Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Emergency department patient preferences for waiting for a bed

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjective:  Many EDs have difficulty transferring admitted patients to inpatient beds in a timely manner because of access block. We assessed ED patient preferences for waiting location.Method:  Admitted ED patients at Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia were surveyed over a 4 week period. Patients were questioned about their preferences for waiting location (ED cubicle, ED corridor, ward corridor, no preference). Patients were also asked what they felt was the maximum acceptable time for waiting for a ward bed. We also assessed if patient expectations were met with regards to their waiting times.Results:  A total of 400 patients were surveyed. Of all, 121 patients (30.2%) had no preference for waiting location and 215 patients (53.8%) preferred ED cubicles. If the waiting location option was between EDs and ward corridors, 185 patients (46.2%) had no preference. Of the 215 patients who had a preference, 72.1% preferred to wait in a ward corridor (95% CI 65.5–77.8%) and 27.9% preferred the ED corridor (95% CI 22.1–34.5%). Fifty‐seven per cent of patients expected to get to their ward bed within 6 h. Seventy‐two point one per cent (95% CI 66.3%–77.2%) of patients did not have their expectations met for bed waiting times.Conclusions:  Patients would prefer to wait in ward corridors for their ward bed if there was no ED cubicle available. Waiting in the ED corridor is their least preferred option. Patients usually expect to get to their ward bed within 3 h. However, with high levels of access block, patient expectations for waiting times for a bed are usually not met. These findings could be used to drive system changes that are more patient‐focussed.
Title: Emergency department patient preferences for waiting for a bed
Description:
AbstractObjective:  Many EDs have difficulty transferring admitted patients to inpatient beds in a timely manner because of access block.
We assessed ED patient preferences for waiting location.
Method:  Admitted ED patients at Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia were surveyed over a 4 week period.
Patients were questioned about their preferences for waiting location (ED cubicle, ED corridor, ward corridor, no preference).
Patients were also asked what they felt was the maximum acceptable time for waiting for a ward bed.
We also assessed if patient expectations were met with regards to their waiting times.
Results:  A total of 400 patients were surveyed.
Of all, 121 patients (30.
2%) had no preference for waiting location and 215 patients (53.
8%) preferred ED cubicles.
If the waiting location option was between EDs and ward corridors, 185 patients (46.
2%) had no preference.
Of the 215 patients who had a preference, 72.
1% preferred to wait in a ward corridor (95% CI 65.
5–77.
8%) and 27.
9% preferred the ED corridor (95% CI 22.
1–34.
5%).
Fifty‐seven per cent of patients expected to get to their ward bed within 6 h.
Seventy‐two point one per cent (95% CI 66.
3%–77.
2%) of patients did not have their expectations met for bed waiting times.
Conclusions:  Patients would prefer to wait in ward corridors for their ward bed if there was no ED cubicle available.
Waiting in the ED corridor is their least preferred option.
Patients usually expect to get to their ward bed within 3 h.
However, with high levels of access block, patient expectations for waiting times for a bed are usually not met.
These findings could be used to drive system changes that are more patient‐focussed.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Waiting with Hope: How Waiting Time Shapes Patient Experience
Waiting with Hope: How Waiting Time Shapes Patient Experience
Waiting time for services is a crucial factor influencing patient satisfaction, especially in primary healthcare facilities such as community health centers. Patients who experienc...
How does bed load transport influence the longitudinal profile of reservoir sedimentation?
How does bed load transport influence the longitudinal profile of reservoir sedimentation?
The construction of the reservoir has destroyed the equilibrium of the natural river and promoted the siltation of a large amount of sediment in the reservoir. The longitudinal pro...
Economic Evaluation of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Soil Nutrient Availability and BenefitCost Ratio under the Malwa Region
Economic Evaluation of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Soil Nutrient Availability and BenefitCost Ratio under the Malwa Region
The present investigation titled “Economic Evaluation of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Soil Nutrient Availability and Benefit–Cost Ratio under the Malwa Region”. The present...
STRATEGI PEMASARAN DALAM PERSEKTIF MARKETING SYARIAH PADA UKM SALMA BED ALKES
STRATEGI PEMASARAN DALAM PERSEKTIF MARKETING SYARIAH PADA UKM SALMA BED ALKES
Abstrak Peningkatan persaingan dan perubahan dinamika pasar menuntut UKM untuk mengembangkan strategi pemasaran yang efisien dan efektif. Dengan persaingan yang ketat menjadi satu...
CFD-Based Modeling of Kraft Char Beds • Part 1: Char Bed Burning Model
CFD-Based Modeling of Kraft Char Beds • Part 1: Char Bed Burning Model
Understanding the physical and chemical phenomena governing char bed burning is important for stable and efficient operation of the recovery boiler. Stand-alone char bed models hav...

Back to Top