifies why the New Biographers sought to find techniques that create oblique and blurred visualisations of their subjects.
Visuality, in this paper, concerns perspective and the biographer’s staging of the performance of perception, as mirrored in the eyes of secondary subjects, and in those of the biographer him/herself.
Anchoring my study to the theories of historian and philosopher Frank Ankersmit on the assessment of truth in historical representations, I argue that this mirror effect is used by the New Biographers to highlight the constructedness of all visions of the subject.
This subsequently subverts the reliability of the narrative, but also accounts for the artistic dimension of the biography, and intensifies the complex interconnections between literature and historiography.

Related Results

Lytton Strachey, a Rebellious Man of Peculiarity: A Review of Holroyd’s Lytton Strachey: The New Biography
Lytton Strachey, a Rebellious Man of Peculiarity: A Review of Holroyd’s Lytton Strachey: The New Biography
<p><em>Lytton Strachey: The New Biography </em>is an important biography by Michael Holroyd, portraying the extraordinary life of Lytton Strachey, who is also a b...
The Transfer of the New Biography: Virginia Woolf and Lytton Strachey in Interwar Poland
The Transfer of the New Biography: Virginia Woolf and Lytton Strachey in Interwar Poland
This article presents the cultural transfer of the new biography, which attracted avid interest in interwar Poland. It reconstructs how modernist publishing networks circulated Vir...
Thinking Back through Virginia Woolf: Woolf as Portal in Lidia Yuknavitch’s The Small Backs of Children
Thinking Back through Virginia Woolf: Woolf as Portal in Lidia Yuknavitch’s The Small Backs of Children
“I am not Virginia Woolf,” a character exclaims in Lidia Yuknavitch’s award-winning novel The Small Backs of Children (2015). But who among us is? If we are women writers, particul...
Crafting the new biography : Virginia Woolf, Harold Nicolson and Lytton Strachey
Crafting the new biography : Virginia Woolf, Harold Nicolson and Lytton Strachey
. : . En confrontant théorie et praxis de trois biographes modernistes, Virginia Woolf, Lytton Strachey et Harold Nicolson, dans les années 20 et 30, ce projet prop...
Contemporary Biographies of Virginia Woolf for Young Readers
Contemporary Biographies of Virginia Woolf for Young Readers
This article explores how modern biographies reinterpret Virginia Woolf’s life, aesthetics, and legacy through text and images, focusing on three works: the picturebooks Virginia W...
Virginia Woolf: A Sound Investment
Virginia Woolf: A Sound Investment
On April 12, 1937 Virginia Woolf became a star. The occasion: her appearance on the cover of Time magazine; the impetus: the publication of her new novel, The Years. For the anon...
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...

Back to Top