Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability Knowledge

View through CrossRef
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable business models and life styles. Outlining seventeen concrete sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015). However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow. Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its principles. This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially insufficient knowledge management processes. It proposes that sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps: 1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3) How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT). Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT). Fewer models consider the second step, COLLECT. The necessity to identify knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent. Given the complex nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently, knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to support organizations in their transformational change towards sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder partnerships. Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in knowledge management research for sustainability. Further limiting is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge. This paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed development of effective knowledge management strategies.
Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd
Title: The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability Knowledge
Description:
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable business models and life styles.
Outlining seventeen concrete sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015).
However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow.
Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its principles.
This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially insufficient knowledge management processes.
It proposes that sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps: 1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3) How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT).
Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT).
Fewer models consider the second step, COLLECT.
The necessity to identify knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent.
Given the complex nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently, knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to support organizations in their transformational change towards sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder partnerships.
Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in knowledge management research for sustainability.
Further limiting is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge.
This paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed development of effective knowledge management strategies.

Related Results

Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Purpose– This paper aims to, with the continuous take-up of sustainability issues by companies and with the growing experience companies gain in dealing with this topic, raise the ...
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
As our world grapples with the profound challenges of the 21st century, the concept of sustainability has emerged as a guiding light, illuminating the path towards a more equitable...
Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
Abstract Qui pro quo is an excellent means of creating a comic effect in ancient drama, particularly in the comedies of Plautus. In this study, qu...
INCLUDING SUSTAINABILITY PEDAGOGY AND CURRICULA
INCLUDING SUSTAINABILITY PEDAGOGY AND CURRICULA
This paper presents a study on the interaction between sustainability pedagogy and curricula within systemic structures. Environment advancement the natural world and human society...
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
In three studies, we build on Schwartz’s (1992, 1994) work on universal values to explore the content and structure of individuals’ change and status quo values, to distinguish the...
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
In three studies, we build on Schwartz’s (1992, 1994) work on universal values to explore the content and structure of individuals’ change and status quo values, to distinguish the...
Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Civil and Geotechnical Design for Energy Infrastructure
Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Civil and Geotechnical Design for Energy Infrastructure
The global shift towards sustainable development has placed increasing emphasis on the integration of environmental sustainability within the design, construction, and management o...

Back to Top