Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The effect of assisted enteral feeding on treatment outcome in dogs with inflammatory protein-losing enteropathy

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The effect of assisted enteral feeding on treatment outcome in dogs with protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) is unknown. Objectives To determine if dogs with inflammatory PLE that had an enteral feeding tube placed had better outcome vs dogs with inflammatory PLE without a feeding tube. Animals Fifty-seven dogs with inflammatory PLE. Methods A retrospective study at a UK referral hospital identified dogs with inflammatory PLE using a standard diagnostic criterion. Positive outcome was defined as survival greater than 6 months or death unrelated to PLE and negative outcome as death related to PLE within 6 months of diagnosis. Several variables were assessed to identify factors for positive outcome using logistic regression. Results Thirty-five (61%) and 22 (39%) dogs had a positive and negative outcome at 6 months, respectively. Of the 21 dogs that had a feeding tube placed within 5 days of gastrointestinal biopsy, 16 (76%) had a positive outcome and 5 (24%) had a negative outcome. Dogs treated with dietary treatment alone (P = .002) and dogs with an enteral feeding tube (P = .006) were significantly associated with a positive outcome. When stratified by treatment, assisted enteral feeding was significantly associated with a positive outcome in dogs treated with concurrent immunosuppressive treatment (P = .006), but there was insufficient data to evaluate dogs treated with dietary treatment alone. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Assisted enteral feeding in dogs with inflammatory PLE could be associated with improved treatment outcome, especially in those receiving immunosuppressive treatment, and should be considered in the treatment plan of these dogs.
Title: The effect of assisted enteral feeding on treatment outcome in dogs with inflammatory protein-losing enteropathy
Description:
Abstract Background The effect of assisted enteral feeding on treatment outcome in dogs with protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) is unknown.
Objectives To determine if dogs with inflammatory PLE that had an enteral feeding tube placed had better outcome vs dogs with inflammatory PLE without a feeding tube.
Animals Fifty-seven dogs with inflammatory PLE.
Methods A retrospective study at a UK referral hospital identified dogs with inflammatory PLE using a standard diagnostic criterion.
Positive outcome was defined as survival greater than 6 months or death unrelated to PLE and negative outcome as death related to PLE within 6 months of diagnosis.
Several variables were assessed to identify factors for positive outcome using logistic regression.
Results Thirty-five (61%) and 22 (39%) dogs had a positive and negative outcome at 6 months, respectively.
Of the 21 dogs that had a feeding tube placed within 5 days of gastrointestinal biopsy, 16 (76%) had a positive outcome and 5 (24%) had a negative outcome.
Dogs treated with dietary treatment alone (P = .
002) and dogs with an enteral feeding tube (P = .
006) were significantly associated with a positive outcome.
When stratified by treatment, assisted enteral feeding was significantly associated with a positive outcome in dogs treated with concurrent immunosuppressive treatment (P = .
006), but there was insufficient data to evaluate dogs treated with dietary treatment alone.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance Assisted enteral feeding in dogs with inflammatory PLE could be associated with improved treatment outcome, especially in those receiving immunosuppressive treatment, and should be considered in the treatment plan of these dogs.

Related Results

FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
ABSTRACTBackground: Hospital enteral formula with lactose-free content is still rare, meanwhile lactose-free enteral food is needed, especially with patients who have lactose intol...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Routine practice after bowel anastomoses has been to keep patient nil per oral till the return of bowel sound with a belief that this will prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting...
Association between delivery methods for enteral nutrition and physical status among older adults
Association between delivery methods for enteral nutrition and physical status among older adults
Abstract Background The physical status of patients who received enteral nutrition is still unclear. We aimed to compare the physical functional status among older adult patients w...

Back to Top