Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock (TRICYCLE)—Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

View through CrossRef
Introduction The main mechanism of hypotension in septic shock is persistent vasodilation secondary to vascular hyporeactivity despite high endogenous catecholamine levels and despite endogenous activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The classic stepwise approach involves initiation of norepinephrine, up-titration of the dosage to achieve a specified mean arterial pressure and moving to a second-line vasopressor if the patient remains refractory to norepinephrine. This approach often leads to prolonged states of hypoperfusion and high dose catecholamine exposure and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Given the multifactorial basis of vasodilation in septic shock there is a strong physiological rationale for the early introduction of a multimodal vasopressor strategy that would provide a more physiologically guided approach. This study will compare the effects of a classic stepwise vs. an early balanced multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock. Methods This is a single blind randomized Phase II study. Patients with septic shock will be randomly assigned to control (classic stepwise vasopressor administration, n = 40) versus interventional (balanced multimodal vasopressor administration, n = 40) groups. The study employs a superiority trial design. Patients in the control group will be started on norepinephrine followed by vasopressin. Additional vasoactive drugs will be added as per the clinical team’s decision. In the interventional group, patients will simultaneously receive norepinephrine, angiotensin II and vasopressin at equipotent starting doses. We hypothesize that balanced multimodal vasopressor administration will result in a significant decrease in renin levels compared to the conventional stepwise strategy. Several secondary and exploratory outcome measures will be investigated. Univariate statistical tests with generalized linear modeling will be used to test for significant differences between the groups. Discussion The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test the clinical efficacy of an early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock. It aims to provide new insights and contribute to improved management of vasodilatory states. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06155812.
Title: Early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock (TRICYCLE)—Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
Description:
Introduction The main mechanism of hypotension in septic shock is persistent vasodilation secondary to vascular hyporeactivity despite high endogenous catecholamine levels and despite endogenous activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
The classic stepwise approach involves initiation of norepinephrine, up-titration of the dosage to achieve a specified mean arterial pressure and moving to a second-line vasopressor if the patient remains refractory to norepinephrine.
This approach often leads to prolonged states of hypoperfusion and high dose catecholamine exposure and is associated with poor clinical outcomes.
Given the multifactorial basis of vasodilation in septic shock there is a strong physiological rationale for the early introduction of a multimodal vasopressor strategy that would provide a more physiologically guided approach.
This study will compare the effects of a classic stepwise vs.
an early balanced multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock.
Methods This is a single blind randomized Phase II study.
Patients with septic shock will be randomly assigned to control (classic stepwise vasopressor administration, n = 40) versus interventional (balanced multimodal vasopressor administration, n = 40) groups.
The study employs a superiority trial design.
Patients in the control group will be started on norepinephrine followed by vasopressin.
Additional vasoactive drugs will be added as per the clinical team’s decision.
In the interventional group, patients will simultaneously receive norepinephrine, angiotensin II and vasopressin at equipotent starting doses.
We hypothesize that balanced multimodal vasopressor administration will result in a significant decrease in renin levels compared to the conventional stepwise strategy.
Several secondary and exploratory outcome measures will be investigated.
Univariate statistical tests with generalized linear modeling will be used to test for significant differences between the groups.
Discussion The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test the clinical efficacy of an early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock.
It aims to provide new insights and contribute to improved management of vasodilatory states.
Trial registration ClinicalTrials.
gov NCT06155812.

Related Results

INITIATION TIMING OF VASOPRESSOR IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
INITIATION TIMING OF VASOPRESSOR IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT Background: Vasopressor plays a crucial role in septic shock. However, the time for vasopressor initiation remains controversial. We ...
Differential gene expression analysis reveals novel genes and pathways in pediatric septic shock patients
Differential gene expression analysis reveals novel genes and pathways in pediatric septic shock patients
Abstract Septic shock is a severe health condition caused by uncontrolled sepsis. Advancements in the high-throughput sequencing techniques have risen the number of...
Yiqi Fumai Injection for patients with Septic Shock: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Yiqi Fumai Injection for patients with Septic Shock: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background: Septic shock is an important problem in critical care medicine and one of the leading causes of death in intensive care units (ICU). In China, Traditio...
Predictors of Septic Shock Mortality at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Study
Predictors of Septic Shock Mortality at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Study
Abstract Background: Septic shock causes significant mortality, ranging from 30% to 50%, with a slight difference in developing and developed countries. There is insufficie...
Metaraminol and Noradrenaline in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Comparison
Metaraminol and Noradrenaline in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Comparison
Abstract IntroductionVasopressor use is an important facet of septic shock management, in order to maintain hemodynamic targets and end organ perfusion. Traditionally, Nora...
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Mental health has become one of the most urgent global health issues of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports tha...
Mortality rates in pediatric septic shock
Mortality rates in pediatric septic shock
Background Septic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children admitted to the intensive care unit. Recent investigations from developed countries have report...

Back to Top