Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Research on the Governance form Mechanism of Platform Enterprise Monopoly Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

View through CrossRef
Abstract Platform enterprises, which aggregate numerous and scattered resources, connect multiple interdependent parties and facilitate interactions and transactions, also confront significant monopoly market challenges. These issues constrain the platform economy’s healthy development and severely disrupt the normal market order. This paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model comprising the government, platform enterprises, and users, to investigate the governance mechanisms of monopoly behavior in platform enterprises and employs Matlab for numerical simulation. The results indicate that government rewards, additional profits, monopoly penalties, and user collaboration positively impact the evolution of platform enterprise strategies toward non-monopolistic practices. Together, these four mechanisms constitute the governance mechanism for monopoly behavior in platform enterprises. Specifically, providing honorary rewards for non-monopolistic behavior in platform enterprises over a certain period is essential, as it represents an effective means for the government to encourage innovative development in internet platform enterprises. The profit mechanism is the main driving force behind platform enterprises adopting monopolistic strategies and facilitating their survival and development. To a certain extent, the penalty mechanism can suppress monopolistic behaviors in platform enterprises, but it cannot fundamentally eliminate them. Instead, this mechanism accelerates the evolution of platform enterprises towards non-monopolistic behaviors, marking it as a positive governance tool. The user collaboration mechanism, a form of collaborative governance, serves as a beneficial complement to the reward, penalty, and profit mechanisms. This is because users primarily engage with platforms as consumers, legally entitled to services, and their regulatory role constitutes only a part of their responsibilities, not the main economic activity on digital platforms.
Title: Research on the Governance form Mechanism of Platform Enterprise Monopoly Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game Theory
Description:
Abstract Platform enterprises, which aggregate numerous and scattered resources, connect multiple interdependent parties and facilitate interactions and transactions, also confront significant monopoly market challenges.
These issues constrain the platform economy’s healthy development and severely disrupt the normal market order.
This paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model comprising the government, platform enterprises, and users, to investigate the governance mechanisms of monopoly behavior in platform enterprises and employs Matlab for numerical simulation.
The results indicate that government rewards, additional profits, monopoly penalties, and user collaboration positively impact the evolution of platform enterprise strategies toward non-monopolistic practices.
Together, these four mechanisms constitute the governance mechanism for monopoly behavior in platform enterprises.
Specifically, providing honorary rewards for non-monopolistic behavior in platform enterprises over a certain period is essential, as it represents an effective means for the government to encourage innovative development in internet platform enterprises.
The profit mechanism is the main driving force behind platform enterprises adopting monopolistic strategies and facilitating their survival and development.
To a certain extent, the penalty mechanism can suppress monopolistic behaviors in platform enterprises, but it cannot fundamentally eliminate them.
Instead, this mechanism accelerates the evolution of platform enterprises towards non-monopolistic behaviors, marking it as a positive governance tool.
The user collaboration mechanism, a form of collaborative governance, serves as a beneficial complement to the reward, penalty, and profit mechanisms.
This is because users primarily engage with platforms as consumers, legally entitled to services, and their regulatory role constitutes only a part of their responsibilities, not the main economic activity on digital platforms.

Related Results

Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Solomon’s article and Binmore’s response exemplify a standard exchange between the game theorist and those critical of applying game theory to ethics. The critic of game theory lis...
Productivity Measure in Using Enterprise Resource Planning System in Selected Companies in Beijing, China
Productivity Measure in Using Enterprise Resource Planning System in Selected Companies in Beijing, China
With the globalization of economic development and social development, the business environment of enterprises has changed. Only by continuously improving the digital level and man...
Cooperation strategy of government-enterprise supply chain finance based on differential game
Cooperation strategy of government-enterprise supply chain finance based on differential game
PurposeThe government plays an important role in the financing process of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), but the current government-enterprise cooperation (GEC) mechanism can...
Evolution and the cell
Evolution and the cell
Genotype to phenotype, and back again Evolution is intimately linked to biology at the cellular scale- evolutionary processes act on the very genetic material that is carried and ...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
Background and Aim: College physical education (CPE) is a Key Stage in the transition from school physical education to national sports. Collaborative governance is an effective ne...
CORPORATE CULTURE AS AN ELEMENT OF THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF A MACHINE-BUILDING ENTERPRISE
CORPORATE CULTURE AS AN ELEMENT OF THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF A MACHINE-BUILDING ENTERPRISE
The purpose of the article. The article analyzes the corporate culture as one of the tools with which you can effectively manage the personnel of the enterprise. The structure of c...

Back to Top