Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability Knowledge
View through CrossRef
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable
development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable
business models and life styles. Outlining seventeen concrete
sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals
are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015).
However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow.
Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as
socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to
understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its
principles. This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons
for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required
knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially
insufficient knowledge management processes. It proposes that
sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps:
1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How
to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning
strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3)
How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management
practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT).
Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management
models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT). Fewer
models consider the second step, COLLECT. The necessity to identify
knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent. Given the complex
nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently,
knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to
support organizations in their transformational change towards
sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder
partnerships. Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in
knowledge management research for sustainability. Further limiting
is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge. This
paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what
sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed
development of effective knowledge management strategies.
Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd
Title: The Status quo of Knowledge Management and Sustainability
Knowledge
Description:
The United Nations (UN) 2030 agenda for sustainable
development issues an urgent call to transition to sustainable
business models and life styles.
Outlining seventeen concrete
sustainable development goals (SDGs), organizations and individuals
are encouraged to actively participate (United Nations, 2015).
However, as of the 2019 report on the SDGs, progress is slow.
Organizations that aspire to be economically viable as well as
socially and environmentally responsible global citizens, need to
understand what sustainability means and how to institutionalize its
principles.
This paper posits that some of the underlying reasons
for slow progress are lack of full understanding of the required
knowledge and its systemic nature, as well as potentially
insufficient knowledge management processes.
It proposes that
sustainability knowledge learning should include three “DCA” steps:
1) What to know: identify which knowledge is needed (DEFINE); 2) How
to learn : develop strategies to identify sources and learning
strategies for the requisite sustainability knowledge (COLLECT); 3)
How to use sustainability knowledge: develop knowledge management
practices that enable absorption and institutionalization (ACT).
Comparing the DCA model to other sustainability knowledge management
models reveals that internal processes are emphasized (ACT).
Fewer
models consider the second step, COLLECT.
The necessity to identify
knowledge needs, DEFINE is almost entirely absent.
Given the complex
nature of sustainability knowledge, it appears that currently,
knowledge management practices may be inadequately designed to
support organizations in their transformational change towards
sustainability and in the development of required stakeholder
partnerships.
Said systemic nature is also ill reflected in
knowledge management research for sustainability.
Further limiting
is a lack of a clear definition of sustainability knowledge.
This
paper is a call for research to establish a clear view of what
sustainability knowledge is, and based on that, a more detailed
development of effective knowledge management strategies.
Related Results
correlation of human capital sustainability leadership style and resilience of the managers in airline operations group of an AIRLINE Company
correlation of human capital sustainability leadership style and resilience of the managers in airline operations group of an AIRLINE Company
This study aimed to analyze the correlation between Human Capital Sustainability Leadership style and manager resilience through a pragmatic worldview. Using explanatory sequential...
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Gatekeepers of sustainability information: exploring the roles of accountants
Purpose– This paper aims to, with the continuous take-up of sustainability issues by companies and with the growing experience companies gain in dealing with this topic, raise the ...
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
Editorial: New Paradigms of Sustainability in the Contemporary Era
As our world grapples with the profound challenges of the 21st century, the concept of sustainability has emerged as a guiding light, illuminating the path towards a more equitable...
Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
Abstract
Qui pro quo is an excellent means of creating a comic effect in ancient drama, particularly in the comedies of Plautus. In this study, qu...
INCLUDING SUSTAINABILITY PEDAGOGY AND CURRICULA
INCLUDING SUSTAINABILITY PEDAGOGY AND CURRICULA
This paper presents a study on the interaction between sustainability pedagogy and curricula within systemic structures. Environment advancement the natural world and human society...
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
In three studies, we build on Schwartz’s (1992, 1994) work on universal values to explore the content and structure of individuals’ change and status quo values, to distinguish the...
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
Personal values about change and status quo influence outsiders' appraisals of intergroup conflict
In three studies, we build on Schwartz’s (1992, 1994) work on universal values to explore the content and structure of individuals’ change and status quo values, to distinguish the...
Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Civil and Geotechnical Design for Energy Infrastructure
Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Civil and Geotechnical Design for Energy Infrastructure
The global shift towards sustainable development has placed increasing emphasis on the integration of environmental
sustainability within the design, construction, and management o...

