Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Negation

View through CrossRef
The paper is concerned with negation in artificial and natural languages. "Negation" is an ambiguous word. It can mean three different things: An operation(negating), an operator (a sign of negation), the result of an operation. The threethings, however, are intimately linked. An operation such as negation, is realizedthrough an operator of negation, i.e. consists in adding a symbol of negation to an entity to obtain an entity of the same type; and which operation it is dependson what it applies to and on what results from its application. I argue that negation is not an operation on linguistic acts but rather anoperation on the objects of linguistic acts, namely sentences. And I assume that the negation of a sentence is a sentence that contradicts it. If so, the negation of a sentence may be obtained, in case the sentence is molecular, by applying the operation of negation not to the sentence itself but to a constituent sentence. To put it in a succinct and paradoxically sounding way we could say that in order to negate a sentence it is sufficient but not necessary to negate it. However that negation applies to sentences is true only for artificial languages, in which the sign of negation is a monadic sentential connective. In natural language, negation applies to expressions other than sentences, namely word sand non-sentential phrases. Still words and not sentential phrases are interesting and valuable only as ultimate or immediate constituents of sentences, as a means of saying (something that can be true or false) and the concern with negation is ultimately the concern with the negation of sentences. So the problem is what sub-sentential and non sentential expressions negation should apply to in order to obtain the negation of the containing sentence. The standard answer is that the negation of a natural language sentence is equivalent to the negation of its predicate. Yet, I argue, predicate negation is necessary but not sufficient, due to the existence of molecular sentences. Finally I notice that if to apply negation to an artificial sentence is to put the negation sign in front of it, to negate the predicate of a natural language sentencemay or may not be to put the negation sign in front of it.
Title: Negation
Description:
The paper is concerned with negation in artificial and natural languages.
"Negation" is an ambiguous word.
It can mean three different things: An operation(negating), an operator (a sign of negation), the result of an operation.
The threethings, however, are intimately linked.
An operation such as negation, is realizedthrough an operator of negation, i.
e.
consists in adding a symbol of negation to an entity to obtain an entity of the same type; and which operation it is dependson what it applies to and on what results from its application.
I argue that negation is not an operation on linguistic acts but rather anoperation on the objects of linguistic acts, namely sentences.
And I assume that the negation of a sentence is a sentence that contradicts it.
If so, the negation of a sentence may be obtained, in case the sentence is molecular, by applying the operation of negation not to the sentence itself but to a constituent sentence.
To put it in a succinct and paradoxically sounding way we could say that in order to negate a sentence it is sufficient but not necessary to negate it.
However that negation applies to sentences is true only for artificial languages, in which the sign of negation is a monadic sentential connective.
In natural language, negation applies to expressions other than sentences, namely word sand non-sentential phrases.
Still words and not sentential phrases are interesting and valuable only as ultimate or immediate constituents of sentences, as a means of saying (something that can be true or false) and the concern with negation is ultimately the concern with the negation of sentences.
So the problem is what sub-sentential and non sentential expressions negation should apply to in order to obtain the negation of the containing sentence.
The standard answer is that the negation of a natural language sentence is equivalent to the negation of its predicate.
Yet, I argue, predicate negation is necessary but not sufficient, due to the existence of molecular sentences.
Finally I notice that if to apply negation to an artificial sentence is to put the negation sign in front of it, to negate the predicate of a natural language sentencemay or may not be to put the negation sign in front of it.

Related Results

Pengaruh Teknik Penanganan Negasi Dalam Analisis Sentimen
Pengaruh Teknik Penanganan Negasi Dalam Analisis Sentimen
“Garbage in, garbage out” merupakan sebuah ungkapan klasik dalam data science yang menyatakan bahwa kualitas keluaran suatu sistem bergantung pada kualitas data yang dimasukkan. Da...
Pengaruh Teknik Penanganan Negasi Dalam Analisis Sentimen
Pengaruh Teknik Penanganan Negasi Dalam Analisis Sentimen
“Garbage in, garbage out” merupakan sebuah ungkapan klasik dalam data science yang menyatakan bahwa kualitas keluaran suatu sistem bergantung pada kualitas data yang dimasukkan. Da...
Negation in English and Yala Languages
Negation in English and Yala Languages
Negation is a denial, or a way of expressing a rejection of a positive proposition. It is a universal feature of human language in the sense that every language has a way of expres...
A corpus-based study of a Chinese-speaking child’s acquisition of English transferred negation
A corpus-based study of a Chinese-speaking child’s acquisition of English transferred negation
AbstractNative speakers of English have a strong preference for transferred negation as opposed to non-transferred negation. The present study aims to examine whether young Chinese...
Expletive negation in exclamatives – Evidence from Hungarian
Expletive negation in exclamatives – Evidence from Hungarian
Abstract This paper examines expletive negation in root clauses (surprise negation sentences and wh-exclamatives) in Hungarian. We argue that Hungarian has three distin...
Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse
Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse
AbstractModality and negation, as two important linguistic features used to realise subjectivity, have been investigated within various disciplines, such as logic, linguistics and ...
Negation, polarity and answers to negative polar questions in Romance : the case of Gallo
Negation, polarity and answers to negative polar questions in Romance : the case of Gallo
Négation, Polarité, Réponses à des Questions Polaires Négatives dans les langues Romanes : le Cas du Gallo Cette thèse cherche à fournir de nouvelles perspectives s...
Negation in Sakhalin Ainu: History and Typology
Negation in Sakhalin Ainu: History and Typology
This paper investigates negation in Sakhalin Ainu by focusing on the morphosyntax, semantics, and historical development of the negative proclitic ham=, which is employed for stand...

Back to Top