Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability Knowledge

View through CrossRef
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable business models and life styles. Outlining seventeen concrete sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015). However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow. Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its principles. This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially insufficient knowledge management processes. It proposes that sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps: 1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3) How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT). Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT). Fewer models consider the second step, COLLECT. The necessity to identify knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent. Given the complex nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently, knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to support organizations in their transformational change towards sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder partnerships. Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in knowledge management research for sustainability. Further limiting is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge. This paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed development of effective knowledge management strategies.
Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd
Title: The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability Knowledge
Description:
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable business models and life styles.
Outlining seventeen concrete sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015).
However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow.
Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its principles.
This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially insufficient knowledge management processes.
It proposes that sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps: 1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3) How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT).
Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT).
Fewer models consider the second step, COLLECT.
The necessity to identify knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent.
Given the complex nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently, knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to support organizations in their transformational change towards sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder partnerships.
Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in knowledge management research for sustainability.
Further limiting is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge.
This paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed development of effective knowledge management strategies.

Related Results

Perspektif Demografis dan Perilaku Status Quo Terhadap Perubahan di Perguruan Tinggi: Suatu Tinjauan Keislaman
Perspektif Demografis dan Perilaku Status Quo Terhadap Perubahan di Perguruan Tinggi: Suatu Tinjauan Keislaman
Dynamic change has occurred not only in business and governmental organizations but also in higher education. The implications are not merely practical but can also be studied psyc...
Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting in Islamic Banks: The Case of Albaraka Türk Participation Bank
Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting in Islamic Banks: The Case of Albaraka Türk Participation Bank
Sustainability refers to the capacity to meet the needs of both present and future generations. Given the serious dimensions of environmental destruction, sustainability is primari...
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Purpose– This paper aims to, with the continuous take-up of sustainability issues by companies and with the growing experience companies gain in dealing with this topic, raise the ...
Enhancing operational performance through organizational culture: exploring social sustainability focus and practices in supply chains
Enhancing operational performance through organizational culture: exploring social sustainability focus and practices in supply chains
Sustainable supply chain practices involve a range of initiatives that are critical for global supply chains, including health and safety, child and slave labour, working condition...
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF FISHERIES REBUILDING: SIX CANADIAN CASE STUDIES
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF FISHERIES REBUILDING: SIX CANADIAN CASE STUDIES
Many fish populations in Canada are depleted and at risk of further decline. Fisheries loss jeopardizes the social, economic, and health well-being of thousands of Canadians and is...

Back to Top