Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Carbon Dioxide Production From Cogeneration For Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Economic Evaluation

View through CrossRef
Abstract There is a great interest, especially in Western Canada, to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from fossil fuel fired power plants and utilize it as a flooding agent for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. This concept provides two important benefits:captured CO2can be utilized as a flooding agent which would generate revenue from incremental oil production, andCO2 emissions to the atmosphere are reduced, helping to alleviate global warming. In the past few years, a number of feasibility studies and pilot projects on CO2 extraction from power plants have been performed. However, these results have shown that even though it is technically feasible to extract CO2from power plants, the EOR application cost is high in the current crude petroleum market. A major reason for the high cost is that the CO2extracting process requires a substantial amount of steam. This paper will demonstrate how cogeneration concepts would help to reduce CO2 production costs by utilizing low pressure steams and waste heats from various sections of the power generation processes. The economics are based on the installation of a power generation plant and CO2 recovery facility in an existing oil producing facility. Introduction Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) is becoming increasingly popular as primary production methods become less effective. Some typical EOR methods include waterfloods, steamfloods, firefloods, miscible floods and immiscible floods. Miscible and immiscible flooding techniques have proven to be both effective and popular. However, increasing demand for conventional flooding agents, such as propane, ethane, and other lighter end natural gas liquids, has limited its use. As an alternative, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been identified as a prime candidate for replacing these natural gas liquids. Although there is an abundant supply of CO2 being produced annually from various industrial sources, the capture and transportation cost is high for EOR applications. Through the use of cogeneration concepts, this paper will demonstrate how CO2 production costs can be reduced. Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of power, either electrical or mechanical, and useful thermal energy from a single fuel source(1). The principle advantage of cogeneration systems lies in their efficiency and, hence, fuel savings compared to conventional thermal power stations. A typical utility generating station based on condensing steam turbine technology converts less than 40% of fuel energy in its boilers to electricity, with the remainder being rejected to the environment. In cogeneration, this waste heat is utilized as a sequential input into another process, for example, in the production of process steam. Therefore, a cogeneration system can convert 60 to 80% of the available fuel energy into electricity and useful heat. Placing a cogenerating/C02 recovery plant in or near the EOR field can have numerous advantages(2). Some of these include:Field operating costs can be reduced by utilizing produced electricity within EOR operations.The cogeneration plant provides the EOR field operator a means by which shut-in natural gas can be used to produce CO2, electricity, and oil, thereby finding a marketplace for the shut-in gas.
Title: Carbon Dioxide Production From Cogeneration For Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Economic Evaluation
Description:
Abstract There is a great interest, especially in Western Canada, to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from fossil fuel fired power plants and utilize it as a flooding agent for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes.
This concept provides two important benefits:captured CO2can be utilized as a flooding agent which would generate revenue from incremental oil production, andCO2 emissions to the atmosphere are reduced, helping to alleviate global warming.
In the past few years, a number of feasibility studies and pilot projects on CO2 extraction from power plants have been performed.
However, these results have shown that even though it is technically feasible to extract CO2from power plants, the EOR application cost is high in the current crude petroleum market.
A major reason for the high cost is that the CO2extracting process requires a substantial amount of steam.
This paper will demonstrate how cogeneration concepts would help to reduce CO2 production costs by utilizing low pressure steams and waste heats from various sections of the power generation processes.
The economics are based on the installation of a power generation plant and CO2 recovery facility in an existing oil producing facility.
Introduction Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) is becoming increasingly popular as primary production methods become less effective.
Some typical EOR methods include waterfloods, steamfloods, firefloods, miscible floods and immiscible floods.
Miscible and immiscible flooding techniques have proven to be both effective and popular.
However, increasing demand for conventional flooding agents, such as propane, ethane, and other lighter end natural gas liquids, has limited its use.
As an alternative, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been identified as a prime candidate for replacing these natural gas liquids.
Although there is an abundant supply of CO2 being produced annually from various industrial sources, the capture and transportation cost is high for EOR applications.
Through the use of cogeneration concepts, this paper will demonstrate how CO2 production costs can be reduced.
Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of power, either electrical or mechanical, and useful thermal energy from a single fuel source(1).
The principle advantage of cogeneration systems lies in their efficiency and, hence, fuel savings compared to conventional thermal power stations.
A typical utility generating station based on condensing steam turbine technology converts less than 40% of fuel energy in its boilers to electricity, with the remainder being rejected to the environment.
In cogeneration, this waste heat is utilized as a sequential input into another process, for example, in the production of process steam.
Therefore, a cogeneration system can convert 60 to 80% of the available fuel energy into electricity and useful heat.
Placing a cogenerating/C02 recovery plant in or near the EOR field can have numerous advantages(2).
Some of these include:Field operating costs can be reduced by utilizing produced electricity within EOR operations.
The cogeneration plant provides the EOR field operator a means by which shut-in natural gas can be used to produce CO2, electricity, and oil, thereby finding a marketplace for the shut-in gas.

Related Results

Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Dioxide
Abstract The article contains sections titled: ...
Prediction of Carbon Dioxide Production in SAGD Operations
Prediction of Carbon Dioxide Production in SAGD Operations
Abstract In 2007, work was published on the predictability of hydrogen sulphide production in Athabasca SAGD projects. It was possible to predict the hydrogen sul...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Optimization and Design of Carbon Dioxide Flooding
Optimization and Design of Carbon Dioxide Flooding
Abstract Increasing energy demand coupled with public concern for the environment has placed the oil industry in an awkward position as profit-making energy provider...
Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Injection Waters
Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Injection Waters
Publication Rights Reserved, U.S. Government Publication Rights Reserved, U.S. Government This paper was prepared for the 1977 SPE-AIME International Symposium on Oilfield and Geot...
British Food Journal Volume 44 Issue 11 1942
British Food Journal Volume 44 Issue 11 1942
The question whether grape juice may or may not be preserved with sulphur dioxide is one which arises occasionally as a result of a certain ambiguity in the wording of the First Sc...
British Food Journal Volume 48 Issue 4 1946
British Food Journal Volume 48 Issue 4 1946
The recent introduction of the Food Standards (Self‐Raising Flour) Order (S.R. & O. 1946 No. 157) heralds the passing of a period in which a most unfortunate state of affairs h...
Long Term Performance Of Small Cogeneration Units In Oil Field And Gas Plant Operation
Long Term Performance Of Small Cogeneration Units In Oil Field And Gas Plant Operation
Abstract Amoco Production Company installed two of its first onshore cogeneration units during late 1983 and mid-1984 in west-central Wyoming, USA. These 2.4 mega...

Back to Top