Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population

View through CrossRef
AbstractTo analyze the morphology of paired fibula and mandible aiming to choose optimal fibular segments for mandibular reconstruction in a Chinses population. A total of 118 cases of paired mandible and fibula was collected. All patients were received preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans for mandibular evaluation and CT-angiographical (CTA) examination of the bilateral lower legs, respectively. The cross-sectional morphological differences between proximal (Side P), middle (Side M) and distal (Side D) segments of fibula and anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible were compared. The most frequent cross-sectional shape at Side D, Side M and Side P portion of fibula was circular (75.4%), triangular (67.8%) and circular (49.2%), respectively. In anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible, the most of the cross-section was s-shape (90.82%), straight (83.64%) and oblique (91.89%), respectively. The height and width of upper one third (W1) at Side M were significantly larger than those of Side D and Side P (p < 0.0001). There was significantly difference of width of lower one third (W2) among three groups (p < 0.0001). As for the height and widths of mandible, there was significant difference among anterior, premolar and molar regions (p < 0.0001). The rate of height between Side M of fibula and mandible (H (Side M/area)) was significantly larger than H (Side D/area) and H (Side P/area) (p < 0.01). The ratio of W1 between Side D of fibula and mandible (W1 (Side D/area)) was significantly larger than that of W1 (Side M/area) and W1 (side P/area) (p < 0.05). As for the ratio of W2 between fibula and mandible (W2 (plane/area)), there was significant difference among groups (p < 0.01). The distal and middle segments of fibula were suitable for reconstructing the anterior area of mandible and the proximal segment of fibula was more compatible with the premolar and molar areas of mandible.Clinical Relevance Presurgical morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible aids for optimal fibular-based mandibular reconstruction.
Title: Morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible for optimal fibular mandibular reconstruction in a Chinese population
Description:
AbstractTo analyze the morphology of paired fibula and mandible aiming to choose optimal fibular segments for mandibular reconstruction in a Chinses population.
A total of 118 cases of paired mandible and fibula was collected.
All patients were received preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans for mandibular evaluation and CT-angiographical (CTA) examination of the bilateral lower legs, respectively.
The cross-sectional morphological differences between proximal (Side P), middle (Side M) and distal (Side D) segments of fibula and anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible were compared.
The most frequent cross-sectional shape at Side D, Side M and Side P portion of fibula was circular (75.
4%), triangular (67.
8%) and circular (49.
2%), respectively.
In anterior, premolar and molar areas of mandible, the most of the cross-section was s-shape (90.
82%), straight (83.
64%) and oblique (91.
89%), respectively.
The height and width of upper one third (W1) at Side M were significantly larger than those of Side D and Side P (p < 0.
0001).
There was significantly difference of width of lower one third (W2) among three groups (p < 0.
0001).
As for the height and widths of mandible, there was significant difference among anterior, premolar and molar regions (p < 0.
0001).
The rate of height between Side M of fibula and mandible (H (Side M/area)) was significantly larger than H (Side D/area) and H (Side P/area) (p < 0.
01).
The ratio of W1 between Side D of fibula and mandible (W1 (Side D/area)) was significantly larger than that of W1 (Side M/area) and W1 (side P/area) (p < 0.
05).
As for the ratio of W2 between fibula and mandible (W2 (plane/area)), there was significant difference among groups (p < 0.
01).
The distal and middle segments of fibula were suitable for reconstructing the anterior area of mandible and the proximal segment of fibula was more compatible with the premolar and molar areas of mandible.
Clinical Relevance Presurgical morphometric analysis of paired fibula and mandible aids for optimal fibular-based mandibular reconstruction.

Related Results

Osteometric Measures of Mandible on Its Various Aspects in South Indian Dry Skull
Osteometric Measures of Mandible on Its Various Aspects in South Indian Dry Skull
Introduction: Mandible is the single bone articulated with cranium forming a temporomandibular joint and it contributes to the lower jaw containing teeth. The mandible is composed ...
Morphometric Assessment of the Mandible and Mandibular Foramen in the Pakistani Population
Morphometric Assessment of the Mandible and Mandibular Foramen in the Pakistani Population
Objective: Mandibular size and foraminal anatomy vary from population to population because they provide passage to important anatomical structures that have great importance durin...
Mechanical and elemental characterization of ant mandibles: consequences for bite mechanics
Mechanical and elemental characterization of ant mandibles: consequences for bite mechanics
Abstract Chewing with the mandibles is a food processing behavior observed in most current insect lineages. Mandible morphology has an essential ...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Computed tomography‐based morphological analysis for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism
Computed tomography‐based morphological analysis for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism
AbstractAimIntraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) is an orthognathic surgery for patients with jaw deformity. To avoid complications associated with IVRO, understanding the posi...

Back to Top