Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effects of Water and Gas Injection Rates in WAG Flooding for a Heterogeneous Oil Reservoir: A Simulation Study

View through CrossRef
Abstract A simulation study to find the effect of water and gas injection rates to the oil recovery factor from WAG flooding was undertook. The technique was applied as a secondary recovery process and a heterogeneous reservoir model was used. The aim of the study is to determine the optimum injection rate of water and CO2 as well as the trend of oil recovery with varying injection rates. The dimension of the model is 5000 ft x 5000 ft x 120 ft which was divided into 20 x 20 x 7 grid blocks. The STOOIP is 68 MMSTB. Primary recovery from the reservoir was 15% of STOOIP. 5 spot injection pattern was used for this study. Water flooding when used as the secondary recovery technique produced 38% of the STOOIP. WAG flooding using WAG ratio of 1:1, 2:3 and 3:2 each produced 41.5%, 44% and 39.5% of STOOIP respectively. WAG proved to be the better secondary recovery technique with WAG ratio of 2:3 being the optimum WAG ratio. Oil recovery factor increases with the injection rate of gas and water until the optimum injection rate and then the recovery starts to decline. The optimum injection rate for water is in the range of 2000 to 2500 STB/D while for CO2 is about 2500 to 3000 MSCF/D. The effect of heterogeneity was felt during this simulation as oil in the low permeability layers could not be produced easily. The results of this study are good indication of the future of WAG as a secondary recovery technique. Technical viability and economic feasibility of WAG should be studied intensively while other WAG parameters should be optimized. This study strongly suggests the use of WAG as the secondary recovery technique whenever the situation permits.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Effects of Water and Gas Injection Rates in WAG Flooding for a Heterogeneous Oil Reservoir: A Simulation Study
Description:
Abstract A simulation study to find the effect of water and gas injection rates to the oil recovery factor from WAG flooding was undertook.
The technique was applied as a secondary recovery process and a heterogeneous reservoir model was used.
The aim of the study is to determine the optimum injection rate of water and CO2 as well as the trend of oil recovery with varying injection rates.
The dimension of the model is 5000 ft x 5000 ft x 120 ft which was divided into 20 x 20 x 7 grid blocks.
The STOOIP is 68 MMSTB.
Primary recovery from the reservoir was 15% of STOOIP.
5 spot injection pattern was used for this study.
Water flooding when used as the secondary recovery technique produced 38% of the STOOIP.
WAG flooding using WAG ratio of 1:1, 2:3 and 3:2 each produced 41.
5%, 44% and 39.
5% of STOOIP respectively.
WAG proved to be the better secondary recovery technique with WAG ratio of 2:3 being the optimum WAG ratio.
Oil recovery factor increases with the injection rate of gas and water until the optimum injection rate and then the recovery starts to decline.
The optimum injection rate for water is in the range of 2000 to 2500 STB/D while for CO2 is about 2500 to 3000 MSCF/D.
The effect of heterogeneity was felt during this simulation as oil in the low permeability layers could not be produced easily.
The results of this study are good indication of the future of WAG as a secondary recovery technique.
Technical viability and economic feasibility of WAG should be studied intensively while other WAG parameters should be optimized.
This study strongly suggests the use of WAG as the secondary recovery technique whenever the situation permits.

Related Results

Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Abstract Separated layer water injection is the important technology to realize the oilfield long-term high and stable yield. Through continuous researches and te...
Studies On Foam Flooding EOR Technique For Daqing Reservoirs After Polymer Flooding
Studies On Foam Flooding EOR Technique For Daqing Reservoirs After Polymer Flooding
Abstract Most of the high permeability reservoirs in Daqing oil field have been conducted by water flooding and polymer flooding. The average oil reco...
Mechanism Study on Foam Flooding for Daqing Reservoirs After Polymer Flooding
Mechanism Study on Foam Flooding for Daqing Reservoirs After Polymer Flooding
Abstract Polymer flooding has been carried out widely in Daqing oilfield. The average oil recovery was 53% and the water cut was more than 90% after polymer flooding...
First Successful Execution of Miscible Gas Injection EOR Pilot in Kuwait: Challenges & Opportunities
First Successful Execution of Miscible Gas Injection EOR Pilot in Kuwait: Challenges & Opportunities
Abstract A hydrocarbon gas injection pilot was successfully conducted in a heterogeneous multilayered Oolitic carbonate reservoir in Kuwait. The pilot strived toward...
CO2 Flooding WAG Safety Control Technology
CO2 Flooding WAG Safety Control Technology
Abstract Under the conditions of injecting pure CO2, the corrosion rate of strings in CO2 injection wells is very low, while in WAG process, because CO2 is mixed wit...
Monitoring Water Alternate Gas (WAG) Process Using Streaming Potential Measurement
Monitoring Water Alternate Gas (WAG) Process Using Streaming Potential Measurement
Abstract Spontaneous potential (SP) is commonly measured during reservoir characterization. SP signals are also generated during hydrocarbon production due to the st...
The Methods Taken in SZ36-1 Oilfield in the Early Stage of Production
The Methods Taken in SZ36-1 Oilfield in the Early Stage of Production
Abstract SZ 36-1 Oil Field is located in Liaodong Bay of Bohai Sea and is an unconsolidated sand and structure-lithology reservoir. The reservoir is distributed i...

Back to Top