Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Partisanship and Economic Cooperation: Does Political Ideology Matter?
View through CrossRef
Does the partisanship of governing coalitions matter in determining patterns of economic cooperation between countries? A vast political economy literature suggests that differences in the partisanship of a government explains a broad array of domestic public policies. However, the topic is insufficiently addressed by international relations scholars and mixed results abound. In this paper, we propose to evaluate the relationship between government partisanship, based on ideological measures for heads of governments, and economic cooperation between countries, observing their behavior concerning Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). When analyzing BITs signed between 1990 and 2015 between 164 countries, we found evidence that a government's partisanship does not explain the probability of signing such agreements. Nevertheless, when observing the phenomena in a dyadic framework and conditioning on the partner's partisanship, the results demonstrate that governments who share similar ideological views cooperate more, or at least are more likely to sign BITs with each other. Additionally, the ideological alignment hypothesis seems to be stronger between the governments of developing countries and countries with left-wing governments. This study therefore makes an important empirical contribution to the literature by stressing the role played by ideology in international cooperation and unveiling competing explanations for BIT formation.
Title: Partisanship and Economic Cooperation: Does Political Ideology Matter?
Description:
Does the partisanship of governing coalitions matter in determining patterns of economic cooperation between countries? A vast political economy literature suggests that differences in the partisanship of a government explains a broad array of domestic public policies.
However, the topic is insufficiently addressed by international relations scholars and mixed results abound.
In this paper, we propose to evaluate the relationship between government partisanship, based on ideological measures for heads of governments, and economic cooperation between countries, observing their behavior concerning Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs).
When analyzing BITs signed between 1990 and 2015 between 164 countries, we found evidence that a government's partisanship does not explain the probability of signing such agreements.
Nevertheless, when observing the phenomena in a dyadic framework and conditioning on the partner's partisanship, the results demonstrate that governments who share similar ideological views cooperate more, or at least are more likely to sign BITs with each other.
Additionally, the ideological alignment hypothesis seems to be stronger between the governments of developing countries and countries with left-wing governments.
This study therefore makes an important empirical contribution to the literature by stressing the role played by ideology in international cooperation and unveiling competing explanations for BIT formation.
Related Results
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Partisanship in Crisis: Public Response to Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia
Partisanship in Crisis: Public Response to Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia
Given the fact that in a context of crises, people are concerned with their safety, among other things, partisan response toward policies and public leaders is an intriguing topic....
Evolution by National Election? Partisanship, Voting Behavior, and Sentiments toward Marginalized Groups
Evolution by National Election? Partisanship, Voting Behavior, and Sentiments toward Marginalized Groups
Given partisanship’s powerful role in the U.S., a wealth of research has sought to identify its determinants. Toward this end, scholars have long highlighted (1) social identities ...
Evolution by National Election? Partisanship, Voting Behavior, and Sentiments toward Marginalized Groups
Evolution by National Election? Partisanship, Voting Behavior, and Sentiments toward Marginalized Groups
Given partisanship’s powerful role in the U.S., a wealth of research has sought to identify its determinants. Toward this end, scholars have long highlighted (1) social identities ...
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Delio Cantimori (1904-1966) was one of the most important Italian historians of the twentieth century. His studies on sixteenth-century religious history, on Italian 'Jacobinism' a...
The Effective Ideology of Benjamin Tammuz’s Works
The Effective Ideology of Benjamin Tammuz’s Works
Benjamin Tammuz is one of the pioneers of Canaan ideology in Israel. He has been chosen due to the huge number of his literary works which tackle the issues of the Canaan ideology ...
IDEOLOGI BAHASA POLITIK SOEKARNO: SARANA KETAHANAN, KEAMANAN, DAN PERDAMAIAN INDONESIA
IDEOLOGI BAHASA POLITIK SOEKARNO: SARANA KETAHANAN, KEAMANAN, DAN PERDAMAIAN INDONESIA
The current study aims at: (1) to explore the ideology conceived in Soekarno’s political language as one of the nation founding fathers and the proclaimer of Indonesia independence...
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Introduction. This article substantiates the possibility of semiological analysis in relation to ideology on the basis of the semiological theory of R. Barthes. The subject of the ...

