Javascript must be enabled to continue!
General Rosecrans' Forthright Diplomacy with Juárez's Mexico, 1868-1869
View through CrossRef
One Mexican historian has described the post-war years of Benito Juárez' Administration (1867-72) in Mexico and that of his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada (1872-76) as “a dictatorship without peace or progress.” The nation suffered from a breakdown in public order and morality; misery, anarchy and banditry were widespread. Indian uprisings occurred in Yucatán, Chiapas, Durango, Chihuahua, Nuevo León and Coahuila. Insurrections against the government of Juárez broke out in Tamaulipas, Puebla, Sinaloa, Jalisco, Guerrero; and conflicts between candidates for the government in Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and San Luis Potosi destroyed the public order. The causes of this breakdown in commonweal may be attributed to the long history of civil war in Mexico, the inadequacy of governmental institutions and lack of respect for a Constitution (1857) which incorporated many injustices within its Liberal framework. An important cause of recurring revolt was the presidential ambition of Juárez and his conflicts with Congress and the Supreme Court. His suspension of the Constitutional guarantees, by decree of January 17, 1870, and his dictatorial use of extraordinary powers brought much resentment; and, in the election of 1870, the Constitutional Party (Liberal) supported Porifirio Díaz against Juárez. Through a “reform” of the electoral law, Benito Juárez was able to gain a plurality. He was only exceeded in his autocratic use of power by his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada who vigorously enforced theReform Lawsthat made of the anti-Church program a Lerdistkulturkampf. It was during a year of Juárez' Administration that Brevet Major General William S. Rosecrans served as Envoy Extraordinary & Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States to Mexico. Officially he held this post from July 27, 1968 to June 26, 1869. The American Minister spoke bluntly in criticism of the Juárez Administration, and of Lerdo de Tejada who was then President of the Supreme Court, a position equivalent to the Vice-presidency.
Title: General Rosecrans' Forthright Diplomacy with Juárez's Mexico, 1868-1869
Description:
One Mexican historian has described the post-war years of Benito Juárez' Administration (1867-72) in Mexico and that of his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada (1872-76) as “a dictatorship without peace or progress.
” The nation suffered from a breakdown in public order and morality; misery, anarchy and banditry were widespread.
Indian uprisings occurred in Yucatán, Chiapas, Durango, Chihuahua, Nuevo León and Coahuila.
Insurrections against the government of Juárez broke out in Tamaulipas, Puebla, Sinaloa, Jalisco, Guerrero; and conflicts between candidates for the government in Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and San Luis Potosi destroyed the public order.
The causes of this breakdown in commonweal may be attributed to the long history of civil war in Mexico, the inadequacy of governmental institutions and lack of respect for a Constitution (1857) which incorporated many injustices within its Liberal framework.
An important cause of recurring revolt was the presidential ambition of Juárez and his conflicts with Congress and the Supreme Court.
His suspension of the Constitutional guarantees, by decree of January 17, 1870, and his dictatorial use of extraordinary powers brought much resentment; and, in the election of 1870, the Constitutional Party (Liberal) supported Porifirio Díaz against Juárez.
Through a “reform” of the electoral law, Benito Juárez was able to gain a plurality.
He was only exceeded in his autocratic use of power by his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada who vigorously enforced theReform Lawsthat made of the anti-Church program a Lerdistkulturkampf.
It was during a year of Juárez' Administration that Brevet Major General William S.
Rosecrans served as Envoy Extraordinary & Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States to Mexico.
Officially he held this post from July 27, 1968 to June 26, 1869.
The American Minister spoke bluntly in criticism of the Juárez Administration, and of Lerdo de Tejada who was then President of the Supreme Court, a position equivalent to the Vice-presidency.
Related Results
Science Diplomacy
Science Diplomacy
Science diplomacy emerged in the early years of the 21st century as a new vocabulary and a new concept in international relations, although the practice of science diplomacy has de...
Cultural diplomacy: symbiosis of cultural and legal potential
Cultural diplomacy: symbiosis of cultural and legal potential
Problem setting. The study of the potential of cultural diplomacy has been growing rapidly in recent times. This is due to the realization of the failures of traditional and «force...
Analisis Diplomasi Pertahanan Negara Dalam Pandangan Chanakya (Studi Teks Arthashastra Sebagai Dasar Strategi Diplomasi Pertahanan)
Analisis Diplomasi Pertahanan Negara Dalam Pandangan Chanakya (Studi Teks Arthashastra Sebagai Dasar Strategi Diplomasi Pertahanan)
Abstrak -- Diplomasi pertahanan merupakan kajian baru dalam ilmu HI, utamanya diplomasi. Hal ini membuat kajian-kajian yang berkembang dalam diplomasi pertahanan masih minim dan di...
Public Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy
Public diplomacy is a relatively young concept and a field of study that has produced a deluge of literature since the turn of the century. The learning curve has been considerable...
China’s Public Diplomacy at the Present Stage
China’s Public Diplomacy at the Present Stage
The purpose of the research. The article examines the current state of public diplomacy research in China. The subject, object, method and purpose of public diplomacy are analyzed....
FINANCIAL DIPLOMACY IN INTERDISCIPLINARY DISCOURSE
FINANCIAL DIPLOMACY IN INTERDISCIPLINARY DISCOURSE
Introduction. Global transformation processes, the globalization of the financial sphere in particular, which have intensified at the turn of the XX – XXI centuries, created new pr...
Humanitarian diplomacy
Humanitarian diplomacy
Problem setting. Ensuring constant access to humanitarian aid during military conflicts and complex emergencies has always been an important issue for politicians. Its solution is ...
WORLD ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY
WORLD ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY
Traditional studies in the field of diplomacy have long been based on realistic and neorealistic approaches to international relations, which gave rise to a state-centric analysis ...

