Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer: A Bibliometric Study and Clinical Trial Analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer (BC) remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women globally. Although early-stage BC typically presents with curative possibilities, advanced-stage disease, especially when complicated by metastatic involvement, is significantly limited in terms of efficacious therapeutic interventions, thereby establishing it as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) epitomize a groundbreaking class of anti-neoplastic agents characterized by elevated specificity and targeting precision. Originating in theoretical frameworks of the 1960s, ADCs achieved Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the year 2000 subsequent to exhaustive empirical scrutiny. These agents have been pivotal in reshaping the therapeutic approach to breast cancer, especially those subtypes with overexpression of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2). Comprising monoclonal antibodies, cytotoxic payloads, and conjugative linkers, ADCs function by specifically targeting antigens on cancer cells, thereby facilitating the intracellular delivery of the toxic payload. Current ADC modalities in BC treatment include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy, among others. The present investigation endeavors to synthesize existing primary research outcomes through rigorous bibliometric and data analytical approaches, thereby elucidating the current epistemological landscape, delineating research foci, and identifying potential avenues for future innovation.
Methods
For bibliometric analysis, a comprehensive data set comprising 2,181 entries pertinent to ADCs in breast cancer was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) spanning the years 1999 to 2023. This data was further filtered from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded). Analysis software tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed for multifaceted analyses encompassing economic indices, geographical research dissemination, journal co-citation metrics, authorial contributions, citation evaluations, and burst analytics. In the dimension of clinical trials, we interrogated databases including ClinicalTrials.gov (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://trialsearch.who.int). A total of 239 clinical trials were initially sourced, among which, 175 were from ClinicalTrials.gov and 64 from ICTRP. After repetitive and correlation-based screening, 119 trials specifically addressing ADC therapeutic strategies in breast cancer were included. Analytical algorithms were executed using Microsoft-based software to evaluate treatment paradigms, emergent research themes, and progress trajectories.
Results
Our investigations signify a burgeoning research milieu in ADCs, with consistent advancements in scientific achievements. The analysis revealed that variables such as economic stratification of nations, healthcare investment paradigms, and disease incidence rates serve as significant determinants in shaping research output. Geographically, the United States emerged as the predominant contributor to the research corpus (36.56%), closely followed by China (21.33%). The underpinning of research accomplishments was found to be significantly bolstered by advancements in molecular biology, immunology, and genetic research. Moreover, the advent of nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic modalities has contributed saliently to the diagnostic and therapeutic management of breast cancer.
Conclusion
Our study encapsulates a holistic view of the ADC research landscape through rigorous bibliometric and clinical trial evaluations. At present, the ADC arena has witnessed the successful development and FDA approval of 14 distinct agents, substantially improving the clinical outcomes for a broad spectrum of oncological patients. Future research imperatives may include the exploration of ADCs targeting mutated oncoproteins, dual-specificity ADCs, combination payload strategies, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs), and non-internalizing ADC modalities. With sustained academic and clinical focus, the ADC domain is poised for transformative advancements in targeted therapeutics across a variety of malignancies.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer: A Bibliometric Study and Clinical Trial Analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
Breast cancer (BC) remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women globally.
Although early-stage BC typically presents with curative possibilities, advanced-stage disease, especially when complicated by metastatic involvement, is significantly limited in terms of efficacious therapeutic interventions, thereby establishing it as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women.
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) epitomize a groundbreaking class of anti-neoplastic agents characterized by elevated specificity and targeting precision.
Originating in theoretical frameworks of the 1960s, ADCs achieved Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the year 2000 subsequent to exhaustive empirical scrutiny.
These agents have been pivotal in reshaping the therapeutic approach to breast cancer, especially those subtypes with overexpression of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2).
Comprising monoclonal antibodies, cytotoxic payloads, and conjugative linkers, ADCs function by specifically targeting antigens on cancer cells, thereby facilitating the intracellular delivery of the toxic payload.
Current ADC modalities in BC treatment include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy, among others.
The present investigation endeavors to synthesize existing primary research outcomes through rigorous bibliometric and data analytical approaches, thereby elucidating the current epistemological landscape, delineating research foci, and identifying potential avenues for future innovation.
Methods
For bibliometric analysis, a comprehensive data set comprising 2,181 entries pertinent to ADCs in breast cancer was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) spanning the years 1999 to 2023.
This data was further filtered from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded).
Analysis software tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer were employed for multifaceted analyses encompassing economic indices, geographical research dissemination, journal co-citation metrics, authorial contributions, citation evaluations, and burst analytics.
In the dimension of clinical trials, we interrogated databases including ClinicalTrials.
gov (https://www.
clinicaltrials.
gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://trialsearch.
who.
int).
A total of 239 clinical trials were initially sourced, among which, 175 were from ClinicalTrials.
gov and 64 from ICTRP.
After repetitive and correlation-based screening, 119 trials specifically addressing ADC therapeutic strategies in breast cancer were included.
Analytical algorithms were executed using Microsoft-based software to evaluate treatment paradigms, emergent research themes, and progress trajectories.
Results
Our investigations signify a burgeoning research milieu in ADCs, with consistent advancements in scientific achievements.
The analysis revealed that variables such as economic stratification of nations, healthcare investment paradigms, and disease incidence rates serve as significant determinants in shaping research output.
Geographically, the United States emerged as the predominant contributor to the research corpus (36.
56%), closely followed by China (21.
33%).
The underpinning of research accomplishments was found to be significantly bolstered by advancements in molecular biology, immunology, and genetic research.
Moreover, the advent of nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic modalities has contributed saliently to the diagnostic and therapeutic management of breast cancer.
Conclusion
Our study encapsulates a holistic view of the ADC research landscape through rigorous bibliometric and clinical trial evaluations.
At present, the ADC arena has witnessed the successful development and FDA approval of 14 distinct agents, substantially improving the clinical outcomes for a broad spectrum of oncological patients.
Future research imperatives may include the exploration of ADCs targeting mutated oncoproteins, dual-specificity ADCs, combination payload strategies, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs), and non-internalizing ADC modalities.
With sustained academic and clinical focus, the ADC domain is poised for transformative advancements in targeted therapeutics across a variety of malignancies.
Related Results
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship rema...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Sex Differences in Breast Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy and Combination Treatments
Sex Differences in Breast Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy and Combination Treatments
Background: Sex differences in breast cancer are critical determinants of tumor biology, treatment responses, and clinical outcomes. Despite breast cancer’s predominance in women, ...
PO-285 A review of effects of exercise on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors
PO-285 A review of effects of exercise on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors
Objective Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women.The number of women diagnosed with breast cancer each year is also increasing.It is also the leading cau...

