Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

RISK HORIZON AND REBALANCING HORIZON IN PORTFOLIO RISK MEASUREMENT

View through CrossRef
This paper analyzes portfolio risk and volatility in the presence of constraints on portfolio rebalancing frequency. This investigation is motivated by the incremental risk charge (IRC) introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. In contrast to the standard market risk measure based on a 10‐day value‐at‐risk calculated at 99% confidence, the IRC considers more extreme losses and is measured over a 1‐year horizon. More importantly, whereas 10‐day VaR is ordinarily calculated with a portfolio’s holdings held fixed, the IRC assumes a portfolio is managed dynamically to a target level of risk, with constraints on rebalancing frequency. The IRC uses discrete rebalancing intervals (e.g., monthly or quarterly) as a rough measure of potential illiquidity in underlying assets. We analyze the effect of these rebalancing intervals on the portfolio’s profit and loss distribution over a risk‐measurement horizon. We derive limiting results, as the rebalancing frequency increases, for the difference between discretely and continuously rebalanced portfolios; we use these to approximate the loss distribution for the discretely rebalanced portfolio relative to the continuously rebalanced portfolio. Our analysis leads to explicit measures of the impact of discrete rebalancing under a simple model of asset dynamics.
Title: RISK HORIZON AND REBALANCING HORIZON IN PORTFOLIO RISK MEASUREMENT
Description:
This paper analyzes portfolio risk and volatility in the presence of constraints on portfolio rebalancing frequency.
This investigation is motivated by the incremental risk charge (IRC) introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
In contrast to the standard market risk measure based on a 10‐day value‐at‐risk calculated at 99% confidence, the IRC considers more extreme losses and is measured over a 1‐year horizon.
More importantly, whereas 10‐day VaR is ordinarily calculated with a portfolio’s holdings held fixed, the IRC assumes a portfolio is managed dynamically to a target level of risk, with constraints on rebalancing frequency.
The IRC uses discrete rebalancing intervals (e.
g.
, monthly or quarterly) as a rough measure of potential illiquidity in underlying assets.
We analyze the effect of these rebalancing intervals on the portfolio’s profit and loss distribution over a risk‐measurement horizon.
We derive limiting results, as the rebalancing frequency increases, for the difference between discretely and continuously rebalanced portfolios; we use these to approximate the loss distribution for the discretely rebalanced portfolio relative to the continuously rebalanced portfolio.
Our analysis leads to explicit measures of the impact of discrete rebalancing under a simple model of asset dynamics.

Related Results

Optimizing Portfolio Management using Mean-Variance Optimization in Python
Optimizing Portfolio Management using Mean-Variance Optimization in Python
Portfolio management refers to the process of managing a collection of investments, known as a portfolio, intending to achieve optimal risk-adjusted returns. Portfolio management i...
Analysis of fixed and biased asset allocation rebalancing strategies
Analysis of fixed and biased asset allocation rebalancing strategies
Purpose– Over the years a number of tactical, dynamic and strategic approaches for asset allocation have been developed to improve the objectivity of portfolio management. One of t...
APPROACH SELECTION METHOD FOR PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATION
APPROACH SELECTION METHOD FOR PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATION
Project portfolio management has evolved in recent decades from an empirical field to a field with advanced management technologies, including the active use of information technol...
Rebalancing for Long-Term Investors: Why it Pays to Do Less
Rebalancing for Long-Term Investors: Why it Pays to Do Less
In this study we show that the rebalancing frequency of a multi-asset portfolio has only limited impact on the utility of a long-term passive investor. Although continuous rebalanc...
An Empirical Investigation of Portfolios with Little Idiosyncratic Risk
An Empirical Investigation of Portfolios with Little Idiosyncratic Risk
The objective of this study is to answer the following research question: How large is a diversified portfolio? Although previous work is abundant, very little progress has been ma...
The impact of the US Rebalancing Policy toward Asia Pacific on International Relations in the region
The impact of the US Rebalancing Policy toward Asia Pacific on International Relations in the region
The importance of Asia-Pacific region in United States (US) foreign policy increased in recent years. The US paid special attention to the region during the Obama era declaring the...
Portfolio Optimisation and Screening in Low Funding Era
Portfolio Optimisation and Screening in Low Funding Era
Abstract Portfolio optimisation is the process of choosing the proportions of various assets to be held in a portfolio, in such a way as to make the best use of the ...

Back to Top