Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Teaching Aristotle in Early Fourteenth-Century Paris. John of Jandun’s Commentaries on Aristotle

View through CrossRef
Abstract John of Jandun, known as the ‘prince of the Averroists’, was active as teacher of arts for more than ten years, as shown by a number of writings dating from 1307 to 1321. The first part of his life, as teacher and commentator at the arts faculty in Paris, is full of interest. In fact, we may consider him as one of the great arts masters of the beginning of the fourteenth century. John commented on the great majority of Aristotle’s works. Moreover, he wrote independent treatises and a big number of questions and sophismata (at least ten). In this article I will study the character and teaching methods of his commentaries, in order to understand the evolution from simple teacher to the famous and arrogant master he became rather quickly, thus, in order to see the person behind the texts. Limited to John of Jandun’s commentaries on Aristotle’s works on natural philosophy, the article is an exercise in intellectual history, studying the way in which a particular person, in a particular institutional and historical context, can give us not only an insight in this (in our case remarkable) individual, but also in the context in which he evolved.
Title: Teaching Aristotle in Early Fourteenth-Century Paris. John of Jandun’s Commentaries on Aristotle
Description:
Abstract John of Jandun, known as the ‘prince of the Averroists’, was active as teacher of arts for more than ten years, as shown by a number of writings dating from 1307 to 1321.
The first part of his life, as teacher and commentator at the arts faculty in Paris, is full of interest.
In fact, we may consider him as one of the great arts masters of the beginning of the fourteenth century.
John commented on the great majority of Aristotle’s works.
Moreover, he wrote independent treatises and a big number of questions and sophismata (at least ten).
In this article I will study the character and teaching methods of his commentaries, in order to understand the evolution from simple teacher to the famous and arrogant master he became rather quickly, thus, in order to see the person behind the texts.
Limited to John of Jandun’s commentaries on Aristotle’s works on natural philosophy, the article is an exercise in intellectual history, studying the way in which a particular person, in a particular institutional and historical context, can give us not only an insight in this (in our case remarkable) individual, but also in the context in which he evolved.

Related Results

Natural philosophy, medieval
Natural philosophy, medieval
Medieval Latin natural philosophy falls into two main periods, before the rise of the universities (mainly in the twelfth century, when works were produced in connection with arist...
Developing Residents as Teachers: Process and Content
Developing Residents as Teachers: Process and Content
These data characterize and illuminate an analysis of experiences about teaching during each year of a pediatric residency training program in a tertiary care center. The curriculu...
Ancient Commentators on Aristotle
Ancient Commentators on Aristotle
In the first century bce, the previously unknown lecture notes that we now know as Aristotle’s works were rediscovered, and from then until the end of antiquity they received close...
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
AbstractThis book breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the ...
La Universidad de París en el Tractatus de Laudibus Parisiis de Juan de Jandún.
La Universidad de París en el Tractatus de Laudibus Parisiis de Juan de Jandún.
Desde el origen de la Universidad de París en la segunda década del siglo XIII, los enfrentamientos entre los magistri artium y teológos, además de ser muchos, tuvieron fuertes con...
Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Abstract Among the three kinds of theoretical knowledge, Aristotle distinguishes between physics and metaphysics—what he calls Second and First Philosophy. Aristotle’s physics stud...
The Pragmatics of Amusement in Selected British Football Commentaries
The Pragmatics of Amusement in Selected British Football Commentaries
Sport in general and football in particular have become the most popular form of amusement nowadays throughout the special performance of the commentators who comment on the game. ...
Reconstructing the Fictional Character of Fourteenth Daughter Xin (Xin Shisi Niang) in the English Translation of Liaozhai Zhiyi
Reconstructing the Fictional Character of Fourteenth Daughter Xin (Xin Shisi Niang) in the English Translation of Liaozhai Zhiyi
Fourteenth Daughter Xin (Xin Shisi Niang) is one of the unusual tales in the anthology Liaozhai Zhiyi by Chinese novelist Pu Songling. The characterization of Fourteenth Daughter X...

Back to Top