Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Letter from the old Bolshevik M. S. Olminsky to the Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the RSFSR V.I.Lenin on the issue of ensuring the safety of the valuables of the Armory Chamber of the Moscow Kremlin (May 7, 1922)
View through CrossRef
In the autumn of 1921 — in the spring of 1922, the Soviet government initiated a large-scale confiscation campaign. The jewels brought to Moscow from all over the country were destined for subsequent sale on the foreign market. Seizures were made (among other things) from operating liturgical buildings and prayer rooms of various denominations, as well as from some museums. Employees of the Main Committee for Museum Affairs and the Protection of Ancient Art and Nature Monuments of the People’s Commissariat for Education of the RSFSR took part in the seizure procedure. Museum workers interpreted the normative documents in force at that time as the right of the museum community to fundamentally influence the course and scale of the confiscation process (up to the right of veto). Party and Soviet functionaries were convinced that among the museum workers there were many persons closely associated with church circles, counter-revolutionary seeking to disrupt the work of seizing church gold. On May 7, 1922, in the midst of a “conflict” between museum staff and state structures, the chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the RSFSR V.I.Lenin receives a letter from Olminsky, one of the oldest figures in the Russian revolutionary movement, about the need to prevent the possibility of theft of the values of the Armory Chamber of the Moscow Kremlin by museum workers. For the first time we publish 6 documents concerning the discussion. These documents were found in the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History among the materials of one of the “thematic folders” of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the RKP(b) — VKP(b) — CPSU: 21st “group of documents”. The archivalsources clarify the role played by the Glavmuseum (and its local branches) in saving the country’s cultural heritage during the large-scale confiscation measures of 1921–1922.
Title: Letter from the old Bolshevik M. S. Olminsky to the Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the RSFSR V.I.Lenin on the issue of ensuring the safety of the valuables of the Armory Chamber of the Moscow Kremlin (May 7, 1922)
Description:
In the autumn of 1921 — in the spring of 1922, the Soviet government initiated a large-scale confiscation campaign.
The jewels brought to Moscow from all over the country were destined for subsequent sale on the foreign market.
Seizures were made (among other things) from operating liturgical buildings and prayer rooms of various denominations, as well as from some museums.
Employees of the Main Committee for Museum Affairs and the Protection of Ancient Art and Nature Monuments of the People’s Commissariat for Education of the RSFSR took part in the seizure procedure.
Museum workers interpreted the normative documents in force at that time as the right of the museum community to fundamentally influence the course and scale of the confiscation process (up to the right of veto).
Party and Soviet functionaries were convinced that among the museum workers there were many persons closely associated with church circles, counter-revolutionary seeking to disrupt the work of seizing church gold.
On May 7, 1922, in the midst of a “conflict” between museum staff and state structures, the chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the RSFSR V.
I.
Lenin receives a letter from Olminsky, one of the oldest figures in the Russian revolutionary movement, about the need to prevent the possibility of theft of the values of the Armory Chamber of the Moscow Kremlin by museum workers.
For the first time we publish 6 documents concerning the discussion.
These documents were found in the Russian State Archive of Contemporary History among the materials of one of the “thematic folders” of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the RKP(b) — VKP(b) — CPSU: 21st “group of documents”.
The archivalsources clarify the role played by the Glavmuseum (and its local branches) in saving the country’s cultural heritage during the large-scale confiscation measures of 1921–1922.
Related Results
CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
NOTITLE. Chairman
Mokhov Igor
RAS academecian, Dr. Sci., Professor
...
Necropolises of the Moscow Kremlin: History and Stages of Field Archaeological Research.
Necropolises of the Moscow Kremlin: History and Stages of Field Archaeological Research.
The object of this study are the necropolises of the Moscow Kremlin, the subject of the study is the history of their study by field archaeological methods. The purpose of the stud...
Approaches of the USSR and the RSFSR to the Institutionalization of Ethnic Policy on the Example of the Creation of the Goskomnats of the USSR and the Goskomnats of the RSFSR in 1989-1991
Approaches of the USSR and the RSFSR to the Institutionalization of Ethnic Policy on the Example of the Creation of the Goskomnats of the USSR and the Goskomnats of the RSFSR in 1989-1991
The article deals with the problem of institutionalization of ethnic policy in the USSR and the RSFSR, namely, the process of creating state institutions for its implementation in ...
Lenin’s Memorization as a Hierotopic Project
Lenin’s Memorization as a Hierotopic Project
This article traces the implementation of the concept of ‘temple consciousness’ in hierotopic processes, including the construction of monuments and the organization of memorial si...
Can<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Pro<span style="letter-spacing: .05pt;">gre<span style="letter-spacing: .05pt;">ssive<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Supranuclear<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Palsy<span
Can<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Pro<span style="letter-spacing: .05pt;">gre<span style="letter-spacing: .05pt;">ssive<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Supranuclear<span style="letter-spacing: .1pt;"> Palsy<span
Introduction Neurodegenerative diseases like progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) present challenges concerning their diagnosis. Neuroimaging using magnetic resonance (MRI) may ad...
Vladimir Dmitrievich FEDOROV, doctor of medical Sciences, Professor, academician, Director of the Institute of surgery them. A.V. Vishnevsky (to 85-th anniversary from birthday)
Vladimir Dmitrievich FEDOROV, doctor of medical Sciences, Professor, academician, Director of the Institute of surgery them. A.V. Vishnevsky (to 85-th anniversary from birthday)
Vladimir Dmitrievich Fedorov was born on 21 March 1933 in Moscow. After finishing school he entered in the 2nd Moscow medical Institute named after N. And. Pirogov (1950-1956), whe...
GREKOV Ivan Ivanovich (1867-1934). The 150th of the birthday
GREKOV Ivan Ivanovich (1867-1934). The 150th of the birthday
Ivan Ivanovich Grekov (1867-1934) – an outstanding Russian surgeon, a talented organizer and teacher, doctor of medical science (1901), Professor (1915), honorary Chairman of the S...
A “Museum of Bad Taste”?: The Jewish Labour Bund and the Bolshevik Position Regarding the National Question, 1903-14
A “Museum of Bad Taste”?: The Jewish Labour Bund and the Bolshevik Position Regarding the National Question, 1903-14
This article discusses the debates on the national question between the Bolshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDRP), led by Vladimir Lenin, and the Jewi...

