Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Although length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is associated with worse patient and system level outcomes, the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence for the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS.
Methods
A comprehensive database search was conducted using terms related to LOS and CRS. Studies were included if they reported the effect of surgeon or hospital factors on LOS after elective CRS. The evidence for the effect of each surgeon and hospital factor on LOS was synthesized using vote counting by direction of effect, taking risk of bias into consideration.
Results
A total of 13 946 unique titles and abstracts were screened, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective and assessed a total of eight factors. Surgeon factors such as increasing surgeon volume, colorectal surgical specialty, and progression along a learning curve were significantly associated with decreased LOS (effect seen in 87.5 per cent, 100 per cent, and 93.3 per cent of studies respectively). In contrast, hospital factors such as hospital volume and teaching hospital status were not significantly associated with LOS.
Conclusion
Provider-related factors were found to be significantly associated with LOS after elective CRS. In particular, surgeon-related factors related to experience specifically impacted LOS, whereas hospital-related factors did not. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these relationships may allow for tailoring of interventions to reduce LOS.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review
Description:
Abstract
Background
Although length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is associated with worse patient and system level outcomes, the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS has not been well investigated.
The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence for the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS.
Methods
A comprehensive database search was conducted using terms related to LOS and CRS.
Studies were included if they reported the effect of surgeon or hospital factors on LOS after elective CRS.
The evidence for the effect of each surgeon and hospital factor on LOS was synthesized using vote counting by direction of effect, taking risk of bias into consideration.
Results
A total of 13 946 unique titles and abstracts were screened, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria.
All studies were retrospective and assessed a total of eight factors.
Surgeon factors such as increasing surgeon volume, colorectal surgical specialty, and progression along a learning curve were significantly associated with decreased LOS (effect seen in 87.
5 per cent, 100 per cent, and 93.
3 per cent of studies respectively).
In contrast, hospital factors such as hospital volume and teaching hospital status were not significantly associated with LOS.
Conclusion
Provider-related factors were found to be significantly associated with LOS after elective CRS.
In particular, surgeon-related factors related to experience specifically impacted LOS, whereas hospital-related factors did not.
Understanding the mechanisms underlying these relationships may allow for tailoring of interventions to reduce LOS.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract
Introduction: Current study found that about one-third of the incidence of colorectal cancer have genetic related. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract:
Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia
Background: Entero...
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
<p dir="ltr">Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and around 8000 persons in Sweden get the diagnosis each year. One in five will have metastases a...
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
<p dir="ltr">Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and around 8000 persons in Sweden get the diagnosis each year. One in five will have metastases a...
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
Metastatic colorectal cancer from an epidemiological and immunological perspective
<p dir="ltr">Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and around 8000 persons in Sweden get the diagnosis each year. One in five will have metastases a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

