Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ASSESSMENT OF PATTERN OF CAESAREAN SECTION USING ROBSON'S TEN GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

View through CrossRef
Background: Robson's Classification System is instrumental in benchmarking and improving maternal care. By categorizing patients based on their specific clinical circumstances, the system allows for a nuanced analysis of C-section rates and their underlying causes. Present study was aimed to assess pattern of caesarean section using Robson's ten group classification system in tertiary care hospital. Material And Methods: Present study was cross-sectional study, conducted in women who delivered via C-Section at our hospital during the study period, were then classified according to Robinson's 10 groups. Results: In our hospital, during the course of the study, out of 1000 deliveries, 391 (39.1%) were LSCS deliveries and 609 (60.9%) were vaginal deliveries. As per ROBSON ten group classification system among various groups, maximum proportion of LSCS (LSCS rate) (100%) was observed in group 9 (women with abnormal lie), followed by 75.5% in group 5 (women with previous LSCS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) and 42.5% in nulliparous patients with single cephalic, >37 weeks in group 1 (spontaneous labour).Lowest LSCS rate was observed in group 8 (women with multiple pregnancies). Maximum number of patients of LSCS were from Category 5 (women with previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) (191, 48.8%) and from Category 2 (Nulliparous women, single cephalic, >37 weeks, induced or CS before labor) (117, 29.9%). Minimum patients were in Category 9 (women abnormal lies) (2, 0.5%) and Category 8 (women with multiple pregnancies) (5, 1.3%). Conclusion: The application of ROBSON'S criteria to assess the pattern of caesarean sections in the study has provided valuable insights into the distribution and trends of caesarean deliveries within the sample size. The study revealed that majority of caesarean sections were concentrated within ROBSON'S group 5 – 48.8% (All multi-parous women, at least one previous uterine scar, single, cephalic,>37 weeks gestation).
Title: ASSESSMENT OF PATTERN OF CAESAREAN SECTION USING ROBSON'S TEN GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Description:
Background: Robson's Classification System is instrumental in benchmarking and improving maternal care.
By categorizing patients based on their specific clinical circumstances, the system allows for a nuanced analysis of C-section rates and their underlying causes.
Present study was aimed to assess pattern of caesarean section using Robson's ten group classification system in tertiary care hospital.
Material And Methods: Present study was cross-sectional study, conducted in women who delivered via C-Section at our hospital during the study period, were then classified according to Robinson's 10 groups.
Results: In our hospital, during the course of the study, out of 1000 deliveries, 391 (39.
1%) were LSCS deliveries and 609 (60.
9%) were vaginal deliveries.
As per ROBSON ten group classification system among various groups, maximum proportion of LSCS (LSCS rate) (100%) was observed in group 9 (women with abnormal lie), followed by 75.
5% in group 5 (women with previous LSCS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) and 42.
5% in nulliparous patients with single cephalic, >37 weeks in group 1 (spontaneous labour).
Lowest LSCS rate was observed in group 8 (women with multiple pregnancies).
Maximum number of patients of LSCS were from Category 5 (women with previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) (191, 48.
8%) and from Category 2 (Nulliparous women, single cephalic, >37 weeks, induced or CS before labor) (117, 29.
9%).
Minimum patients were in Category 9 (women abnormal lies) (2, 0.
5%) and Category 8 (women with multiple pregnancies) (5, 1.
3%).
Conclusion: The application of ROBSON'S criteria to assess the pattern of caesarean sections in the study has provided valuable insights into the distribution and trends of caesarean deliveries within the sample size.
The study revealed that majority of caesarean sections were concentrated within ROBSON'S group 5 – 48.
8% (All multi-parous women, at least one previous uterine scar, single, cephalic,>37 weeks gestation).

Related Results

A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common obstetric procedures worldwide and an increased rate of caesarean section has been observed in recent studies. Maternal...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Trends in caesarean section in Esut teaching hospital, Esuth, Parklane, Enugu, Nigeria: A five-year review
Trends in caesarean section in Esut teaching hospital, Esuth, Parklane, Enugu, Nigeria: A five-year review
Background: Caesarean section, also known as caesarean delivery, is the surgical procedure, by which one or more babies are delivered through an incision in the mother’s abdomen. C...
Post-operative Experience following Caesarean Section in a Nigerian Obstetric Population
Post-operative Experience following Caesarean Section in a Nigerian Obstetric Population
Background: Caesarean section is the most significant obstetrics operative intervention globally. Good postoperative experience after caesarean section is important because there i...
Determinants of Caesarean Deliveries in Bangladesh: A Multilevel Analysis of a Nationwide Population-Based Survey
Determinants of Caesarean Deliveries in Bangladesh: A Multilevel Analysis of a Nationwide Population-Based Survey
Caesarean section, a frequently conducted surgical procedure in obstetrics, is instrumental in safeguarding the well-being of both mothers and infants by addressing complications r...

Back to Top