Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

(218) EFFECT OF MICROSURGICAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SEX HORMONES LEVELS

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Varicocele is defined as abnormal dilation of the internal spermatic veins due to incompetent venous valves, leading to venous reflux. This condition is found in 15% of all men, and its prevalence increases to 40% in men with primary infertility and to 80% in men with secondary infertility. Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated that this condition might impair Leydig cell function, and that varicocele repair can improve testosterone production. Objective To evaluate the effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy (MV) on serum sex hormone levels in infertile men with varicocele. Methods We reviewed a database of infertile men with palpable varicocele who underwent MV performed by a single surgeon and identified men who had preoperative and postoperative serum sex hormone data available. Total testosterone (TT), estradiol, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in real-time by a solid-phase chemiluminescent immunoassay, while free testosterone (FT) levels were calculated using the validated formula of Vermeulen. The testosterone/estradiol ratio was also calculated. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the variables before and after MV. Significance was set at p < 0.05. We performed a subanalysis including only participants with TT levels less than 300 ng/dL. Results Overall, we included 132 participants. When analyzing the entire cohort, there was a decrease in postoperative luteinizing hormone levels compared to baseline (4.8 vs. 5.2 mUI/mL, p < 0.05), and no statistically significant differences were observed concerning the other sex hormone levels. However, in the 17 participants with preoperative TT levels less than 300 ng/dL, we found increases in TT levels (205 vs. 376 ng/dL, p < 0.05) and estradiol levels (24.9 vs. 33.1 pg/mL, p < 0.05) after MV. In this subgroup, the mean increase in testosterone was 125 ± 83 ng/dL compared to preoperative levels, whereas the median increase in estradiol was 4.6 (-1.0, 11) pg/mL. No other statistically significant differences were observed regarding preoperative and postoperative sex hormone levels. Seventy-six percent of the participants with preoperative TT levels less than 300 ng/dL achieved levels higher than 300 ng/dL postoperatively. Conclusions We demonstrated that microsurgical varicocelectomy increases total testosterone levels only in men with low baseline levels of this hormone. In this scenario, 76% of men achieved levels higher than 300 ng/dL postoperatively. We also found an increase in estradiol levels in these men. Moreover, luteinizing hormone increased after the procedure. However, the clinical relevance of such changes remains unclear. Disclosure No.
Title: (218) EFFECT OF MICROSURGICAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SEX HORMONES LEVELS
Description:
Abstract Introduction Varicocele is defined as abnormal dilation of the internal spermatic veins due to incompetent venous valves, leading to venous reflux.
This condition is found in 15% of all men, and its prevalence increases to 40% in men with primary infertility and to 80% in men with secondary infertility.
Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated that this condition might impair Leydig cell function, and that varicocele repair can improve testosterone production.
Objective To evaluate the effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy (MV) on serum sex hormone levels in infertile men with varicocele.
Methods We reviewed a database of infertile men with palpable varicocele who underwent MV performed by a single surgeon and identified men who had preoperative and postoperative serum sex hormone data available.
Total testosterone (TT), estradiol, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in real-time by a solid-phase chemiluminescent immunoassay, while free testosterone (FT) levels were calculated using the validated formula of Vermeulen.
The testosterone/estradiol ratio was also calculated.
Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the variables before and after MV.
Significance was set at p < 0.
05.
We performed a subanalysis including only participants with TT levels less than 300 ng/dL.
Results Overall, we included 132 participants.
When analyzing the entire cohort, there was a decrease in postoperative luteinizing hormone levels compared to baseline (4.
8 vs.
5.
2 mUI/mL, p < 0.
05), and no statistically significant differences were observed concerning the other sex hormone levels.
However, in the 17 participants with preoperative TT levels less than 300 ng/dL, we found increases in TT levels (205 vs.
376 ng/dL, p < 0.
05) and estradiol levels (24.
9 vs.
33.
1 pg/mL, p < 0.
05) after MV.
In this subgroup, the mean increase in testosterone was 125 ± 83 ng/dL compared to preoperative levels, whereas the median increase in estradiol was 4.
6 (-1.
0, 11) pg/mL.
No other statistically significant differences were observed regarding preoperative and postoperative sex hormone levels.
Seventy-six percent of the participants with preoperative TT levels less than 300 ng/dL achieved levels higher than 300 ng/dL postoperatively.
Conclusions We demonstrated that microsurgical varicocelectomy increases total testosterone levels only in men with low baseline levels of this hormone.
In this scenario, 76% of men achieved levels higher than 300 ng/dL postoperatively.
We also found an increase in estradiol levels in these men.
Moreover, luteinizing hormone increased after the procedure.
However, the clinical relevance of such changes remains unclear.
Disclosure No.

Related Results

P–078 Prognostic factors for male fertility recovery after microsurgical varicocelectomy
P–078 Prognostic factors for male fertility recovery after microsurgical varicocelectomy
Abstract Study question What clinical and laboratory parameters are reliable predictors of spontaneous pregnancy (SP) after micr...
MICROSURGICAL AND VARICOCELECTOMY COMPERSION WITH AND WITHOUT TESTICULAR DELIVERY FOR TREATMENT OF VARICOCELE: A RANDOMIZE CONTROL TRIAL
MICROSURGICAL AND VARICOCELECTOMY COMPERSION WITH AND WITHOUT TESTICULAR DELIVERY FOR TREATMENT OF VARICOCELE: A RANDOMIZE CONTROL TRIAL
Purpose: Varicocele is a common type of male genital disease and can occur in men of any age, especially young people. Clinically venous enlargement or varicocele are found in abou...
Outcomes of Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Azoospermic Men with Varicocele: A Prospective Analysis of 50 Cases
Outcomes of Microsurgical Varicocelectomy in Azoospermic Men with Varicocele: A Prospective Analysis of 50 Cases
Background: Varicocele is a common correctable cause of male infertility and has been associated with impaired spermatogenesis, including azoospermia. Microsurgical varicocelectomy...
Varicocelectomy versus antioxidants in infertile men with isolated teratozoospermia: A retrospective analysis
Varicocelectomy versus antioxidants in infertile men with isolated teratozoospermia: A retrospective analysis
Objective: To compare the outcome of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy versus oral antioxidants for the management of male infertility due to isolated teratozoospermia. Mate...
Does the Type of Infertility Affect Varicocelectomy Efficacy?
Does the Type of Infertility Affect Varicocelectomy Efficacy?
Abstract Background: The aim of the study was to compare varicocelectomy efficacy in men with primary (PI) and secondary infertility (SI). Materials and methods: Men suffer...
Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Open Inguinal and Subinguinal Varicocelectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Open Inguinal and Subinguinal Varicocelectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Background: Varicocele is the most common surgically correctable cause of infertility in men. The aim of this study was comparing the success rate and complication...

Back to Top