Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Factors Influencing Variability in Groundwater Monitoring Data Sets
View through CrossRef
“Random” variability in groundwater monitoring data sets reduces the ability to identify long‐term concentration trends. This, in turn, increases the time and cost required to evaluate the effectiveness of natural attenuation and other groundwater remedies. To better understand the factors influencing variability in groundwater monitoring results, we have analyzed three large groundwater monitoring data sets. For the three data sets, the long‐term trend in contaminant concentration in each well accounted for an average of 30% to 40% of the overall variation in contaminant concentration. Understanding the causes of the remaining variability would support the development of improved groundwater monitoring methods. All three data sets show large differences in the temporal monitoring records between individual wells (e.g., coefficient of variation for monitoring results from individual wells ranges from 0.08 to 4.6) indicating that well and aquifer factors are more important contributors to variability than sample collection and analysis factors. However, the depth to groundwater (
R
2
= 0.020) and distance between water level and screened interval (
R
2
= 0.049) accounted for only a portion of the differences in variability between wells and other aquifer characteristics evaluated and were not correlated with the observed variability in monitoring results. Unidentified factors were apparently much more important contributors to variability than these factors. The monitoring data sets exhibited two distinct timescales for variability: Time‐independent variability that was apparent even when wells were re‐sampled within a few days and a long‐term variability likely associated with the long‐term concentration trend. The observation of time‐independent variability suggests that frequent monitoring of contaminated monitoring wells serves primarily to characterize sources of variability unrelated to the long‐term trend of primary interest.
Title: Factors Influencing Variability in Groundwater Monitoring Data Sets
Description:
“Random” variability in groundwater monitoring data sets reduces the ability to identify long‐term concentration trends.
This, in turn, increases the time and cost required to evaluate the effectiveness of natural attenuation and other groundwater remedies.
To better understand the factors influencing variability in groundwater monitoring results, we have analyzed three large groundwater monitoring data sets.
For the three data sets, the long‐term trend in contaminant concentration in each well accounted for an average of 30% to 40% of the overall variation in contaminant concentration.
Understanding the causes of the remaining variability would support the development of improved groundwater monitoring methods.
All three data sets show large differences in the temporal monitoring records between individual wells (e.
g.
, coefficient of variation for monitoring results from individual wells ranges from 0.
08 to 4.
6) indicating that well and aquifer factors are more important contributors to variability than sample collection and analysis factors.
However, the depth to groundwater (
R
2
= 0.
020) and distance between water level and screened interval (
R
2
= 0.
049) accounted for only a portion of the differences in variability between wells and other aquifer characteristics evaluated and were not correlated with the observed variability in monitoring results.
Unidentified factors were apparently much more important contributors to variability than these factors.
The monitoring data sets exhibited two distinct timescales for variability: Time‐independent variability that was apparent even when wells were re‐sampled within a few days and a long‐term variability likely associated with the long‐term concentration trend.
The observation of time‐independent variability suggests that frequent monitoring of contaminated monitoring wells serves primarily to characterize sources of variability unrelated to the long‐term trend of primary interest.
Related Results
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Awareness concerning sustainable groundwater management is gaining traction and calls for adequate understanding of the complexities of natural and anthropogenic processes and how ...
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GROUNDWATER RECHARGE IN HO CHI MINH CITY AREA
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GROUNDWATER RECHARGE IN HO CHI MINH CITY AREA
Groundwater is very important for the development of Ho Chi Minh City since it provides 32% of water supply, however, the groundwater level is decreasing dramatically in recent yea...
Shallow Groundwater Dynamics in Urban Environments: The Crucial Role of Capillary Forces
Shallow Groundwater Dynamics in Urban Environments: The Crucial Role of Capillary Forces
In urban areas, a high groundwater table can cause problems such as groundwater flooding, unintended infiltration into sewer and drainage systems, and infrastructure damage. These ...
The Impact of Climate Change and Urbanization on Groundwater Levels: A System Dynamics Model Analysis
The Impact of Climate Change and Urbanization on Groundwater Levels: A System Dynamics Model Analysis
Climate change and population growth have placed increasing stress on groundwater resources. Effective management of groundwater resources is crucial for promoting sustainable deve...
Forecasting Net Groundwater Depletion in Well Irrigation Areas with Long Short-term Memory Networks
Forecasting Net Groundwater Depletion in Well Irrigation Areas with Long Short-term Memory Networks
<p>Due to the scarcity of available surface water, many irrigated areas in North China Plain (NCP) heavily rely on groundwater, which has resulted in groundwater over...
Hydrogeoethical questions related to urban groundwater management: the case of Kabul city, Afghanistan
Hydrogeoethical questions related to urban groundwater management: the case of Kabul city, Afghanistan
Groundwater resources are largely invisible and unknown to most people. Hence, unauthorized appropriation of groundwater is not obvious, and its impacts are less evident. It can be...
Current status and future challenges of fresh groundwater assessment in Georgia
Current status and future challenges of fresh groundwater assessment in Georgia
Groundwater assessment can be considered a base and effective management tool to protect groundwater resources. Fresh groundwater assessment is a multi-component system that is dif...
Indicator-based assessment of groundwater resources sustainability in South Korea
Indicator-based assessment of groundwater resources sustainability in South Korea
Groundwater level decline and quality deterioration is continuously observed nationwide in South Korea. Meanwhile, the demand for groundwater, which is relatively stable and clean ...

