Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
View through CrossRef
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant global health burden, with elevated intracranial pressure as a major cause of mortality and disability. The timing of decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI is controversial, with limited evidence on whether ultra-early intervention improves survival or neurological outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare survival rates, functional outcomes, and complications between ultra-early (<4 hours) and later decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe TBI, and to identify prognostic factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neurosurgical center, including 127 adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8) undergoing decompressive craniectomy between January 2021 and December 2023. Inclusion required age ≥18 years and blunt head trauma; exclusions were hypotension, hypoxia, penetrating injury, whole brain ischemia, or non-survivable comorbidities. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, radiological findings (Marshall CT classification), timing of surgery, and outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) were extracted. Statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.0 with t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Results: Of 127 patients (mean age 49.7 years, 76.4% male), 60 underwent ultra-early surgery. Overall mortality was 68.5%. Favorable outcome rates did not differ significantly between ultra-early and later groups (3.3% vs. 6.0%, p=0.678). Independent predictors of mortality included age >50 (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.52–6.91, p=0.002), GCS ≤5 (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.12–10.6, p<0.001), and Marshall Class 4 CT (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07–4.48, p=0.031), but not surgical timing. Conclusion: Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy does not significantly improve survival or functional outcomes over later intervention in severe TBI. Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific prognostic factors, emphasizing comprehensive assessment for optimal management and resource allocation in human healthcare.
Title: Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
Description:
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant global health burden, with elevated intracranial pressure as a major cause of mortality and disability.
The timing of decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI is controversial, with limited evidence on whether ultra-early intervention improves survival or neurological outcomes.
Objective: This study aimed to compare survival rates, functional outcomes, and complications between ultra-early (<4 hours) and later decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe TBI, and to identify prognostic factors influencing these outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neurosurgical center, including 127 adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8) undergoing decompressive craniectomy between January 2021 and December 2023.
Inclusion required age ≥18 years and blunt head trauma; exclusions were hypotension, hypoxia, penetrating injury, whole brain ischemia, or non-survivable comorbidities.
Data on demographics, injury characteristics, radiological findings (Marshall CT classification), timing of surgery, and outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) were extracted.
Statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.
0 with t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression.
Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Results: Of 127 patients (mean age 49.
7 years, 76.
4% male), 60 underwent ultra-early surgery.
Overall mortality was 68.
5%.
Favorable outcome rates did not differ significantly between ultra-early and later groups (3.
3% vs.
6.
0%, p=0.
678).
Independent predictors of mortality included age >50 (OR 3.
24, 95% CI 1.
52–6.
91, p=0.
002), GCS ≤5 (OR 4.
75, 95% CI 2.
12–10.
6, p<0.
001), and Marshall Class 4 CT (OR 2.
19, 95% CI 1.
07–4.
48, p=0.
031), but not surgical timing.
Conclusion: Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy does not significantly improve survival or functional outcomes over later intervention in severe TBI.
Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific prognostic factors, emphasizing comprehensive assessment for optimal management and resource allocation in human healthcare.
Related Results
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study in comparing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy in patients with acute subdural hematoma
A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study in comparing decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy in patients with acute subdural hematoma
Abstract
There are two controversial surgery methods which are traditionally used: craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the eff...
Brain volume abnormalities and clinical outcomes following paediatric traumatic brain injury
Brain volume abnormalities and clinical outcomes following paediatric traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Long-term outcomes are difficult to predict after paediatric traumatic brain injury. The presence or absence of focal brain injuries often do not explain co...
Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcomes and Predictive Factors at Ethiopian Tertiary Centers
Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcomes and Predictive Factors at Ethiopian Tertiary Centers
Abstract
Background
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is commonly performed to control refractory intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This s...
Outcome of traumatic brain injury and its associated factors among pediatrics patients treated in Amhara national regional state comprehensive specialized hospitals, Ethiopia 2022.
Outcome of traumatic brain injury and its associated factors among pediatrics patients treated in Amhara national regional state comprehensive specialized hospitals, Ethiopia 2022.
Background Traumatic brain injury in pediatrics is one of the commonest causes of morbidity, disability and mortality worldwide. In low- and middle-income countries Study showed th...
Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy
Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the major causes of death in younger age groups. In Umea, Sweden, an intracranial pressure (ICP) targeted therapy protocol, the Lund c...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...

