Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An online method database for mapping and assessing ecosystem services

View through CrossRef
Since the foundation of the ecosystem services concept in the ninetieth of the last century (Costanza et al. 1998, Costanza et al. 1997, de Groot 1992), many methods to map and assess ecosystem services have been developed and applied to policy and business questions worldwide. While many flexible methods exist at different spatial scales and ecosystem types, Jax et al. (2018) express the difficulty in choosing and applying the correct method to the right topic of interest. To enable a selection of appropriate methods, Harrison et al. (2018) developed a decision tree approach. However, Dunford et al. (2018) argue that often not a single method but a combination of methods are required for appropriate decision-making in real world situations. Thus, applying the concept of ecosystem services in practice is challenging, especially at institutional level (Saarikoski et al. 2018). This hampers comparability, applicability and transferability of ecosystem services assessments and related mapping applications across scales and European regions. It also impedes a solid overview of existing methods suitable for use at different scales in different biomes and types of ecosystems. These challenges require a consistent knowledge capitalisation infrastructure, where information is synthesised in a publicly accessible portal to enable a consistent description of different ecosystem conditions and the services they provide. Going beyond the previously mentioned challenges requires a flexible methodology for assessing and mapping ecosystem services. The Horizon 2020 project ESMERALDA (Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking) developed this methodology and implemented it into the "MAES explorer"*5 and the "MAES Methods Explorer*1 (MME)". The MME complements previous developments from the EU projects OpenNESS*2 and OPERAs*3. In contrast to the OPPLA*4 case-study-finder with case study areas and accompanied study area booklets and descriptions, MME focuses on methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services and links those to selected literature and case studies. Additionally, MME provides a comprehensive and publicly searchable collection of peer-reviewed journal references and grey literature about mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe. This compilation is cross-related with the case study booklets produced by the ESMERALDA project and particularly methods, which are specifically used to assess and map particular ecosystem services within the case study area. Thus, searching for and filtering of particular case study areas, (related) literature references and/or methods is possible. Santos-Martin et al. (2018) provide the detailed description about the scientific procedure behind the MME tool described here.
Title: An online method database for mapping and assessing ecosystem services
Description:
Since the foundation of the ecosystem services concept in the ninetieth of the last century (Costanza et al.
1998, Costanza et al.
1997, de Groot 1992), many methods to map and assess ecosystem services have been developed and applied to policy and business questions worldwide.
While many flexible methods exist at different spatial scales and ecosystem types, Jax et al.
(2018) express the difficulty in choosing and applying the correct method to the right topic of interest.
To enable a selection of appropriate methods, Harrison et al.
(2018) developed a decision tree approach.
However, Dunford et al.
(2018) argue that often not a single method but a combination of methods are required for appropriate decision-making in real world situations.
Thus, applying the concept of ecosystem services in practice is challenging, especially at institutional level (Saarikoski et al.
2018).
This hampers comparability, applicability and transferability of ecosystem services assessments and related mapping applications across scales and European regions.
It also impedes a solid overview of existing methods suitable for use at different scales in different biomes and types of ecosystems.
These challenges require a consistent knowledge capitalisation infrastructure, where information is synthesised in a publicly accessible portal to enable a consistent description of different ecosystem conditions and the services they provide.
Going beyond the previously mentioned challenges requires a flexible methodology for assessing and mapping ecosystem services.
The Horizon 2020 project ESMERALDA (Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking) developed this methodology and implemented it into the "MAES explorer"*5 and the "MAES Methods Explorer*1 (MME)".
The MME complements previous developments from the EU projects OpenNESS*2 and OPERAs*3.
In contrast to the OPPLA*4 case-study-finder with case study areas and accompanied study area booklets and descriptions, MME focuses on methods for mapping and assessing ecosystem services and links those to selected literature and case studies.
Additionally, MME provides a comprehensive and publicly searchable collection of peer-reviewed journal references and grey literature about mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe.
This compilation is cross-related with the case study booklets produced by the ESMERALDA project and particularly methods, which are specifically used to assess and map particular ecosystem services within the case study area.
Thus, searching for and filtering of particular case study areas, (related) literature references and/or methods is possible.
Santos-Martin et al.
(2018) provide the detailed description about the scientific procedure behind the MME tool described here.

Related Results

Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Humans depend on the environment for their basic needs, such as food, fuel, minerals, water, air, etc. Burgeoning unplanned development activities to cater to the demands of the in...
Research Assessment on the Supply and Demand for Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case of Zhuxi County
Research Assessment on the Supply and Demand for Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case of Zhuxi County
A refined assessment of small-scale to medium-scale forest ecosystem services based on the unique geographical conditions of Zhuxi County provides a basis for decision-making to cr...
Valuation Methods in Ecosystem Services: A Meta-analysis
Valuation Methods in Ecosystem Services: A Meta-analysis
Abstract Ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from ecosystems, including provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services. The Meta-analysis of this...
Dynamics of ecosystem services along ecological network seascapes
Dynamics of ecosystem services along ecological network seascapes
Human societies depend on services provided by ecosystems, from local needs as clean water and pest control to global services like ozone layer and the ocean biological pump. Ecosy...
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
The purpose of the article is to develop scientific approaches and identify key features of the assessment of ecosystem assets of territorial communities. The article examine...
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
Comparison of LA and PVC mapping using OCTARAY and OPTRELL catheters
AbstractBackgroundMultielectrode mapping catheters, such as the OCTARAY and OPTRELL, are essential in creating myocardial electroanatomical mapping in arrhythmias. The OCTARAY is a...
High Expression of AMIGO2 Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer
High Expression of AMIGO2 Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer
Abstract Background.The AMIGO2 extracellular domain has a leucine - rich repetitive domain (LRR) and encodes a type 1 transmembrane protein , and is a member of the AMIGO g...

Back to Top