Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Art, politics and the public sphere

View through CrossRef
Abstract The relationship between contemporary art in the tradition of the avant-garde, politics and the public domain is the subject of this article. By looking at critical social theory, especially the work of Chantal Mouffe, the relationship between politics and the public sphere will be explored. Via the work of Paulo Virno and Niklas Luhmann, I will get more grip on avant-garde art’s functioning in society and its relationship with politics and the public sphere. By discussing the insights of these theorists it will be argued that the contemporary art world – as a sphere of concrete museums, biennials, exhibitions, etc. form a public sphere of many different singularities, artistic styles and sometimes even conflicting paradigms and cultures. Contrary to the classic Habermasian view (1989) this public sphere is seen as an agonistic one in which a multitude of conflicting voices coexist. Contemporary art in the tradition of the avant-garde time and again posits a ‘dismeasure’ within a culture and will therefore take up a minority position within a society. This does however allow this art scene to become a model for a specific interpretation of democracy, especially a minority democracy, in which collective support for emerging singular voices has to be gained time and again. The argumentation needed to grow from the singular base to a somewhat or very much larger collective base is the core of a minority democracy within an agonistic public sphere. This view is at odds with the concept of public sphere mostly held nowadays according to the rules of the dominant liberal representative democracy, which, after all, found its legitimacy on anonymous numbers (the majority of votes) and the third way of compromise. But also hegemonic political regimes of today, such as neo-liberalism and the upcoming neo-nationalism, are concerned about agonistic spheres, because from their perspective they are still difficult to control. It is one of the reasons why such ideologies hardly know how to respond to contemporary avant-garde art.
Title: Art, politics and the public sphere
Description:
Abstract The relationship between contemporary art in the tradition of the avant-garde, politics and the public domain is the subject of this article.
By looking at critical social theory, especially the work of Chantal Mouffe, the relationship between politics and the public sphere will be explored.
Via the work of Paulo Virno and Niklas Luhmann, I will get more grip on avant-garde art’s functioning in society and its relationship with politics and the public sphere.
By discussing the insights of these theorists it will be argued that the contemporary art world – as a sphere of concrete museums, biennials, exhibitions, etc.
form a public sphere of many different singularities, artistic styles and sometimes even conflicting paradigms and cultures.
Contrary to the classic Habermasian view (1989) this public sphere is seen as an agonistic one in which a multitude of conflicting voices coexist.
Contemporary art in the tradition of the avant-garde time and again posits a ‘dismeasure’ within a culture and will therefore take up a minority position within a society.
This does however allow this art scene to become a model for a specific interpretation of democracy, especially a minority democracy, in which collective support for emerging singular voices has to be gained time and again.
The argumentation needed to grow from the singular base to a somewhat or very much larger collective base is the core of a minority democracy within an agonistic public sphere.
This view is at odds with the concept of public sphere mostly held nowadays according to the rules of the dominant liberal representative democracy, which, after all, found its legitimacy on anonymous numbers (the majority of votes) and the third way of compromise.
But also hegemonic political regimes of today, such as neo-liberalism and the upcoming neo-nationalism, are concerned about agonistic spheres, because from their perspective they are still difficult to control.
It is one of the reasons why such ideologies hardly know how to respond to contemporary avant-garde art.

Related Results

Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
“Lavender Haze” in the Airways
“Lavender Haze” in the Airways
Introduction Taylor Swift has dominated global press in recent years through the success of her Eras Tour, her use of authenticity in branding (Khanal 234), and her choreographed e...
Public Sphere
Public Sphere
The “public sphere” is generally conceived as the social space in which different opinions are expressed, problems of general concern are discussed, and collective solutions are de...
Art and the Public Sphere: From controversy to opinion formation in the making of contemporary art
Art and the Public Sphere: From controversy to opinion formation in the making of contemporary art
Abstract W. J. T. Mitchell first coupled the terms ‘Art’ and the ‘Public Sphere’ in 1992 in the title of his edited book Art and the Public Sphere (1992). The volume...
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF SPORTS AND HEALTH SPHERE OF THE REGION
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF SPORTS AND HEALTH SPHERE OF THE REGION
Purpose. The aim of the article is scientific substantiation of the new concept of development of the sports and health sphere of the region, which is based on the observance of th...
Société de travailleurs et dérive du politique vers le totalitarisme chez Simone Weil et Hannah Arendt
Société de travailleurs et dérive du politique vers le totalitarisme chez Simone Weil et Hannah Arendt
Does the emergence of economic activity in the public sphere mean that it is possible to make a distinction between the private sphere and the public sphere ? For Hannah Arendt, th...
Political topics (Fiction)
Political topics (Fiction)
The variable examines which political topics are prevalent in fictional entertainment. Studies differentiate either between the two categories political and sociopolitical issues (...
Public Art and Religion in America
Public Art and Religion in America
Public art in the United States has a long and complicated history through which nationalism and public monuments have often been intertwined. The most prominent public art forms h...

Back to Top