Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Different administration routes of recombinant human endostatin combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy might lead to different efficacy and safety profile in unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer: Updated follow‐up results from two phase I

View through CrossRef
BackgroundThere are two main choices of administration route of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) available and the treatment options of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have changed over time. The aim of this study was to observe the long‐term efficacy and safety of different administration routes of Endostar combined with CCRT.MethodsPatients with unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from two phase II trials were included as two cohorts. Both were treated with Endostar combined with CCRT. Endostar was administrated by intravenous injection (7.5 mg/m2/day, seven days) in the IV arm and by continuous intravenous pumping (7.5 mg/m2/24 hours, 120 hours) in the CIV arm.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included in the IV arm and 67 patients in the CIV arm. The median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) in the IV arm and CIV arm were 9.9 months versus 15.4 months (HR = 0.751, 95% CI 0.487–1.160, P = 0.200), 24.0 months versus 38.5 months (HR = 0.746, 95% CI 0.473–1.178, P = 0.209), 32.3 months versus 27.1 months (HR = 1.193, 95% CI 0.673–2.115, P = 0.546), 20.1 months versus 49.7 months (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.351–1.036, P = 0.067). The one, three, five‐year PFS in the IV arm and CIV arm was 45.8% versus 52.9%, 18.3% versus 31.4%, and 18.3% versus 27.7% and the one, three, five‐year OS was 81.2% versus 82.1%, 31.1% versus 50.3%, and 31.1% versus 41%, respectively. Incidence of hematological adverse reactions were numerically lower in the CIV arm than the IV arm.ConclusionsEndostar delivered by CIV with CCRT may be a better option than IV in terms of potential survival and safety for unresectable stage III NSCLC.Key pointsSignificant findings of the study Endostar delivered by continuous intravenous pumping might achieve more favorable survival over intravenous injection and reduce adverse hematological reactions in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with Endostar combined with CCRT.What this study adds The administration route of recombinant human endostatin is also one key factor for survival and safety to consider when treating patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Title: Different administration routes of recombinant human endostatin combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy might lead to different efficacy and safety profile in unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer: Updated follow‐up results from two phase I
Description:
BackgroundThere are two main choices of administration route of recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) available and the treatment options of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have changed over time.
The aim of this study was to observe the long‐term efficacy and safety of different administration routes of Endostar combined with CCRT.
MethodsPatients with unresectable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from two phase II trials were included as two cohorts.
Both were treated with Endostar combined with CCRT.
Endostar was administrated by intravenous injection (7.
5 mg/m2/day, seven days) in the IV arm and by continuous intravenous pumping (7.
5 mg/m2/24 hours, 120 hours) in the CIV arm.
ResultsA total of 48 patients were included in the IV arm and 67 patients in the CIV arm.
The median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) in the IV arm and CIV arm were 9.
9 months versus 15.
4 months (HR = 0.
751, 95% CI 0.
487–1.
160, P = 0.
200), 24.
0 months versus 38.
5 months (HR = 0.
746, 95% CI 0.
473–1.
178, P = 0.
209), 32.
3 months versus 27.
1 months (HR = 1.
193, 95% CI 0.
673–2.
115, P = 0.
546), 20.
1 months versus 49.
7 months (HR = 0.
603, 95% CI 0.
351–1.
036, P = 0.
067).
The one, three, five‐year PFS in the IV arm and CIV arm was 45.
8% versus 52.
9%, 18.
3% versus 31.
4%, and 18.
3% versus 27.
7% and the one, three, five‐year OS was 81.
2% versus 82.
1%, 31.
1% versus 50.
3%, and 31.
1% versus 41%, respectively.
Incidence of hematological adverse reactions were numerically lower in the CIV arm than the IV arm.
ConclusionsEndostar delivered by CIV with CCRT may be a better option than IV in terms of potential survival and safety for unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Key pointsSignificant findings of the study Endostar delivered by continuous intravenous pumping might achieve more favorable survival over intravenous injection and reduce adverse hematological reactions in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with Endostar combined with CCRT.
What this study adds The administration route of recombinant human endostatin is also one key factor for survival and safety to consider when treating patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Related Results

Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Therapy of Hematogenous Melanoma Brain Metastases with Endostatin
Therapy of Hematogenous Melanoma Brain Metastases with Endostatin
Abstract Purpose: Cerebral metastases represent the most common type of brain tumors. This study investigated the effects of endogenous endostatin on hematogenous ce...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
Human tissues comprise trillions of cells that populate a complex space of molecular phenotypes and functions and that vary in abundance by 4–9 orders of magnitude. Relying solely ...
Biopsy of palliative lesions following radiotherapy
Biopsy of palliative lesions following radiotherapy
Objective: Definite radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy is often conducted for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, there is a potential concern regarding the mu...
Abstract 1345: Evidence for genetic mediation of lung cancer through hay fever.
Abstract 1345: Evidence for genetic mediation of lung cancer through hay fever.
Abstract Introduction: In the past decade, advances in genetics have led to the discovery of numerous lung cancer susceptibility variants. The majority of these vari...

Back to Top