Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Modern approaches to local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (literature review)

View through CrossRef
The potential oncological benefit of modern technological, laboratorial and imaging studies significantly improved disease-free survival rates in patients suffering from prostate cancer (PCa). Systematic reviews carried out in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) identify plenty of studies, especially dedicated to local treatment options. Unfortunately, young and fit patients with mPCa at diagnosis present unexpected resistance towards proposed treatment. Oncological outcomes demonstrate high rate of cancer-specific and overall mortality with precursory invasion of adjacent structures and impaired quality of life in patients. Current literature review was carried out using mainly PubMed and SciELO database to identify and analyze advances of local treatment of mPCa. The most relevant articles included studies performed from March 2005 to November 2020. According to the last brief reviews, main indication for providing primary treatment of PCa includes nonmetastatic PCa. Additionaly, it may be performed as palliative treatment for mPCa to minimize local invasion, prevent arising of new metastasis and provide better biological answer of chemotherapy and hormonal treatment. Recent data suggests that local treatment and overall survival turned out to be more effective in patients under 70 years. Thus, independent negative prognostic factors mentioned in patients with mPCa are age above 70 years, cT4 stage or high-grade disease, PSA і 20 ng/ml, and pelvic lymphadenopathies. While comparing patients who underwent local treatment with those one who did not, the presence of these 3 or more CSS and OS factors conditions remains the same. Metastasis degree and location number can also influence outcome. Furthermore, visceral metastases lead to worse prognosis. Exploring new treatment options for mPCa awoke interest in scientists in recent years. Radical prostatectomy and target radiation therapy remain the most effective in achieving local disease control and, thus, control of systemic disease. There is growing evidence supporting local treatment in cases of metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis in the context of a multimodal approach. However, its oncological effect requires prospective studies with well-defined patient selection criteria. Prospective multicentric studies might sustain the existing data and define the main indications for primary treatment in mPCa.
Dnipro State Medical University
Title: Modern approaches to local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (literature review)
Description:
The potential oncological benefit of modern technological, laboratorial and imaging studies significantly improved disease-free survival rates in patients suffering from prostate cancer (PCa).
Systematic reviews carried out in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) identify plenty of studies, especially dedicated to local treatment options.
Unfortunately, young and fit patients with mPCa at diagnosis present unexpected resistance towards proposed treatment.
Oncological outcomes demonstrate high rate of cancer-specific and overall mortality with precursory invasion of adjacent structures and impaired quality of life in patients.
Current literature review was carried out using mainly PubMed and SciELO database to identify and analyze advances of local treatment of mPCa.
The most relevant articles included studies performed from March 2005 to November 2020.
According to the last brief reviews, main indication for providing primary treatment of PCa includes nonmetastatic PCa.
Additionaly, it may be performed as palliative treatment for mPCa to minimize local invasion, prevent arising of new metastasis and provide better biological answer of chemotherapy and hormonal treatment.
Recent data suggests that local treatment and overall survival turned out to be more effective in patients under 70 years.
Thus, independent negative prognostic factors mentioned in patients with mPCa are age above 70 years, cT4 stage or high-grade disease, PSA і 20 ng/ml, and pelvic lymphadenopathies.
While comparing patients who underwent local treatment with those one who did not, the presence of these 3 or more CSS and OS factors conditions remains the same.
Metastasis degree and location number can also influence outcome.
Furthermore, visceral metastases lead to worse prognosis.
Exploring new treatment options for mPCa awoke interest in scientists in recent years.
Radical prostatectomy and target radiation therapy remain the most effective in achieving local disease control and, thus, control of systemic disease.
There is growing evidence supporting local treatment in cases of metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis in the context of a multimodal approach.
However, its oncological effect requires prospective studies with well-defined patient selection criteria.
Prospective multicentric studies might sustain the existing data and define the main indications for primary treatment in mPCa.

Related Results

Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy (after lung cancer) in men worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in men in Algeri...
Abstract 5758: Deletions of olfactomedin 4 gene is associated with progression of prostate cancer
Abstract 5758: Deletions of olfactomedin 4 gene is associated with progression of prostate cancer
Abstract The human olfactomedin 4 gene (OLFM4) encodes an olfactomedin-related glycoprotein, which our group first cloned and characterized in myeloid cells and mapp...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Abstract 1423: SSX-2 expression and function in metastatic prostate cancer
Abstract 1423: SSX-2 expression and function in metastatic prostate cancer
Abstract Background: The SSX family of proteins, whose function and aberrant expression in prostate cancer isn't fully understood, may lead to disease progression fr...
Abstract 1568: The role of CCL2 CCL17 CCL22-CCR4 axis in prostate cancer metastasis
Abstract 1568: The role of CCL2 CCL17 CCL22-CCR4 axis in prostate cancer metastasis
Abstract BACKGROUND: Multiple steps and factors are involved in prostate carcinogenesis and tumor progression. The early studies have found that tumor-associated mac...
Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
ImportanceAdvocates for removing the cancer label from grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer detected on biopsy primarily base their argument on the observation that when only GG1 is...
YAP1 and downstream gene alterations in metastatic breast cancer.
YAP1 and downstream gene alterations in metastatic breast cancer.
e13121 Background: Metastatic breast cancer remains a major clinical challenge, characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeuti...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...

Back to Top