Investigating the Psychological Impact of Corrective Feedback on ESL Students’ Language Anxiety

This study investigates the psychological impact of corrective feedback on English as a Second Language (ESL) students' language anxiety using a quantitative research approach. Conducted among 80 intermediate-level ESL learners in Lahore and Karachi, Pakistan, the research examines how different types and frequencies of corrective feedback, explicit correction, metalinguistic feedback, recasts, clarification requests, and elicitation, affect learners’ emotional responses. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire incorporating items from the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) and were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and Pearson correlation coefficients. The findings reveal that explicit correction and metalinguistic feedback are most strongly associated with elevated levels of language anxiety, while recasts result in significantly lower anxiety responses. A moderate positive correlation was also found between feedback frequency and anxiety levels, indicating that more frequent corrective input can exacerbate learners' emotional discomfort. These results highlight the need for pedagogical practices that balance effective error correction with emotional sensitivity. The study underscores the importance of using indirect feedback strategies and fostering a psychologically supportive classroom environment to enhance ESL learners' confidence and communicative engagement. References Aljasser, A. (2025). Investigating EFL students’ perceptions of feedback: A comparative study of instructor and ChatGPT-generated responses in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 1-22. Biju, N., Abdelrasheed, N. S. G., Bakiyeva, K., Prasad, K. D. V., & Jember, B. (2024). Which one? AI-assisted language assessment or paper format: An exploration of the impacts on foreign language anxiety, learning attitudes, motivation, and writing performance. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 45. Charalampous, A., & Darra, M. (2025). The effect of teacher's feedback on student academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 42–53. Chen, H., Rasool, U., Hu, T., & Bhattacharyya, E. (2025). Examining the beliefs of non-native English-speaking teachers and EFL students about WCF in enhancing writing skills. Acta Psychologica, 256, 105064. Cheng, X., & Xu, J. (2025). Engaging second language (L2) students with synchronous written corrective feedback in technology-enhanced learning contexts: A mixed-methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–13. Darazi, M. A., Khoso, A. K., & Mahesar, K. A. (2023). Investigating the effects of ESL teachers’ feedback on ESL undergraduate students’ level of motivation, academic performance, and satisfaction: Mediating role of students’ motivation. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 6(2). Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2023). The impact of mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL learners’ speaking performance and anxiety: Does language make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 51(1), 112–130. Gregersen, T. (2023). Feedback matters: Thwarting the negative impact of language anxiety. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 56–63. Hajiyeva, B. (2024). Language anxiety in ESL learners: Causes, effects, and mitigation strategies. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 119–133. Liu, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Yu, P., Tu, Y. F., & Wang, Y. (2025). Effects of an automated corrective feedback-based peer assessment approach on students’ learning achievement, motivation, and self-regulated learning conceptions in foreign language pronunciation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-22. Mao, Z., Lee, I., & Li, S. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching, 1-29. Patra, I., Alazemi, A., Al-Jamal, D., & Gheisari, A. (2022). The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL). Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 19. Rassaei, E. (2023). The interplay between corrective feedback timing and foreign language anxiety in L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 13621688231195141. Sari, E., & Han, T. (2024). The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners' writing self-efficacy, self-regulation, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2065–2080. Shahid, N., Asif, M., & Pasha, D. A. (2022). Effect of Internet Addiction on School Going Children. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 13–55. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v1i1.3 Wang, D. (2024). Teacher-versus AI-generated (Poe application) corrective feedback and language learners’ writing anxiety, complexity, fluency, and accuracy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 37–56. Wang, J., Zhou, T., & Fan, C. (2025). Impact of communication anxiety on L2 WTC of middle school students: Mediating effects of growth language mindset and language learning motivation. PLoS ONE, 20(1), e0304750. Watcharapol, W., Phornrat, T., Teavakorn, K., Tidarat, N., Kanokpan, W., Somkiat, K., & Nattawut, J. (2023). Preferences for oral corrective feedback: Are language proficiency, first language, foreign language classroom anxiety, and enjoyment involved? Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 172–184. Xiong, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, L., Liu, S., Guan, H., Sui, Y., ... & Lee, K. M. R. (2024). A meta-analysis and systematic review of foreign language anxiety interventions among students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 43(5-6), 620–650.