Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ilizarov Treatment Protocols in the Management of Infected Nonunion of the Tibia

View through CrossRef
Objectives: We present a treatment algorithm comprising 4 Ilizarov methods in managing infected tibial nonunion, using nonunion mobility and segmental defect size to govern treatment choice. Design: Decision protocol analysis study. Setting: A university-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients/Participants: Seventy-nine patients were treated with 1 of 4 Ilizarov protocols. All patients had undergone at least one previous operation, 38 had associated limb deformity, and 49 had nonviable nonunions. Twenty-six had a new muscle flap at the time of Ilizarov surgery, and 25 had preexisting flaps reused. Intervention: Twenty-six cases were treated with monofocal distraction, 19 with monofocal compression, 16 with bifocal compression/distraction, and 18 with bone transport. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the absence of recurrent infection. Secondary outcomes included bone union, complications, the Association for the Advancement of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) bone and functional classification scores, and any need for further unplanned surgery. Results: Infection was eradicated in 76 cases (96.2%) with a mean follow-up duration of 40.8 months (range 6–131). All 3 infection recurrences occurred in the monofocal compression group. Following the initial Ilizarov method alone, union was achieved in 68 cases (86.1%) and was highest among the monofocal distraction (96.2%) and bifocal compression/distraction groups (93.8%). Monofocal compression achieved the lowest union rate (73.7%), significantly lower ASAMI scores, and a refracture rate of 31.6%. Bone transport secured union in 77.8% with a 44.4% unplanned reoperation rate. However, infection-free union was 100% after further treatment. Conclusions: Monofocal compression is not recommended for treating infected, mobile nonunions. Distraction (monofocal or bifocal) was effective and achieved higher rates of union and infection clearance. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Title: Ilizarov Treatment Protocols in the Management of Infected Nonunion of the Tibia
Description:
Objectives: We present a treatment algorithm comprising 4 Ilizarov methods in managing infected tibial nonunion, using nonunion mobility and segmental defect size to govern treatment choice.
Design: Decision protocol analysis study.
Setting: A university-affiliated teaching hospital.
Patients/Participants: Seventy-nine patients were treated with 1 of 4 Ilizarov protocols.
All patients had undergone at least one previous operation, 38 had associated limb deformity, and 49 had nonviable nonunions.
Twenty-six had a new muscle flap at the time of Ilizarov surgery, and 25 had preexisting flaps reused.
Intervention: Twenty-six cases were treated with monofocal distraction, 19 with monofocal compression, 16 with bifocal compression/distraction, and 18 with bone transport.
Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the absence of recurrent infection.
Secondary outcomes included bone union, complications, the Association for the Advancement of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) bone and functional classification scores, and any need for further unplanned surgery.
Results: Infection was eradicated in 76 cases (96.
2%) with a mean follow-up duration of 40.
8 months (range 6–131).
All 3 infection recurrences occurred in the monofocal compression group.
Following the initial Ilizarov method alone, union was achieved in 68 cases (86.
1%) and was highest among the monofocal distraction (96.
2%) and bifocal compression/distraction groups (93.
8%).
Monofocal compression achieved the lowest union rate (73.
7%), significantly lower ASAMI scores, and a refracture rate of 31.
6%.
Bone transport secured union in 77.
8% with a 44.
4% unplanned reoperation rate.
However, infection-free union was 100% after further treatment.
Conclusions: Monofocal compression is not recommended for treating infected, mobile nonunions.
Distraction (monofocal or bifocal) was effective and achieved higher rates of union and infection clearance.
Level of Evidence: Level III.

Related Results

TIBIAL BONE NONUNION PLASTIC WITH THE USE OF MONOLOCAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS BY RING FIXATORS
TIBIAL BONE NONUNION PLASTIC WITH THE USE OF MONOLOCAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS BY RING FIXATORS
Abstract. Actuality. Monolocal extrafocal osteosynthesis by ring fixators (RF) of tibial nonunion is not a generally accepted method, there are no systematic guidelines for its imp...
Limb Reconstruction System for Infected Nonunion: A Retrospective Study
Limb Reconstruction System for Infected Nonunion: A Retrospective Study
Introduction: Infected non-union of long bones is a complex orthopedic challenge, leading to prolonged disability and healthcare burden. The limb reconstruction system (LRS) offers...
Assessment of body balance of patients treated with the Ilizarov method for tibial nonunion
Assessment of body balance of patients treated with the Ilizarov method for tibial nonunion
Purpose: The biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system in patients after tibial nonunion treatment using the Ilizarov method have not yet been fully explored. From the orthopaedic...
Prevalence, Patterns and Associated Factors of Acute Tibia Plateau Fractures among Adults with Tibia Fractures in Uganda
Prevalence, Patterns and Associated Factors of Acute Tibia Plateau Fractures among Adults with Tibia Fractures in Uganda
Abstract Background: The Tibia plateau makes up one of the most critical load bearing articular surface in the human body. An injury to this vital anatomic region affects k...
Dynamic Gait Parameters in Patients With Nonunion of the Tibia Following Treatment With the Ilizarov Method
Dynamic Gait Parameters in Patients With Nonunion of the Tibia Following Treatment With the Ilizarov Method
Abstract The purpose of this study was a comprehensive assessment of the dynamic parameters of gait in patients who underwent Ilizarov treatment for nonunion of the ...
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v1
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v1
The goal of this Co-Clinical Imaging Research Program (CIRP) pre-clinical imaging protocol (PIP) is to provide detailed description of key steps used to achieve a stated level of t...
PIP MRI Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v2
PIP MRI Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v2
The goal of this Co-Clinical Imaging Research Program (CIRP) pre-clinical imaging protocol (PIP) is to provide detailed description of key steps used to achieve a stated level of t...
PIP MRI Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v1
PIP MRI Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) Measurement of Myelofibrosis in Mouse Tibia v1
The goal of this Co-Clinical Imaging Research Program (CIRP) pre-clinical imaging protocol (PIP) is to provide detailed description of key steps used to achieve a stated level of t...

Back to Top