Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of single-dose and split-dose fecal tagging with iohexol in computed tomographic colonography

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: Proper fecal tagging allows for high-quality computed tomography colonography. However, there is no single tagging scheme. Therefore, the effects of a contrast enhancement regimen on fecal tagging should be evaluated. AIM: This study aimed to compare the quality of single-dose fecal tagging with that of split-dose fecal tagging with iohexol during computed tomographic colonography and to assess the impact of these regimens on procedure tolerability. METHODS: In this retrospective, selective, single-center study, the patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received single-dose (group 1) or split-dose (group 2) fecal tagging. Both groups received 50 mL of the iodine-containing contrast agent iohexol, with iodine concentration of 350 mg/mL. The residual liquid density was assessed using three parameters: maximum, minimum, and mean values. Additionally, the residual fluid homogeneity was assessed by calculating the mean standard deviation within the region of interest. Tolerability of preparation for colonography was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: The final sample included 338 patients: 116 in group 1 and 222 in group 2. The mean, minimum, and maximum density values in group 2 were significantly higher than those in group 1: 943 [722; 1245], 753 [525; 1082], and 1079 HU [801; 1456] versus 681 [420; 907], 570 [374; 820], and 825 HU [496; 1154], respectively (p 0.001). The residual fluid homogeneity was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1: 59 [46; 78] versus 67 HU [54; 81] (р = 0.012). Group 2 showed a significantly lower subjective difficulty of preparation than did group 1: 4 [2; 6] and 5 [4; 7], respectively (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: A single dose of 50 mL of iohexol (iodine concentration: 350 mg/mL) provides higher-quality fecal tagging than a split-dose provides because of higher residual fluid density with maintained homogeneity. Moreover, single-dose tagging was found to be more tolerable.
Title: Comparison of single-dose and split-dose fecal tagging with iohexol in computed tomographic colonography
Description:
BACKGROUND: Proper fecal tagging allows for high-quality computed tomography colonography.
However, there is no single tagging scheme.
Therefore, the effects of a contrast enhancement regimen on fecal tagging should be evaluated.
AIM: This study aimed to compare the quality of single-dose fecal tagging with that of split-dose fecal tagging with iohexol during computed tomographic colonography and to assess the impact of these regimens on procedure tolerability.
METHODS: In this retrospective, selective, single-center study, the patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received single-dose (group 1) or split-dose (group 2) fecal tagging.
Both groups received 50 mL of the iodine-containing contrast agent iohexol, with iodine concentration of 350 mg/mL.
The residual liquid density was assessed using three parameters: maximum, minimum, and mean values.
Additionally, the residual fluid homogeneity was assessed by calculating the mean standard deviation within the region of interest.
Tolerability of preparation for colonography was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale.
RESULTS: The final sample included 338 patients: 116 in group 1 and 222 in group 2.
The mean, minimum, and maximum density values in group 2 were significantly higher than those in group 1: 943 [722; 1245], 753 [525; 1082], and 1079 HU [801; 1456] versus 681 [420; 907], 570 [374; 820], and 825 HU [496; 1154], respectively (p 0.
001).
The residual fluid homogeneity was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1: 59 [46; 78] versus 67 HU [54; 81] (р = 0.
012).
Group 2 showed a significantly lower subjective difficulty of preparation than did group 1: 4 [2; 6] and 5 [4; 7], respectively (p = 0.
004).
CONCLUSION: A single dose of 50 mL of iohexol (iodine concentration: 350 mg/mL) provides higher-quality fecal tagging than a split-dose provides because of higher residual fluid density with maintained homogeneity.
Moreover, single-dose tagging was found to be more tolerable.

Related Results

Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Iohexol Measures Changing Glomerular Filtration Rate in Critically Ill Patients
Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Iohexol Measures Changing Glomerular Filtration Rate in Critically Ill Patients
Objective: Measurement of changing glomerular filtration rate in acute kidney injury remains problematic. We have previously used a continuous infusion of low-dose Iohe...
A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses
A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses
Abstract Total fecal collection studies to determine digestibility of nutrients are costly and laborious. The use of externally dosed indigestible markers, such a...
Estimation of Tag Shedding and Reporting Rates for Lake Erie Jaw-Tagged Walleyes
Estimation of Tag Shedding and Reporting Rates for Lake Erie Jaw-Tagged Walleyes
Abstract Since 1990, walleyes Sander vitreus in Lake Erie have been tagged annually with jaw tags to better understand the population dynamics and ecological charact...
CT- and MR Colonography
CT- and MR Colonography
Background: Colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cancer and adenomas are widely accepted as precursors to colorectal cancer. Diagnosis and removal of a...
Strategies for improving the precision of fishing and natural mortality estimates from multiyear tagging models: a case study
Strategies for improving the precision of fishing and natural mortality estimates from multiyear tagging models: a case study
Fisheries scientists and managers want precise estimates of fishing and natural mortality for assessments and management decisions. Because tagging can be an expensive option, maxi...
Iohexol et fonction rénale en réanimation : contribution diagnostique et toxicité
Iohexol et fonction rénale en réanimation : contribution diagnostique et toxicité
En réanimation, il n’existe pas de gold standard pour estimer le débit de filtration glomérulaire (DFG). Nous avons mesuré la clairance du iohexol chez 20 patients en insuffisance ...
Part of speech tagging: a systematic review of deep learning and machine learning approaches
Part of speech tagging: a systematic review of deep learning and machine learning approaches
AbstractNatural language processing (NLP) tools have sparked a great deal of interest due to rapid improvements in information and communications technologies. As a result, many di...

Back to Top