Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Wildlife fencing at German highways and federal roads – requirements and management implications
View through CrossRef
In Germany, the high risk of wildlife–vehicle collisions (WVC) is further increasing due to increasing traffic volumes and road densities as well as the growing population densities of common ungulate species. As a result, threats to human health and property as well as wildlife mortality of widely spread and rare species increase. Currently, three basic types of wildlife fences are used in Germany: type A, a conventional galvanized‐high tensile deer fence (made of knot braid); type B, a chain wire (mesh wire) fence; type C, a rigid welded wire mesh fence panels. Since fencing needs to restrict access of many different species with different behaviours (e.g. jumping, climbing, digging), fencing needs to be multifaceted to be effectively. Furthermore, the occurrence of wildlife species with habits such as jumping, climbing or digging determines the optimal (functional) fence design per location. We surveyed road managers in combination with a personal assessment of road sections in Germany and derived the following recommendations for optimal fencing to reduce WVC: 1) To deter digging, use plates made of recycled synthetic materials or a concrete foundation, instead of barbed wire. 2) Fencing should be made of chain wire (mesh wire, type B) fence or rigid welded wire mesh fence panels (type C) instead of knot braid mesh (type A). 3) To restrict climbing, use angled chain wire fence or rigid welded wire mesh fence panels at the top of the fences. 4) Maintain fences so that they are kept free from ingrown vegetation/woods. Maintenance conditions should be considered while planning and building the fence, especially to ensure sufficient space on both sides for accessibility. 5) Fencing should be established preferably near the roadside and moved away from property lines. In conclusion, wildlife fencing could be a very effective mitigation measure to prevent WVC with common as well as protected species, when proper designed and recommendations of the survey will be consequently considered. Currently many wildlife fences lack functionality due to an inappropriate design and maintenance issues in Germany.
Title: Wildlife fencing at German highways and federal roads – requirements and management implications
Description:
In Germany, the high risk of wildlife–vehicle collisions (WVC) is further increasing due to increasing traffic volumes and road densities as well as the growing population densities of common ungulate species.
As a result, threats to human health and property as well as wildlife mortality of widely spread and rare species increase.
Currently, three basic types of wildlife fences are used in Germany: type A, a conventional galvanized‐high tensile deer fence (made of knot braid); type B, a chain wire (mesh wire) fence; type C, a rigid welded wire mesh fence panels.
Since fencing needs to restrict access of many different species with different behaviours (e.
g.
jumping, climbing, digging), fencing needs to be multifaceted to be effectively.
Furthermore, the occurrence of wildlife species with habits such as jumping, climbing or digging determines the optimal (functional) fence design per location.
We surveyed road managers in combination with a personal assessment of road sections in Germany and derived the following recommendations for optimal fencing to reduce WVC: 1) To deter digging, use plates made of recycled synthetic materials or a concrete foundation, instead of barbed wire.
2) Fencing should be made of chain wire (mesh wire, type B) fence or rigid welded wire mesh fence panels (type C) instead of knot braid mesh (type A).
3) To restrict climbing, use angled chain wire fence or rigid welded wire mesh fence panels at the top of the fences.
4) Maintain fences so that they are kept free from ingrown vegetation/woods.
Maintenance conditions should be considered while planning and building the fence, especially to ensure sufficient space on both sides for accessibility.
5) Fencing should be established preferably near the roadside and moved away from property lines.
In conclusion, wildlife fencing could be a very effective mitigation measure to prevent WVC with common as well as protected species, when proper designed and recommendations of the survey will be consequently considered.
Currently many wildlife fences lack functionality due to an inappropriate design and maintenance issues in Germany.
Related Results
The McDonaldization of Fencing. The Tauberbischofsheim Coaching Method as a Turning Point in the History of Fencing
The McDonaldization of Fencing. The Tauberbischofsheim Coaching Method as a Turning Point in the History of Fencing
In the early 1970s, the German fencing coach Emil Beck invented a new training model that deviated from the traditional French and Italian schools. Beck's model, named for the fenc...
Smart Roads and Parking
Smart Roads and Parking
The past few years, innovation and technology have reached new heights, much beyond laptops, iPads or smart phones. Innovation and technology is progressing with each passing day. ...
Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Crop Loss Caused by Wildlife
Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Crop Loss Caused by Wildlife
The scope of wildlife has expanded with the implementation of ecological restoration projects. Therefore, the number of conflicts between humans and wildlife in agricultural produc...
Wildlife as sentinels for emerging zoonotic diseases: A review of surveillance systems in the USA
Wildlife as sentinels for emerging zoonotic diseases: A review of surveillance systems in the USA
Wildlife plays a crucial role as sentinels for emerging zoonotic diseases, serving as early indicators of potential threats to human and animal health. This review examines the sur...
Wildlife law and policy
Wildlife law and policy
One of the crucial issues of our decades is how to stop the loss of biodiversity. Policy–makers need reliable data to base their decisions on. Managing wildlife p...
Strengthening Capability for Oiled Wildlife Management in Trinidad and Tobago
Strengthening Capability for Oiled Wildlife Management in Trinidad and Tobago
Abstract
Despite Trinidad and Tobago having the highest biodiversity in the Caribbean and being an oil and gas producer for over 100 years, there is no approved syst...
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
Purpose: To establish the pastoralist-wildlife relationship in the Amboseli Ecosystem South Eastern Kenya.Methodology: The study utilized a descriptive research design.Findings: Re...
Wildlife at Airports
Wildlife at Airports
Collisions between aircraft and wildlife (wildlife strikes) are common occurrences across the developed world. Wildlife strikes are not only numerous, but also costly. Estimates su...

