Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Greek and Indo-European

View through CrossRef
With an attested history of more than 3,000 years, Greek is one of the languages central for the reconstruction of the common proto-language of the Indo-European language family that also comprises the Celtic, Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Indo-Aryan, Tocharian and Anatolian (including e.g., Hittite and Luwian), Armenian, and Albanian subphyla. The earliest documentation of Greek is clay tablets written in a syllabic script, Linear B, from the second half of the second millennium bce, the earliest specimens of which date back to about 1450 bce. After the collapse of the Mycenaean palatial culture in the twelfth century, written documents reappear in different scripts from the eleventh century onward, in a syllabic script on Cyprus and in what became the common Greek alphabet adapted from the Phoenician script probably in the ninth century. Greek phonology is comparatively conservative, which makes it an important comparandum for the reconstruction of the phonological system of the proto-language (Proto-Indo-European, or PIE), including the triple representation of the PIE “laryngeals” *h1/2/3 visible in this language, while other branches show a single reflex, such as <ḫ> in Anatolian or a vowel such as /i/ in Sanskrit, /a/ in Latin, etc., or no reflex at all. While Greek nominal morphology is considerably reduced in complexity in comparison to that of other languages such as Sanskrit and Old Church Slavonic, its verbal morphology is roughly as rich in categories as that of the other languages of “Core Indo-European,”, i.e., the subphyla mentioned above, excluding Anatolian with a much simpler system. The rich and early documentation of Greek makes it an important contributor for historical linguistics both for reconstruction and for the study of language change in general. The former includes questions of historical syntax such as basic word order, the positioning of clitics, etc., and the field of PIE “realia” as visible in the Greek lexicon and the corresponding etyma in other languages, ranging from agricultural terminology such as ζυγόν ‘yoke’ = Skt. yugam, Lat. iugum, etc., PIE *i̯ugom, and βοῦς ‘cow’ = Skt. gauḥ, Lat. bōs, etc., PIE *gu̯ōu̯s, to words for divinities such as the personified daylight sky Zεύς = Skt. Dyauḥ, invoked as ‘father Sky’ in Greek Ζεῦ πάτερ = Lat. Iū-piter, Skt. nom. Dyauḥ pitā). The following annotated bibliography tries to capture major reference works and studies on the prehistory, internal history, and synchronic analysis of the Greek language, with a focus on Ancient Greek.
Oxford University Press
Title: Greek and Indo-European
Description:
With an attested history of more than 3,000 years, Greek is one of the languages central for the reconstruction of the common proto-language of the Indo-European language family that also comprises the Celtic, Germanic, Baltic, Slavic, Indo-Aryan, Tocharian and Anatolian (including e.
g.
, Hittite and Luwian), Armenian, and Albanian subphyla.
The earliest documentation of Greek is clay tablets written in a syllabic script, Linear B, from the second half of the second millennium bce, the earliest specimens of which date back to about 1450 bce.
After the collapse of the Mycenaean palatial culture in the twelfth century, written documents reappear in different scripts from the eleventh century onward, in a syllabic script on Cyprus and in what became the common Greek alphabet adapted from the Phoenician script probably in the ninth century.
Greek phonology is comparatively conservative, which makes it an important comparandum for the reconstruction of the phonological system of the proto-language (Proto-Indo-European, or PIE), including the triple representation of the PIE “laryngeals” *h1/2/3 visible in this language, while other branches show a single reflex, such as <ḫ> in Anatolian or a vowel such as /i/ in Sanskrit, /a/ in Latin, etc.
, or no reflex at all.
While Greek nominal morphology is considerably reduced in complexity in comparison to that of other languages such as Sanskrit and Old Church Slavonic, its verbal morphology is roughly as rich in categories as that of the other languages of “Core Indo-European,”, i.
e.
, the subphyla mentioned above, excluding Anatolian with a much simpler system.
The rich and early documentation of Greek makes it an important contributor for historical linguistics both for reconstruction and for the study of language change in general.
The former includes questions of historical syntax such as basic word order, the positioning of clitics, etc.
, and the field of PIE “realia” as visible in the Greek lexicon and the corresponding etyma in other languages, ranging from agricultural terminology such as ζυγόν ‘yoke’ = Skt.
yugam, Lat.
iugum, etc.
, PIE *i̯ugom, and βοῦς ‘cow’ = Skt.
gauḥ, Lat.
bōs, etc.
, PIE *gu̯ōu̯s, to words for divinities such as the personified daylight sky Zεύς = Skt.
Dyauḥ, invoked as ‘father Sky’ in Greek Ζεῦ πάτερ = Lat.
Iū-piter, Skt.
nom.
Dyauḥ pitā).
The following annotated bibliography tries to capture major reference works and studies on the prehistory, internal history, and synchronic analysis of the Greek language, with a focus on Ancient Greek.

Related Results

Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
A different name than English literature, ‘Anglo-Indian Literature’, was given to the body of literature in English that emerged on account of the British interaction with India un...
Indo-European Religions
Indo-European Religions
Indo-European religions does not mean the religion of the Indo-Europeans. The notion of Indo-European is essentially based on linguistic evidence, that is, the systematic homologie...
INDONESIA'S DIGITAL DIPLOMACY STRATEGY TOWARD THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION
INDONESIA'S DIGITAL DIPLOMACY STRATEGY TOWARD THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION
Abstrak Indo-Pasifik ialah konsep geografi yang meliputi kawasan Lautan Hindi dan Lautan Pasifik. Kawasan yang luas di rantau Indo-Pasifik dan ramai pelakon yang terlibat telah men...
Mount Parnassos and the Labyrinth: From Korinthos to Knossos, from Zakynthos to Halicarnassus
Mount Parnassos and the Labyrinth: From Korinthos to Knossos, from Zakynthos to Halicarnassus
This paper revisits the Greek *-nthos- and *-ssos/*-ttos names and analyzes them in the context of the language contacts between the Pre-Proto-Greek peoples arriving in Greece and ...
Attitudes towards Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek in London’s Greek Cypriot community
Attitudes towards Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek in London’s Greek Cypriot community
Aim: To investigate whether the positive attitudes towards Standard Modern Greek and the mixture of positive and negative attitudes towards Cypriot Greek that h...
The Nuristani languages
The Nuristani languages
In the context of the problems connected with the early migrations of the Indo-Iranian peoples and the entry of the Indo-Aryans into India, the question of where and when the ances...
Éléments de l'Iran et du Proche-Orient anciens dans l'art scythe
Éléments de l'Iran et du Proche-Orient anciens dans l'art scythe
Animal-style art developed in the Eurasian steppelands between the VIth and IVth centuries B.C. It was characterised by the prevalence of zoomorphic images interpreted in a definit...
Case Markers in Indo-Aryan
Case Markers in Indo-Aryan
Indo-Aryan languages have the longest documented historical record, with the earliest attested texts going back to 1900 bce. Old Indo-Aryan (Vedic, Sanskrit) had an inflectional ca...

Back to Top