Javascript must be enabled to continue!
PERSONALIZED EXPLAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved into an indispensable technology that assists humans in making better decisions through predictive analysis and personalized recommendations in numerous sectors. However, complex machine learning (ML) models become less transparent and may recommend incorrect decisions, which leads to a loss of confidence and trust. Consequently, explainability is considered a key requirement of AI-enabled systems. Recent studies focus on implementing explainable AI (XAI) techniques to improve the transparency and trustworthiness of ML models. However, analyzing the explainability requirements of different stakeholders, especially non-technical stakeholders for AI-enabled systems, remains challenging. It lacks a comprehensive and personalized requirements analysis process that investigates the risk impact of outcomes produced by ML models and analyzes diverse stakeholder needs for explanations. This research proposes a framework with a requirement analysis that includes four key stages: (1) domain analysis, (2) stakeholder analysis, (3) explainability analysis, and (4) translation and prioritization, to analyze the personalized explainability needs of four types of stakeholders (i.e., development team, subject matter experts, decision makers and affected users) for AI-enabled systems. As demonstrated by the case study, it is feasible to apply the proposed framework to analyze diverse stakeholders' needs and define personalized explainability requirements for AI-enabled systems effectively.
Title: PERSONALIZED EXPLAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS
Description:
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved into an indispensable technology that assists humans in making better decisions through predictive analysis and personalized recommendations in numerous sectors.
However, complex machine learning (ML) models become less transparent and may recommend incorrect decisions, which leads to a loss of confidence and trust.
Consequently, explainability is considered a key requirement of AI-enabled systems.
Recent studies focus on implementing explainable AI (XAI) techniques to improve the transparency and trustworthiness of ML models.
However, analyzing the explainability requirements of different stakeholders, especially non-technical stakeholders for AI-enabled systems, remains challenging.
It lacks a comprehensive and personalized requirements analysis process that investigates the risk impact of outcomes produced by ML models and analyzes diverse stakeholder needs for explanations.
This research proposes a framework with a requirement analysis that includes four key stages: (1) domain analysis, (2) stakeholder analysis, (3) explainability analysis, and (4) translation and prioritization, to analyze the personalized explainability needs of four types of stakeholders (i.
e.
, development team, subject matter experts, decision makers and affected users) for AI-enabled systems.
As demonstrated by the case study, it is feasible to apply the proposed framework to analyze diverse stakeholders' needs and define personalized explainability requirements for AI-enabled systems effectively.
Related Results
Explainability, Transparency, and Accountability in AI Systems
Explainability, Transparency, and Accountability in AI Systems
<p><span>Background</span><b><i><span>.</span></i></b><span> Explainability, transparency, and accountability have evolv...
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Hypertension poses a significant global burden due to low adherence to antihypertensive medications. Hypertension treatment aims to bring blood pressure within physiological ranges...
Towards trustworthy AI: An analysis of the relationship between explainability and trust in AI systems
Towards trustworthy AI: An analysis of the relationship between explainability and trust in AI systems
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integral to our lives, ensuring these systems are trustworthy and transparent is paramount. The concept of explainability has e...
Advancements and innovations in requirements elicitation: Developing a comprehensive conceptual model
Advancements and innovations in requirements elicitation: Developing a comprehensive conceptual model
Requirements elicitation is a crucial phase in the software development lifecycle, ensuring that stakeholders' needs are understood and translated into system specifications. Tradi...
EMBER-Based Static Malware Detection: A Critical Review of Accuracy, Explainability, and Temporal Robustness Trade-offs
EMBER-Based Static Malware Detection: A Critical Review of Accuracy, Explainability, and Temporal Robustness Trade-offs
Static analysis-based malware detection of Portable Executable (PE) files has evolved remarkably since the release of the EMBER dataset in 2018. Yet evaluation methodology and mode...
From Explainability to System Language: Why AI Accountability Requires a Formal Execution Vocabulary
From Explainability to System Language: Why AI Accountability Requires a Formal Execution Vocabulary
<div>
<p>Current approaches to AI accountability rely predominantly on explainability. By translating system behavior into human-interpretable narratives, explainabili...
A Logic Tensor Network-Based Neurosymbolic Framework for Explainable Diabetes Prediction
A Logic Tensor Network-Based Neurosymbolic Framework for Explainable Diabetes Prediction
Neurosymbolic AI is an emerging paradigm that combines neural network learning capabilities with the structured reasoning capacity of symbolic systems. Although machine learning ha...
Functional Requirements for Medical Data Integration in Knowledge Management Environments: A Systematic Literature Analysis (Preprint)
Functional Requirements for Medical Data Integration in Knowledge Management Environments: A Systematic Literature Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
In patient care, data are historically generated and stored in heterogeneous databases that are domain specific and are often non-interoperable o...

