Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective: To evaluate quantitatively articles that compared effects of second and third generation oral contraceptives on risk of venous thrombosis. Design: Meta-analysis. Studies: Cohort and case-control studies assessing risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral contraceptives before October 1995. Main outcome measures: Pooled adjusted odds ratios calculated by a general variance based random effects method. When possible, two by two tables were extracted and combined by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: The overall adjusted odds ratio for third versus second generation oral contraceptives was 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 2.0; seven studies). Similar risks were found when oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene were compared with those containing levonorgestrel. Among first time users, the odds ratio for third versus second generation preparations was 3.1 (2.0 to 4.6; four studies). The odds ratio was 2.5 (1.6 to 4.1; five studies) for short term users compared with 2.0 (1.4 to 2.7; five studies) for longer term users. The odds ratio was 1.3 (1.0 to 1.7) in studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.2) in other studies. Differences in age and certainty of diagnosis of venous thrombosis did not affect the results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the view that third generation oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives. The increase cannot be explained by several potential biases. What is already known on this topic Third generation oral contraceptives have been reported to increase the risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives The findings have been vigorously debated, with suggestions that the results can be explained by confounding or bias, or both. What this study adds Women taking third generation oral contraceptives have a 1.7-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with those taking second generation oral contraceptives Risk is highest in first time users The biases were not large enough to account for the observed results
Title: Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract Objective: To evaluate quantitatively articles that compared effects of second and third generation oral contraceptives on risk of venous thrombosis.
Design: Meta-analysis.
Studies: Cohort and case-control studies assessing risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral contraceptives before October 1995.
Main outcome measures: Pooled adjusted odds ratios calculated by a general variance based random effects method.
When possible, two by two tables were extracted and combined by the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Results: The overall adjusted odds ratio for third versus second generation oral contraceptives was 1.
7 (95% confidence interval 1.
4 to 2.
0; seven studies).
Similar risks were found when oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene were compared with those containing levonorgestrel.
Among first time users, the odds ratio for third versus second generation preparations was 3.
1 (2.
0 to 4.
6; four studies).
The odds ratio was 2.
5 (1.
6 to 4.
1; five studies) for short term users compared with 2.
0 (1.
4 to 2.
7; five studies) for longer term users.
The odds ratio was 1.
3 (1.
0 to 1.
7) in studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry and 2.
3 (1.
7 to 3.
2) in other studies.
Differences in age and certainty of diagnosis of venous thrombosis did not affect the results.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the view that third generation oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives.
The increase cannot be explained by several potential biases.
What is already known on this topic Third generation oral contraceptives have been reported to increase the risk of venous thrombosis compared with second generation oral contraceptives The findings have been vigorously debated, with suggestions that the results can be explained by confounding or bias, or both.
What this study adds Women taking third generation oral contraceptives have a 1.
7-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with those taking second generation oral contraceptives Risk is highest in first time users The biases were not large enough to account for the observed results.

Related Results

The Prevalence of JAK2 Mutation in High-Altitude Patients with Unprovoked Thrombosis and Thrombosis at Unusual Sites
The Prevalence of JAK2 Mutation in High-Altitude Patients with Unprovoked Thrombosis and Thrombosis at Unusual Sites
Introduction Thrombosis, both arterial and venous, is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Thrombosis can ...
Aspiration thrombectomy for the management of acute deep venous thrombosis in the setting of venous thoracic outlet syndrome
Aspiration thrombectomy for the management of acute deep venous thrombosis in the setting of venous thoracic outlet syndrome
Objectives Venous thoracic outlet syndrome, known by the eponym Paget–Schroetter syndrome, is seen in healthy, young individuals with “effort-induced thrombosis...
The use of contraceptives and its relationship with chronic venous insufficiency
The use of contraceptives and its relationship with chronic venous insufficiency
Introduction: Combined oral contraceptives (COC's) are widely used due to their efficacy in contraception, with an efficacy rate of up to 99% when used correctly. However, its use ...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Venous Thromboembolism in Denmark: Seasonality in Occurrence and Mortality
Venous Thromboembolism in Denmark: Seasonality in Occurrence and Mortality
Background Many cardiovascular conditions exhibit seasonality in occurrence and mortality, but little is known about the seasonality of venous thromboembolism. Methods ...
Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation
Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation
OBJECTIVE: Hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation is uncommon, but represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to identify the...
Ten-year trends in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treatment and referral pathways
Ten-year trends in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treatment and referral pathways
Objectives Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis is associated with an increased risk of developing post-thrombotic syndrome resulting in reduced quality of life. ...
Direct costs for treatment of venous thromboembolism complication 90-day after surgery
Direct costs for treatment of venous thromboembolism complication 90-day after surgery
Study object: Describe the direct treatment costs due to venous thromboembolism complications 90 days after surgery by using national health insurance reimbursement database. Patie...

Back to Top