Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Evolution, and Insurance

View through CrossRef
AI-driven platforms have the potential to inflict traditional injuries in new ways. Proprietary algorithms trained on large volumes of personal data can cause mental, emotional, and sometimes physical injuries via conversational exchanges, harmful content recommendations, and the promotion of extremist content. This "algorithmic liability" fundamentally challenges existing legal doctrines and statutory protections, thereby exposing deficiencies in current insurance coverage frameworks.&nbsp; <br><br>Historically, courts dismissed algorithmic liability claims early in litigation, invoking Section 230 immunity and First Amendment protections, and resisted classifying algorithmic tools as "products" for the purposes of products liability law. Recent jurisprudence, however, signals a critical turning point. On various grounds, courts are beginning to permit these algorithmic injury cases to proceed past the early procedural challenge phase of litigation.&nbsp;<br><br>This judicial evolution introduces considerable uncertainty for any business that operates on the internet and utilizes potentially harmful algorithms. This Article analyzes emerging forms of liability and argues that they are likely to generate insurance demand in industries that are highly visible but exhibit largely overlooked coverage needs. Litigation exposure heightens the urgent need for affirmative insurance solutions. Traditional insurance policies, including commercial general liability, businessowners', errors and omissions, and cyber, present insurance gaps because they do not typically provide coverage for mental and emotional harm, narrowly define what constitutes a triggering "occurrence," exclude intentional and sexual misconduct, and cover damages unlikely to arise with algorithmic injury claims.&nbsp;<br><br>This Article contributes to the scholarly discourse by advocating for the development of specialized algorithmic injury liability insurance to fill existing insurance gaps and protect a broad range of internet businesses increasingly&nbsp;vulnerable to algorithmic liability claims. This Article argues that tort liability and insurance maintain a largely underappreciated, interdependent relationship—one now reemerging in the context of algorithmic liability—and that the accelerating AI litigation landscape renders inevitable the demand for insurance products responsive to this evolving exposure, even if their precise contours, scope, and pricing remain uncertain.
Elsevier BV
Title: Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Evolution, and Insurance
Description:
AI-driven platforms have the potential to inflict traditional injuries in new ways.
Proprietary algorithms trained on large volumes of personal data can cause mental, emotional, and sometimes physical injuries via conversational exchanges, harmful content recommendations, and the promotion of extremist content.
This "algorithmic liability" fundamentally challenges existing legal doctrines and statutory protections, thereby exposing deficiencies in current insurance coverage frameworks.
&nbsp; <br><br>Historically, courts dismissed algorithmic liability claims early in litigation, invoking Section 230 immunity and First Amendment protections, and resisted classifying algorithmic tools as "products" for the purposes of products liability law.
Recent jurisprudence, however, signals a critical turning point.
On various grounds, courts are beginning to permit these algorithmic injury cases to proceed past the early procedural challenge phase of litigation.
&nbsp;<br><br>This judicial evolution introduces considerable uncertainty for any business that operates on the internet and utilizes potentially harmful algorithms.
This Article analyzes emerging forms of liability and argues that they are likely to generate insurance demand in industries that are highly visible but exhibit largely overlooked coverage needs.
Litigation exposure heightens the urgent need for affirmative insurance solutions.
Traditional insurance policies, including commercial general liability, businessowners', errors and omissions, and cyber, present insurance gaps because they do not typically provide coverage for mental and emotional harm, narrowly define what constitutes a triggering "occurrence," exclude intentional and sexual misconduct, and cover damages unlikely to arise with algorithmic injury claims.
&nbsp;<br><br>This Article contributes to the scholarly discourse by advocating for the development of specialized algorithmic injury liability insurance to fill existing insurance gaps and protect a broad range of internet businesses increasingly&nbsp;vulnerable to algorithmic liability claims.
This Article argues that tort liability and insurance maintain a largely underappreciated, interdependent relationship—one now reemerging in the context of algorithmic liability—and that the accelerating AI litigation landscape renders inevitable the demand for insurance products responsive to this evolving exposure, even if their precise contours, scope, and pricing remain uncertain.

Related Results

The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Commercial Agents and Insurance Agents under the Korean Commercial Act
Commercial Agents and Insurance Agents under the Korean Commercial Act
This article considers the legal concepts, powers and duties of agents under the Commercial Act (Part 2) and insurance agents under the Commercial Act (Part 4), and considers to wh...
Functional roles of the insurance broker in the agricultural insurance market
Functional roles of the insurance broker in the agricultural insurance market
In modern conditions, the agricultural sector is one of the most risky branches of economy. Every year, farmers face significant losses due to various natural disasters, diseases a...
Insurance Products in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing Banking
Insurance Products in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing Banking
Purpose: This paper aims to explain new insurance products and policies in Rastin Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS) Banking. Rastin Banking is a full Islamic Banking System with all ne...
Risk management in crop farming
Risk management in crop farming
The agricultural sector is heavily exposed to the impact of climate change and the more common extreme weather events. This exposure can have significant impacts on agricultural pr...
Insurance as an Alternative for Sustainable Economic Recovery after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review
Insurance as an Alternative for Sustainable Economic Recovery after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review
The risk of natural disasters has increased over the last few decades, leading to significant economic losses across the globe. In response, research related to the risk of economi...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...

Back to Top