Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 343: Cardiovascular Device Recalls in 2012
View through CrossRef
Background:
For the fiscal year 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified 1,190 medical device recalls. Of these, 132 (11%) were for cardiovascular (CV) devices. Class I recalls, representing the greatest health risk, result from finding a reasonable probability that device use will cause serious adverse health consequences or death. FDA approves or clears devices for the US market through either the Pre-Market Approval (PMA) pathway or, more commonly, through a substantial equivalence determination known as 510(k) clearance.
Methods:
Recalled devices were categorized into nine broad CV device groups. Recall data was included on class, marketing path, and the number of distributed devices.
Results:
PMA devices represented 14% of the CV device recalls and 510(k) devices represented 82%. There were four Class I recalls -- two PMA and two 510(k). Circulatory support and surgical (CS) was the device group with highest number of recalls (43, 33%). Physiologic monitors (PM) had the second highest (28, 21%) and Vascular catheters (VC) the third highest (17, 13%). The remaining recalls (44, 33%) were included in these device groups: Implanted pacemakers, defibrillators and leads (ID), Non-implantable EP devices (EP), External defibrillators (ED), Vascular access (VA), Stents/grafts/valves (SG), and Others (OT).
Over 16 million distributed devices were recalled in the year, with the highest average number per recall seen in the CS group and the lowest in the EP group. Class I recalls varied based both on market pathway and the number of distributed devices.
Thoratec’s Heartmate II - PMA - 3,852
St Jude Medical’s Riata - PMA -128,000
Draeger’s Infinity System - 510(k) -1
Cardiac Science Powerheart - 510(k) -12,782
Conclusion:
Most of the CV recalls in 2012 were 510(k) devices that were in the CS, PM, or VC device group. Failures in medical devices pose risk to the public and FDA strives to mitigate risk to the public health through the promotion of safe and effective devices, and the removal from the US market of those determined to be unsafe or ineffective.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 343: Cardiovascular Device Recalls in 2012
Description:
Background:
For the fiscal year 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified 1,190 medical device recalls.
Of these, 132 (11%) were for cardiovascular (CV) devices.
Class I recalls, representing the greatest health risk, result from finding a reasonable probability that device use will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.
FDA approves or clears devices for the US market through either the Pre-Market Approval (PMA) pathway or, more commonly, through a substantial equivalence determination known as 510(k) clearance.
Methods:
Recalled devices were categorized into nine broad CV device groups.
Recall data was included on class, marketing path, and the number of distributed devices.
Results:
PMA devices represented 14% of the CV device recalls and 510(k) devices represented 82%.
There were four Class I recalls -- two PMA and two 510(k).
Circulatory support and surgical (CS) was the device group with highest number of recalls (43, 33%).
Physiologic monitors (PM) had the second highest (28, 21%) and Vascular catheters (VC) the third highest (17, 13%).
The remaining recalls (44, 33%) were included in these device groups: Implanted pacemakers, defibrillators and leads (ID), Non-implantable EP devices (EP), External defibrillators (ED), Vascular access (VA), Stents/grafts/valves (SG), and Others (OT).
Over 16 million distributed devices were recalled in the year, with the highest average number per recall seen in the CS group and the lowest in the EP group.
Class I recalls varied based both on market pathway and the number of distributed devices.
Thoratec’s Heartmate II - PMA - 3,852
St Jude Medical’s Riata - PMA -128,000
Draeger’s Infinity System - 510(k) -1
Cardiac Science Powerheart - 510(k) -12,782
Conclusion:
Most of the CV recalls in 2012 were 510(k) devices that were in the CS, PM, or VC device group.
Failures in medical devices pose risk to the public and FDA strives to mitigate risk to the public health through the promotion of safe and effective devices, and the removal from the US market of those determined to be unsafe or ineffective.
Related Results
Analysis Of Medical Device Product Recalls: Insights From The MAUDE Database
Analysis Of Medical Device Product Recalls: Insights From The MAUDE Database
Background: Medical device recalls are crucial for patient safety, and analysing patterns and causes is key to improving device safety and regulations. The MAUDE database, maintain...
Content analysis of drug recall announcements in Saudi Arabia: Between 2016 and 2022
Content analysis of drug recall announcements in Saudi Arabia: Between 2016 and 2022
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to analyze drug recall reports issued by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) in Saudi Arabia over seven years and describe the practi...
Characterisation of the treatment provided for children with unilateral hearing loss
Characterisation of the treatment provided for children with unilateral hearing loss
BackgroundChildren with permanent unilateral hearing loss (UHL) are an understudied population, with limited data to inform the guidelines on clinical management. There is a fundin...
Association between dog and cat ownership with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Association between dog and cat ownership with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Numerous studies have described the correlation of pet ownership with cardiovascular diseases, with dog and cat ownership emerging as the predominant forms of pet compa...
Medical Device Recalls by USFDA: An Evaluation of Regulatory Framework and Industry Practices
Medical Device Recalls by USFDA: An Evaluation of Regulatory Framework and Industry Practices
Medical device recalls pose significant risks to patient safety and public health, underscoring the critical role of regulatory frameworks and industry practices in mitigating thes...
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Background
Medication harm can lead to hospital admission, prolonged hospital stay and poor patient outcomes. Reducing medication harm is a priority for healthc...
A four-year assessment of the characteristics of Rwandan FDA drug recalls
A four-year assessment of the characteristics of Rwandan FDA drug recalls
Abstract
Background
A drug recall is an act of removing products from the market and/or returning them to the manufacturer for disposal or correction when they violated sa...
Contrast-enhanced mammography for surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer
Contrast-enhanced mammography for surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose
Women with a personal history of breast cancer have an increased risk of subsequent breast malignancy and may benefit from more sen...

