Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Economic impact of comorbidities in spine surgery
View through CrossRef
Object
Comorbidities in patients undergoing spine surgery may reasonably be factors that increase health care costs. To verify this hypothesis, the authors conducted the following study.
Methods
Major comorbidities and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were retrospectively analyzed for 816 patients who underwent spine surgery at the authors' institutions between 2005 and 2008, and treatment costs (hospital charges) were assessed with the help of statistical software. The sample was collected by a nonmedical staff (hired at the beginning of 2006). Patients underwent one of the three most common types of spine surgery: lumbar microdiscectomy (20.5%), anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF; 60.3%), or lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF; 19.2%). Patients were nearly equally divided by sex (53% were female and 47% male), and 78% were Caucasian versus 21% who were African American; the rest were of mixed or unidentified race. The average age was 54 years, with an SD of ± 14 years.
Results
There were significant differences in the prevalence of major comorbidities between male and female and between severely obese and nonseverely obese patients. The impact of comorbidities on the cost of spine surgery was more prominent in older patients, and an additive effect from some comorbidities was recorded in various types of spine surgery. For instance, in the ACDF group, female patients with both severe obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) had significantly higher hospital charges than those with only one or neither of these conditions ($34,943 for both severe obesity and DM vs $25,633 for severe obesity only; $25,826 for DM only; and $25,153 for those with neither condition [p < 0.05]). In the LDF group, female patients with both DM and a history of depression had significantly higher hospital charges than those with only one or neither of these conditions ($65,782 for both DM and depression vs $53,504 for DM only; $55,990 for depression only; and $52,249 for those with neither condition [p < 0.05]). A significant difference was also found in hospital cost ($16,472 [p < 0.01]; 32% increase over baseline) in the LDF group between patients with the lowest and highest scores on the Charlson Index.
Conclusions
Comorbidities additively increase hospital costs for patients who undergo spine surgery, and should be considered in payment arrangements.
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Title: Economic impact of comorbidities in spine surgery
Description:
Object
Comorbidities in patients undergoing spine surgery may reasonably be factors that increase health care costs.
To verify this hypothesis, the authors conducted the following study.
Methods
Major comorbidities and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were retrospectively analyzed for 816 patients who underwent spine surgery at the authors' institutions between 2005 and 2008, and treatment costs (hospital charges) were assessed with the help of statistical software.
The sample was collected by a nonmedical staff (hired at the beginning of 2006).
Patients underwent one of the three most common types of spine surgery: lumbar microdiscectomy (20.
5%), anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF; 60.
3%), or lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF; 19.
2%).
Patients were nearly equally divided by sex (53% were female and 47% male), and 78% were Caucasian versus 21% who were African American; the rest were of mixed or unidentified race.
The average age was 54 years, with an SD of ± 14 years.
Results
There were significant differences in the prevalence of major comorbidities between male and female and between severely obese and nonseverely obese patients.
The impact of comorbidities on the cost of spine surgery was more prominent in older patients, and an additive effect from some comorbidities was recorded in various types of spine surgery.
For instance, in the ACDF group, female patients with both severe obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) had significantly higher hospital charges than those with only one or neither of these conditions ($34,943 for both severe obesity and DM vs $25,633 for severe obesity only; $25,826 for DM only; and $25,153 for those with neither condition [p < 0.
05]).
In the LDF group, female patients with both DM and a history of depression had significantly higher hospital charges than those with only one or neither of these conditions ($65,782 for both DM and depression vs $53,504 for DM only; $55,990 for depression only; and $52,249 for those with neither condition [p < 0.
05]).
A significant difference was also found in hospital cost ($16,472 [p < 0.
01]; 32% increase over baseline) in the LDF group between patients with the lowest and highest scores on the Charlson Index.
Conclusions
Comorbidities additively increase hospital costs for patients who undergo spine surgery, and should be considered in payment arrangements.
Related Results
Comparison between upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique in the treatment of mechanical neck pain
Comparison between upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique in the treatment of mechanical neck pain
Upper thoracic spine mobilization and the Ergon technique are used to treat mechanical neck pain in order to speed recovery, promote tissue healing and improve range of motion. The...
Influence of Psychiatric Comorbidities on Clinical Outcome Before and after Elective Spine Surgery. A Prospective Observational Study
Influence of Psychiatric Comorbidities on Clinical Outcome Before and after Elective Spine Surgery. A Prospective Observational Study
Introduction
It is widely accepted that psychiatric comorbidities have a negative influence on health-related quality of life and long-term outcomes following s...
Formation, stability, and competition in dendritic proto-spines
Formation, stability, and competition in dendritic proto-spines
Over 80 % of excitatory synapses in the mammalian brain terminate on dendritic spines, which support key functions of memory storage and computation. Despite the neurodevelopmental...
Day Care Spine Surgery Versus Conventional Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis
Day Care Spine Surgery Versus Conventional Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and patient benefits of daycare spine surgery as compared to traditional spine surgery.
Materials & Methods: This ...
Spinal cord injury as a component of polytrauma in road accident victims
Spinal cord injury as a component of polytrauma in road accident victims
Background. Road traffic injury remains one of the most serious and complex types of human injury both in Ukraine and around the world. The purpose of the research: to determine th...
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease: potential role of KL-6 and systemic inflammation
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease: potential role of KL-6 and systemic inflammation
Abstract
Background
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, and fatal disease of the lungs. It is characterized by pulmona...
Prevalence and correlation of symptoms and comorbidities in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Prevalence and correlation of symptoms and comorbidities in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 affected millions of people, and the patients present a constellation of symptoms and comorbid...
Maximal Benefit Zone of Endoscopic Spine Surgery in the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: Rationale of Endoscopic Spine Surgery in the Cervical-thoracic Region
Maximal Benefit Zone of Endoscopic Spine Surgery in the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: Rationale of Endoscopic Spine Surgery in the Cervical-thoracic Region
Complex anatomy, difficult access, and low tolerance of cord manipulation in the cervical and thoracic spine are some of the most challenging aspects of spine surgery. Open cervica...

