Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

FDI and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: does democracy matter?

View through CrossRef
PurposeThis paper investigates whether democracy plays a mediating role in the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis is conducted using fixed effects and system GMM (Generalised Method of Moments) on a panel of 38 Sub-Saharan African countries covering the period of 1990–2018.FindingsThe results find that FDI has no direct effect on inequality whereas democracy reduces inequality directly in both the short run and the long run. The sensitivity analyses find that democracy improves equality regardless of the magnitude of FDI, resource endowment or democratic deepening whereas FDI only reduces inequality once a moderate level of democracy has been achieved.Social implicationsThe results discussed above thus have four policy implications. First, these results show that although democracy has inequality reducing benefits, SSA is unlikely to significantly reduce inequality unless the region purposefully diversifies its trade and FDI away from natural resources. Second, the region should continue to expand credit access to reduce inequality and attract FDI. Third, policymakers should undertake reforms that will reduce youth inequality. Lastly, the region should focus on long-run democratic reforms rather than on short-run democratization to improve governance and investor confidence.Originality/valueAlthough there are existing studies that examine the association between FDI and inequality, FDI and democracy and democracy and inequality, this is the first study to explicitly examine the effect of democracy on the association between FDI and inequality in SSA, and the first study to separately consider the possible varied effects of contemporaneous democratization versus the long-run accumulation of democratic capital. In addition, rather than measure inequality by income alone, this study uses the more appropriate Human Development Index to account for SSA's sociological, education and income disparities.
Title: FDI and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: does democracy matter?
Description:
PurposeThis paper investigates whether democracy plays a mediating role in the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis is conducted using fixed effects and system GMM (Generalised Method of Moments) on a panel of 38 Sub-Saharan African countries covering the period of 1990–2018.
FindingsThe results find that FDI has no direct effect on inequality whereas democracy reduces inequality directly in both the short run and the long run.
The sensitivity analyses find that democracy improves equality regardless of the magnitude of FDI, resource endowment or democratic deepening whereas FDI only reduces inequality once a moderate level of democracy has been achieved.
Social implicationsThe results discussed above thus have four policy implications.
First, these results show that although democracy has inequality reducing benefits, SSA is unlikely to significantly reduce inequality unless the region purposefully diversifies its trade and FDI away from natural resources.
Second, the region should continue to expand credit access to reduce inequality and attract FDI.
Third, policymakers should undertake reforms that will reduce youth inequality.
Lastly, the region should focus on long-run democratic reforms rather than on short-run democratization to improve governance and investor confidence.
Originality/valueAlthough there are existing studies that examine the association between FDI and inequality, FDI and democracy and democracy and inequality, this is the first study to explicitly examine the effect of democracy on the association between FDI and inequality in SSA, and the first study to separately consider the possible varied effects of contemporaneous democratization versus the long-run accumulation of democratic capital.
In addition, rather than measure inequality by income alone, this study uses the more appropriate Human Development Index to account for SSA's sociological, education and income disparities.

Related Results

Does FDI lead to a deterioration of income distribution?: Evidence from Malaysia
Does FDI lead to a deterioration of income distribution?: Evidence from Malaysia
Income inequality has long been a frustrating feature of Malaysian economic development. The country income inequality, represented by the Gini Coefficient has decreased only sligh...
Vote!
Vote!
The twentieth was, from one perspective, the democratic century — a span of one hundred years which began with no fully functioning democracies in existence anywhere on the planet ...
THE ROLE OF INNOVATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FDI AND INCOME INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM A TRANSITION ECONOMY
THE ROLE OF INNOVATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FDI AND INCOME INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM A TRANSITION ECONOMY
This study explores the impact of innovation and foreign direct investment (FDI) on income inequality, emphasizing the moderating role of innovation in the relationship between FDI...
Zakat and Income Inequality in Indonesia: Panel Data Analysis in 34 Provinces
Zakat and Income Inequality in Indonesia: Panel Data Analysis in 34 Provinces
ABSTRAK Tujuan utama dari makalah ini untuk menguji secara empiris pengaruh zakat, Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) perkapita, Upah Minimum Regional/Provinsi (UMP), dan inflas...
Multinational Enterprise, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and Trade Flows: Africa (2008-2014)
Multinational Enterprise, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and Trade Flows: Africa (2008-2014)
Africa’s poor growth performance after decolonization has been called “the worst economic tragedy of the 20th century” (Artadi and Sala-i-Martin, 2004). Between 1960 and 1980, the ...
New Facts about BRIC Multinationals: From Macro to Micro Evidence
New Facts about BRIC Multinationals: From Macro to Micro Evidence
Abstract Purpose In this chapter, we document the growing importance of FDI from BRIC countries in relation to FDI from b...
LEGAL TOOLS AND COMPONENTS FOR ATTRACTING FDI, A COMPARATIVE STUDY: TÜRKİYE AND THE UNITED STATES
LEGAL TOOLS AND COMPONENTS FOR ATTRACTING FDI, A COMPARATIVE STUDY: TÜRKİYE AND THE UNITED STATES
This paper examines the differences and similarities between the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) regulations of Türkiye and the United States (US) and their economic impacts by ana...
Africa-China investment and growth link
Africa-China investment and growth link
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate China–Africa Investment link, using over two decades of FDI’s data. During the specified periods, African economic growth path has been predom...

Back to Top